A Bit More than a Fly on the Wall: Roles and Responsibilities in Design-Based Research
By: Elisabeth Iversen and Guðrún Jónsdóttir
References
- Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in educational research. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X11428813
- Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
- Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing process and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
- Binder, A. J. (2002). Contentious curricula: Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Caplan, N. (1979). The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. American Behavioral Scientist, 22(3), 459–470. DOI: 10.1177/000276427902200308
- Christensen, O., Gynther, K., & Petersen, T. B. (2012). Design-based research: Introduction til en forskningsmetode i udvikling af nye E-læringskoncepter og didaktisk design medieret af digitale teknologier. [Design-based research: Introduction to a research methodology in development of new E-learning concepts and didactical designs media of digital technologies]. Læring & Medier (LOM), 9, 1–20 (in Danish). DOI: 10.7146/lom.v5i9.6140
- Coburn, C. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 343–379. DOI: 10.3102/00028312043003343
- Coburn, C. E., Bea, S., & Turner, E. O. (2008). Authority, status, and the dynamics of insider-outsider partnerships at the district level. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(3), 364–399. DOI: 10.1080/01619560802222350
- Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X032001005
- Doyle, W. (1986).
Classroom organization and management . In: Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 392–431. (3rd ed). New York, NY: Macmillan. - Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598–628. DOI: 10.1177/0959354311419252
- Erickson, F. (2012).
Qualitative research methods for science education . In: Fraser, B. J., Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education, 1041–1060. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_93 - Fägerstam, E., & Blom, J. (2012). Learning biology and mathematics outdoors: Effects and attitudes in a Swedish high school context. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 13(1), 56–75. DOI: 10.1080/14729679.2011.647432
- Glackin, M. (2016). ‘Risky fun’ or ‘Authentic science’? How teachers’ beliefs influence their practice during a professional development programme on outdoor learning. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 409–433. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1145368
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Gundersen, V., Skår, M., O’Brien, L., Wold, L. C., & Follo, G. (2016). Children and nearby nature: A nationwide parental survey from Norway. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 17, 116–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.04.002
- Jen, E., Moon, S., & Samarapungavan, A. (2015). Using design-based research in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(3), 190–200. DOI: 10.1177/0016986215583871
- Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2006). Design-based research in science education. Nordina, 4, 54–68.
- Ketelaars, P., Walgrave, S., & Wouters, R. (2014). Degrees of frame alignment: Comparing organisers’ and participants’ frames in 29 demonstrations in three countries. International Sociology, 29(6), 1–21. DOI: 10.1177/0268580914548286
- Kolmos, A. (2015).
Design-based research: Issues in connecting theory, research and practice . In Research in Engineering Education Symposium. Aungier St., Dublin Institute of Technology. - Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). London: SAGE publishing.
- Lee, K. (1993). The natural and the artefactual: The implications of deep science and deep technology for environmental philosophy. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
- Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical research: Planning and design (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Limited.
- Lorentzen, R. F. (2017).
Lærerens dilemma – mellem ideal og praksis. En virksomhedsteoretisk analyse af progressive undervisning med IT i dansk. [The teacher’s dilemma – between ideal and practice. An activity theory analysis of progressive teaching in IT in Danish.] (Doctoral dissertation, Aarhus University, Denmark.) (In Danish). - McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2006).
Design research from a curriculum perspective . In: van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.), Educational design research, 62–90. London: Routledge. - Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Brand.
- Penuel, W. R., Allen, A. R., Coburn, C., & Farrell, C. (2015). Conceptualizing research–practice partnership as joint work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 20(1–2), 182–197. DOI: 10.1080/10824669.2014.988334
- Penuel, W. R., Coburn, C. E., & Gallagher, D. J. (2013).
Negotiating problems of practice in research-practice partnerships . In: Fishman, B. J., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A. R., & Cheng, B. (Eds.), Design-based implementation research: Theories, methods, and exemplars, 237–255. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, New York: Teachers College Record. - Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Ckoi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Preston Montford, Shropshire: Field Study Council.
- Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.
- Snow, D. A., Burke Rochford, E.,
Jr. , Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. DOI: 10.2307/2095581 - Tsai, C. C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771–783. DOI: 10.1080/09500690110049132
- Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23. DOI: 10.1007/BF02504682
- Williams, R. H., & Kubal, T. J. (1999). Movement frames and the cultural environment: Resonance, failure, and the boundaries of the legitimate. Research in Social Movements: Conflicts and Change, 21, 225–248.
- X. (Forthcoming). Den undervisningsmessige verdien av uteundervisning. [The educational value of outdoor education]. NorDiNa. (In Norwegian).
- Zucker, L. (1991).
Postscripts: Microfoundations of institutional thought . In: Powell, W. W., & DeMaggio, P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, 103–106. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.79 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 18 - 28
Submitted on: Dec 20, 2016
Accepted on: Feb 21, 2018
Published on: Mar 22, 2018
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2018 Elisabeth Iversen, Guðrún Jónsdóttir, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.