Employees’ Individual Needs and their Relationship to Idiosyncratic Deals: A Latent Profile Analysis

Annika Pestotnik; Sarah Altmann

doi:10.16993/sjwop.220

Employees’ Individual Needs and their Relationship to Idiosyncratic Deals: A Latent Profile Analysis

Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Volume 8 (2023): Issue 1

By: Annika Pestotnik and Sarah Altmann

Open Access

|Dec 2023

Abstract

Idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) are personalized arrangements negotiated between individual employees and their employers. Whereas research has shown that i-deals positively relate to a wide array of employee attitudes and behaviors, comparatively little is known about the individual-level antecedents of i-deals. Building on the concept of needs-supplies fit, this study addresses this research gap by investigating the role of individual needs, as conceptualized by McClelland (1987), in the negotiation of i-deals. We adopt a person-centered approach that considers the interplay of the individual needs for achievement, power, affiliation, and autonomy. Using latent profile analysis in a sample of 164 employees (study 1), we explore qualitatively and quantitatively distinct profiles of individual needs. In another sample of 553 employees from various organizations (study 2), we test the replicability of the profiles and analyze differences in successful i-deal negotiation among the profiles. Our results show that four of the profiles from study 1 could be replicated in study 2. While in study 1, one profile is identified that is characterized by an extremely high need for autonomy, study 2 identifies two profiles that are characterized by a high need for autonomy. The results also reveal that employees’ membership in profiles of individual needs predicts the successful negotiation of various types of i-deals. This study provides a nuanced understanding of the relationship between individual needs and i-deals.

References

Anand, S., & Rofcanin, Y. (2022). I-deals and the future of work: A research agenda for the post-pandemic age. In S. Anand & Y. Rofcanin (Eds.), Idiosyncratic deals at work: Exploring individual, organizational, and societal perspectives (pp. 309–333). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88516-8_13
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Andersen, J. A. (2010). Public versus private managers: How public and private managers differ in leadership behavior. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 131–141. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02117.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Andersen, J. A. (2018). Managers’ motivation profiles: Measurement and application. Sage Open, 8(2), 1–9. DOI: 10.1177/2158244018771732
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(3), 329–341. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bakker, A. S., & Ererdi, C. (2022). I-deals and employee well-being: Examining i-deals from JD-R perspective. In S. Anand & Y. Rofcanin (Eds.), Idiosyncratic deals at work: Exploring individual, organizational, and societal perspectives (pp. 237–256). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88516-8_11
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bal, M., & Lub, X. D. (2015). Individualization of work arrangements: A contextualized perspective on the rise and use of i-deals. In M. Bal & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Idiosyncratic deals between employees and organizations: Conceptual issues, applications, and the role of co-workers (pp. 9–23). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315771496-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bal, P. M. (2017). Why do employees negotiate idiosyncratic deals? An exploration of the process of i-deal negotiation. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 42(1), 2–18
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bal, P. M., & Vossaert, L. (2019). Development of an i-deals motivation and management measure. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 18(4), 201–215. DOI: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000236
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 43–51. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.43
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bayazit, E. Z., & Bayazit, M. (2019). How do flexible work arrangements alleviate work-family-conflict? The roles of flexibility i-deals and family-supportive cultures. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(3), 405–435. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1278615
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W Berry. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Sage Publications.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen, Y., Wen, Z., & Ye, M. (2017). Exploring profiles of work regulatory focus: A person-centered approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 16–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.019
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Conway, N., & Coyle-Shapiro, J. (2016). Not so i-deal: A critical review of idiosyncratic deals theory and research. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Current issues in work and organizational psychology (pp. 165–188). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429468339-10
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Denzinger, F., & Brandstätter, V. (2018). Stability of and changes in implicit motives. A narrative review of empirical studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 777. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00777
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Duffy, J. A., & Lilly, J. (2013). Do individual needs moderate the relationships between organizational citizenship behavior, organizational trust and perceived organizational support? Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 14(3), 185–197. DOI: 10.21818/001c.17930
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Duncan, L. E., & Peterson, B. E. (2010). Gender and motivation for achievement, affiliation–intimacy, and power. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 41–62). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. John Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Engeser, S., & Langens, T. (2010). Mapping explicit social motives of achievement, power, and affiliation onto the five-factor model of personality. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(4), 309–318. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00773.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fagenson, E. (1992). Mentoring—Who needs it? A comparison of protégés’ and nonprotégés’ needs for power, achievement, affiliation, and autonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 41(1), 48–60. DOI: 10.1016/0001-8791(92)90038-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ferguson, S. L., G. Moore, E. W., & Hull, D. M. (2020). Finding latent groups in observed data: A primer on latent profile analysis in Mplus for applied researchers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(5), 458–468. DOI: 10.1177/0165025419881721
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Friedman, B. A., & Mandel, R. G. (2011). Motivation predictors of college student academic performance and retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 13(1), 1–15. DOI: 10.2190/CS.13.1.a
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gabriel, A. S., Daniels, M. A., Diefendorff, J. M., & Greguras, G. J. (2015). Emotional labor actors: A latent profile analysis of emotional labor strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 863–879. DOI: 10.1037/a0037408
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guerrero, S., Bentein, K., & Lapalme, M. È. (2014). Idiosyncratic deals and high performers’ organizational commitment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 323–334. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-013-9316-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Balin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Bowler, W. M. (2007). Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The mediating role of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 93–106. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heckert, T. M., Cuneio, G., Hannah, A. P., Adams, P. J., Droste, H. E., Mueller, M. A., Wallis, H. A., Griffin, C. M., & Roberts, L. L. (2000). Creation of a new needs assessment questionnaire. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(1), 121–136. DOI: 10.1037/e413782005-409
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ho, V. T., & Tekleab, A. G. (2016). A model of idiosyncratic deal-making and attitudinal outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(3), 642–656. DOI: 10.1108/JMP-12-2014-0369
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hofmans, J., Wille, B., & Schreurs, B. (2020). Person-centered methods in vocational research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, Article 103398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103398.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., & Glaser, J. (2008). Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 655–664. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.655
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Glaser, J., Angerer, P., & Weigl, M. (2011). Employee-oriented leadership and quality of working life: Mediating roles of idiosyncratic deals. Psychological Reports, 108(1), 59–74. DOI: 10.2466/07.13.14.21.PR0.108.1.59-74
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Weigl, M., Mueller, A., & Glaser, J. (2014). Redesigning work through idiosyncratic deals. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(4), 608–626. DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.740171
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302–317. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnett & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 75–130). Consulting Psychologists Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kanfer, R., Frese, M., & Johnson, R. E. (2017). Motivation related to work: A century of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338–355. DOI: 10.1037/apl0000133
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kehr, H. M. (2004). Integrating implicit motives, explicit motives, and perceived abilities: The compensatory model of work motivation and volition. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 479–499. DOI: 10.2307/20159055
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Klotz, A. C., Bolino, M. C., Song, H., & Stornelli, J. (2018). Examining the nature, causes, and consequences of profiles of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(5), 629–647. DOI: 10.1002/job.2259
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Las Heras, M., Rofcanin, Y., Matthijs Bal, P., & Stollberger, J. (2017). How do flexibility i-deals relate to work performance? Exploring the roles of family performance and organizational context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(8), 1280–1294. DOI: 10.1002/job.2203
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Laulié, L., Tekleab, A. G., & Lee, J. J. (2021). Why grant i-deals? Supervisors’ prior i-deals, exchange ideology, and justice sensitivity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(1), 17–31. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-019-09670-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lawrence, S., & Jordan, P. (2009). Testing an explicit and implicit measure of motivation. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 17(2), 103–120. DOI: 10.1108/19348830910948959
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee, E. K., Hong, W., & Rupp, D. E. (2022). Employee idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) and organizational justice: the role of individual job performance and coworkers’ i-deals. Personnel Review, 52(9), 2322–2341. DOI: 10.1108/PR-05-2021-0335
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee, J. Y., Bachrach, D. G., & Rousseau, D. M. (2015). Internal labor markets, firm-specific human capital, and heterogeneity antecedents of employee idiosyncratic deal requests. Organization Science, 26(3), 794–810. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0955
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liao, C., Wayne, S. J., & Rousseau, D. M. (2016). Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), 9–29. DOI: 10.1002/job.1959
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139878289
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96(4), 690–702. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meyer, J. P., Morin, A. J., Stanley, L. J., & Maltin, E. R. (2019). Teachers’ dual commitment to the organization and occupation: A person-centered investigation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 100–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.009.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moran, C. M., Diefendorff, J. M., Kim, T. Y., & Liu, Z. Q. (2012). A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(3), 354–363. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2012.09.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Morin, A. J., Boudrias, J. S., Marsh, H. W., McInerney, D. M., Dagenais-Desmarais, V., Madore, I., & Litalien, D. (2017). Complementary variable-and person-centered approaches to the dimensionality of psychometric constructs: Application to psychological wellbeing at work. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 395–419. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-016-9448-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 268–277. DOI: 10.1016/0001-8791(87)90043-1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nagin, D. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, London, Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/9780674041318
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2015). Idiosyncratic deals and voice behavior. Journal of Management, 41(3), 893–928. DOI: 10.1177/0149206312457824
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ng, T. W., & Lucianetti, L. (2016). Goal striving, idiosyncratic deals, and job behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), 41–60. DOI: 10.1002/job.2023
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. DOI: 10.1080/10705510701575396
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nylund-Gibson, K., & Choi, A. Y. (2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4(4), 440–461. DOI: 10.1037/tps0000176
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 463–479. DOI: 10.1002/job.678
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rigney, D. (2010). The Matthew effect: How advantage begets further advantage. Columbia University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roczniewska, M., Retowski, S., & Higgins, E. T. (2018). How person-organization fit impacts employees’ perceptions of justice and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2318. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02318
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rofcanin, Y., Berber, A., Koch, S., & Sevinc, L. (2016). Job crafting and i-deals: A study testing the nomological network of proactive behaviors. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(22), 2695–2726. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1091370
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rosen, C. C., Slater, D. J., Chang, C. H., & Johnson, R. E. (2013). Let’s make a deal: Development and validation of the ex post i-deals scale. Journal of Management, 39(3), 709–742. DOI: 10.1177/0149206310394865
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rousseau, D. M. (2005). I-deals: Idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rousseau, D. M., Ho, V. T., & Greenberg, J. (2006). I-deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 977–994. DOI: 10.2307/20159261
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rousseau, D. M., Hornung, S., & Kim, T. G. (2009). Idiosyncratic deals: Testing propositions on timing, content, and the employment relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 338–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.02.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Satow, L. (2012). Skala zur Erfassung von Testverfälschung durch positive Selbstdarstellung und sozial erwünschte Antworttendenzen (SEA). https://www.psycharchives.org/bitstream/20.500.12034/430/1/PT_9006446_SEA_Satow_Beschreibung_und_Fragebogen.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simosi, M., Aldossari, M., Chaudhry, S., & Rousseau, D. M. (2023). Uncovering missing voices: Invisible aspects of idiosyncratic deals (i-deals). Group & Organization Management, 48(1), 3–30. DOI: 10.1177/10596011221120377
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Singh, S., & Vidyarthi, P. R. (2018). Idiosyncratic deals to employee outcomes: Mediating role of social exchange relationships. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(4), 443–455. DOI: 10.1177/1548051818762338
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 862–882. DOI: 10.1037/a0024950
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, Article 103445. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steers, R. M., & Braunstein, D. N. (1976). A behaviorally-based measure of manifest needs in work settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9(2), 251–266. DOI: 10.1016/0001-8791(76)90083-X
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). The future of work motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 379–387. DOI: 10.2307/20159049
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Street, D. L., & Bishop, A. C. (1991). An empirical examination of the need profiles of professional accountants. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 3, 97–116.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tang, Y., & Hornung, S. (2015). Work-family enrichment through i-deals: Evidence from Chinese employees. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(8), 940–954. DOI: 10.1108/JMP-02-2013-0064
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Taormina, R. J. (2009). Organizational socialization: The missing link between employee needs and organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(7), 650–676. DOI: 10.1108/02683940910989039
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tóth-Király, I., Morin, A. J., Bőthe, B., Rigó, A., & Orosz, G. (2021). Toward an improved understanding of work motivation profiles. Applied Psychology, 70(3), 986–1017. DOI: 10.1111/apps.12256
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van den Broeck, A., Lens, W., De Witte, H., & Van Coillie, H. (2013). Unraveling the importance of the quantity and the quality of workers’ motivation for well-being: A person-centered perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(1), 69–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2012.11.005
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Emmerik, H., Gardner, W. L., Wendt, H., & Fischer, D. (2010). Associations of culture and personality with McClelland’s motives: A cross-cultural study of managers in 24 countries. Group & Organization Management, 35(3), 329–367. DOI: 10.1177/1059601110370782
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2018). Person-environment fit: A review of its basic tenets. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 75–101. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104702
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vleugels, W., Verbruggen, M., De Cooman, R., Billsberry, J. (2022). A systematic review of temporal person-environment fit research: Trends, developments, obstacles, and opportunities for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1002/job.2607
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang, M.-C., Deng, Q., Bi, X., Ye, H., & Yang, W. (2017). Performance of the entropy as an index of classification accuracy in latent profile analysis: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(11), 1473–1482. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01473
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.220 | Journal eISSN: 2002-2867

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 14 - 14

Submitted on: Feb 17, 2023

Accepted on: Nov 23, 2023

Published on: Dec 27, 2023

Published by: Stockholm University Press

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

idiosyncratic deals,

individual needs,

needs-supplies fit,

latent profile analysis

© 2023 Annika Pestotnik, Sarah Altmann, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 8 (2023): Issue 1