Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Learning Design at Nordic and Baltic Universities Cover

Learning Design at Nordic and Baltic Universities

Open Access
|Sep 2025

References

  1. Aalborg University. (n.d.). Learning Design. https://www.cdul.aau.dk/learning-design
  2. Aalto University. (n.d.). Open-source tools for learning design. https://www.aalto.fi/en/news/how-to-design-courses-for-actual-learning-stepping-on-the-shoulders-of-other
  3. Aarhus University. (n.d.). University Pedagogical Programme. https://ced.au.dk/en/courses/university-pedagogical-programme
  4. Agostinho, S. (2011). The use of a visual learning design representation to support the design process of teaching in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6). 10.14742/ajet.923
  5. Bower, M. (2017). Design of technology-enhanced learning: Integrating research and practice. Emerald Publishing Limited. 10.1108/9781787141827
  6. Camacho, M. (2016). David Kelley: From design to design thinking at Stanford and IDEO. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2(1), 88101. 10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.009
  7. Conole, G. (2013). Tools and Resources to Guide Practice. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age. Designing for 21st Century Learning (pp. 78101). Routledge.
  8. Copenhagen Business School. (n.d.). Course design. https://teach.cbs.dk/resources/course-design/
  9. Cross, N. (2023). Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. 2nd edn. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. 10.5040/9781350305090
  10. Cross, S., Masson, A., O’Donnell, C., & Galley, R. (2011). Identifying and changing key curriculum design practices. Retrieved March 13, 2025, from http://www.online-conference.net/jisc/content2011/masson/Viewpoints_OULDI_FINAL.ppt
  11. Dalziel, J., et al. (2016). The Larnaca Declaration on Learning Design. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(7), 124. 10.5334/jime.407
  12. Damşa, C., & De Lange, T. (2019). Student-centred learning environments in higher education: From conceptualization to design. Uniped, 42(1), 926. 10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2019-01-02
  13. Design Council. (2003). The Double Diamond. Available at: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/the-double-diamond/ (Accessed: 15 April 2025).
  14. Dobozy, E., & Cameron, L. (2018). Special issue on learning design research: Mapping the terrain. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2). 10.14742/ajet.4390
  15. Eloranta, S., Sirviö, T., Ruotsalainen, A. L., & Säätelä, S. (2021). Service Design Thinking in Higher Education in Finland. The International Journal of Design Education, 16(1), 81. 10.18848/2325-128X/CGP/v16i01/81-89
  16. Fawns, T. (2022). An entangled pedagogy: Looking beyond the pedagogy—technology dichotomy. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(3), 711728. 10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7
  17. Godsk, M. (2018). Improving STEM Undergraduate Education with Efficient Learning Design. Open University (United Kingdom). 10.21954/ou.ro.0000d705
  18. Godsk, M. (2022a). Activity Profiler, Version 1. https://godsk.dk/activityprofiler
  19. Godsk, M. (2022b). Learning Design as an efficient educational development methodology: conceptualization, assessment, and practice. In Handbook of Digital Higher Education (pp. 3850). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  20. Godsk, M. (2023). DUT Guide: Learning Design as an educational development methodology. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 18(35). 10.7146/dut.v18i35.141522
  21. Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1). 10.14742/ajet.1344
  22. Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. Bmj, 331(7524), 10641065. 10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68
  23. Helsinki University. (n.d.). Learning Design. https://blogs.helsinki.fi/globalcampus/category/learning-design
  24. Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140153. 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
  25. Houde, S., & Hill, C. (1997). What do Prototypes Prototype? In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 367381). North-Holland. 10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50082-0
  26. Huhtanen, A. (2019). The Design Book for Online Learning – Practical Tools for Designing High-quality Online Learning. Aalto University/FITech Network University, 143. https://fitech.io/app/uploads/2019/09/The-Design-Book-for-Online-Learning-v-1.4.1-EN-web.pdf
  27. Kaliisa, R., & Dolonen, J. A. (2023). CADA: a teacher-facing learning analytics dashboard to foster teachers’ awareness of students’ participation and discourse patterns in online discussions [Article]. Technology, Knowledge & Learning, 28(3), 937958. 10.1007/s10758-022-09598-7
  28. Kaliisa, R., Kluge, A., & Mørch, A. I. (2020). Combining checkpoint and process learning analytics to support learning design decisions in blended learning environments. Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(3), 3347. 10.18608/jla.2020.73.4
  29. Kaliisa, R., Mørch, A. I., & Kluge, A. (2022). ‘My Point of Departure for Analytics is Extreme Skepticism’: Implications Derived from An Investigation of University Teachers’ Learning Analytics Perspectives and Design Practices. Technology, knowledge and learning, 27(2), 505527. 10.1007/s10758-020-09488-w
  30. Karolinska Institutet. (n.d.). Toolkit for designing assessments. https://ki.instructure.com/courses/90
  31. Kaunas University of Technology. (n.d.). Twente education model. https://www.utwente.nl/en/service-portal/educational-support/about-ut-education/twente-educational-model-tem
  32. Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., & Harper, B. (2008). Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies. IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-59904-861-1
  33. Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Mit Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6814.001.0001
  34. Malmö University. (n.d.). Flip and write. https://orwellproject.eu/flip-and-write/
  35. Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., … & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners. 10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
  36. Mor, Y., & Craft, B. (2012). Learning design: reflections upon the current landscape. Research in learning technology, 20. 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19196
  37. Open University. (2021). OU Learning Design Activity Types framework. https://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/learning-design/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/OU-LD-Activity-Types-Framework-October-2021-FINAL.pdf
  38. Saadatmand, M. (2017). Toward Open Networked Learning Environments: An Ecological Approach to Learning Design in MOOCs. In J. Johnston (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2017 (pp. 978981). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/178412/
  39. Simon, H. A. (1988). The science of design: Creating the artificial. Design Issues, 4(1/2), 6782. 10.2307/1511391
  40. Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams – an analysis of team communication. Design studies, 23(5), 473496. 10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00004-2
  41. Stockholm University. (n.d.). LD as a module of a university teaching course; ABC workshops. https://www.su.se/centrum-for-universitetslararutbildning/kalender/digitala-kompetenser-för-undervisning-1.668285; https://www.su.se/centre-for-the-advancement-of-university-teaching/calendar/abc-method-for-course-design-1.693405
  42. Tallinn University. (n.d.). Eduspace. https://eduspace.tlu.ee/en/digitally-transforming-teachers
  43. Tsai, C. C., & Chai, C. S. (2012). The “third”-order barrier for technology-integration instruction: Implications for teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6). 10.14742/ajet.810
  44. University of Copenhagen. (n.d.). ABC Learning Design. https://cobl.ku.dk/course-development/course-design/abc-learning-design/
  45. University of Iceland. (n.d.). ABC Workshops. https://setberg.hi.is/is/kennsla/abc-vinnustofur
  46. University of Jyväskylä. (n.d.). MultiLED Project. Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Learning Environment Design. https://www.jyu.fi/en/projects/multiled-project-multidisciplinary-perspectives-on-learning-environment-design
  47. University of Oulu. (n.d.). Innovating Learning Design in Higher Education; Workshop on learning design and innovative pedagogies. https://learning-design.eu/en/index; https://iled-project.eu/en/news/workshop-learning-design-and-innovative-pedagogies-held-university-oulu
  48. University of Stavanger. (n.d.). Learning design for flexible education (FLeD); Workshops on learning design and innovative pedagogies. https://www.uis.no/en/research/learning-design-for-flexible-education-fled; https://iled-project.eu/en/news/workshop-learning-design-and-innovative-pedagogies-held-university-oulu
  49. Young, C., & Perović, N. (2016). Rapid and Creative Course Design: as easy as ABC? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 390395. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.058
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.239 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 36 - 49
Submitted on: Sep 16, 2024
Accepted on: Aug 15, 2025
Published on: Sep 2, 2025
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Ola Knutsson, Mikkel Godsk, Kolbrún Friðriksdóttir, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.