Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Social media and digital platforms: polarization and hate speech Cover

References

  1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.
  2. Badouard, R. (2021). Modérer la parole sur les réseaux sociaux : Politiques des plateformes et régulation des contenus. Réseaux, 225(1), 87120. 10.3917/res.225.0087
  3. Baider, F., & Constantinou, M. (Éds.) (2019). Discours de haine dissimulée, discours alternatifs et contre-discours. Semen, 47. 10.4000/semen.12275
  4. Bleich, E. (2016). L’avènement des lois contre les discours et les crimes de haine dans les démocraties libérales (D. Ramond, Trad.). Raisons politiques, 63(3), 3549. 10.3917/rai.063.0035
  5. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. Routledge.
  6. Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social Media: Defining, Developing, and Divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 4665. 10.1080/15456870.2015.972282
  7. Droin, N. (2018). L’appréhension des discours de haine par les juridictions françaises : Entre travail d’orfèvre et numéro d’équilibriste. La Revue des droits de l’homme, 14, 116. 10.4000/revdh.4302
  8. Ermida, I. (Ed.). (2023). Hate Speech in Social Media: Linguistic Approaches. Routledge. 10.1007/978-3-031-38248-2
  9. Esposito, E., & Breeze, R. (2021). Gender and politics in a digitalised world: Investigating online hostility against UK female MPs. Discourse & Society, 33(3), 303323. 10.1177/09579265221076608
  10. Fersini, E., Nozza, D., & Rosso, P. (2018). Overview of the Evalita 2018 Task on Automatic Misogyny Identification (AMI). In T. Caselli, N. Novielli, V. Patti, & P. Rosso (Eds.), EVALITA Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian. Accademia University Press. 10.4000/books.aaccademia.4497
  11. Girard, C. (2014). Le droit et la haine : Liberté d’expression et « discours de haine » en démocratie. Raison publique. https://raison-publique.fr/735/
  12. Hornsby, J. (1993). Speech Acts and Pornography. Women’s Philosophy Review, 10, 3845. 10.5840/wpr19931021
  13. Konikoff, D. (2021). Gatekeepers of toxicity: Reconceptualizing Twitter’s abuse and hate speech policies. Policy & Internet, 13(4), 502521. 10.1002/poi3.265
  14. Lederer, L., & Delgado, R. (Eds.). (1995). The Price We Pay: The Case Against Racist Speech, Hate Propaganda, and Pornography. Hill and Wang.
  15. Longhi, J., & Vernet, S. (Eds.). (2023). La haine en ligne [Special issue]. Réseaux, 241(5). https://shs.cairn.info/revue-reseaux-2023-5?lang=fr
  16. Lorenzi Bailly, N., & Moïse, C. (Eds.). (2021). La haine en discours. Le Bord de l’eau.
  17. Macdonald, S., & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2020). Intentional and Performative Persuasion: The Linguistic Basis for Criminalizing the (Direct and Indirect) Encouragement of Terrorism. Criminal Law Forum, 31(4), 473512. 10.1007/s10609-020-09405-x
  18. Musolff, A. (2017). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. In M. Kopytowska (Ed.), Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres (pp. 4156). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/bct.93.02mus
  19. Nagle, J. C. (2009). The Idea of Pollution. UC Davis Law Review, 43, 176. https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/313
  20. Nicaud, B. (Éd.). (2023a). Discours de haine : état des lieux et approches. Mare & Martin.
  21. Nicaud, B. (2023b). La lutte contre les discours de haine sur les réseaux sociaux, In B. Nicaud (Ed.), Discours de haine : état des lieux et approches juridiques. Mare & Martin (pp. 199212).
  22. Paveau, M.-A. (2017). L’analyse du discours numérique. Dictionnaire des formes et des pratiques. Hermann.
  23. Prażmo, E. (2020). Fools are worse than animals: A cognitive linguistics analysis of dehumanizing metaphors in online discourse. Topics in Linguistics, 21(2), 1627. 10.2478/topling-2020-0007
  24. Raffone, A. (2022). “Her leg didn’t fully load in”: A digitally-mediated social-semiotic critical discourse analysis of disability hate speech on TikTok. International Journal of Language Studies, 16(4), 1742.
  25. Rosier, L. (2025). La Riposte : Les femmes et la violence verbale. Payot.
  26. Scharlaj, M. (2020). Language and Power in Discourses of Conflict. Peter Lang Verlag. Retrieved Aug 21, 2025, from 10.3726/b17399. 10.3726/b16841
  27. Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
  28. Sharifi, M., Ansari, N., & Asadollahzadeh, M. (2016). A critical discourse analytic approach to discursive construction of Islam in Western talk shows: The case of CNN talk shows. International Communication Gazette, 79(1), 4563. 10.1177/1748048516656301
  29. Smyrnaios, N., & Ratinaud, P. (2023). De la presse parisienne à la fachosphère : Genèse et diffusion du terme « islamo-gauchisme » dans l’espace public. Réseaux, 241(5), 163195. 10.3917/res.241.0163
  30. van Dijk, T. A. (2021). Antiracist Discourse: Theory and History of a Macromovement. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108956079
  31. Waseem, Z., & Hovy, D. (2016). Hateful Symbols or Hateful People? Predictive Features for Hate Speech Detection on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (pp. 8893). http://aclweb.org/anthology/N/N16/N16-2013.pdf
  32. Woods, F. A., & Ruscher, J. B. (2021). Viral sticks, virtual stones: addressing anonymous hate speech online. Patterns of Prejudice, 55(3), 265289. 10.1080/0031322X.2021.1968586
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/rnef.201 | Journal eISSN: 2003-0401
Language: English
Page range: 34 - 42
Submitted on: Feb 27, 2026
Accepted on: Mar 23, 2026
Published on: Apr 15, 2026
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Malin Roitman, Grégoire Lacaze, Christophe Premat, Françoise Sullet-Nylander, Samuel Vernet, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.