Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Designing for Multilingual Conceptual Learning in Immersive VR environments: Teachers’ Didactical Strategies in Study Guidance Cover

Designing for Multilingual Conceptual Learning in Immersive VR environments: Teachers’ Didactical Strategies in Study Guidance

Open Access
|Sep 2025

References

  1. Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023). Implications of virtual reality (VR) for school teachers and instructional designers: An empirical investigation. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2260676. 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2260676
  2. Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2020). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Principles and Practices of Design (3rd ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351252805
  3. Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: a social semiotic frame. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315687537
  4. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347364. 10.1007/BF00138871
  5. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 4th edn. Open University Press.
  6. Chang, H., Park, J., & Suh, J. (2024). Virtual reality as a pedagogical tool: An experimental study of English learner in lower elementary grades. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 48094842. 10.1007/s10639-023-11988-y
  7. Chen, B., Wang Y., & Wang, L. (2022). The Effects of Virtual Reality-Assisted Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Sustainability, 14, 3147. 10.3390/su14063147
  8. Conrad, M., Kablitz, D., & Schumann, S. (2024). Learning effectiveness of immersive virtual reality in education and training: A systematic review of findings. Computers & Education: X Reality, 4, 100053. 10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100053
  9. Cummins, J. (2018). Urban Multilingualism and Educational Achievement: Identifying and Implementing Evidence-Based Strategies for School Improvement. In P. Van Avermaet, S. Slembrouck, K. Van Gorp, S. Sierens & K. Maryns (Eds.), The Multilingual Edge of Education (pp. 6790). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978-1-137-54856-6_4
  10. Cviko, A., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2015). Teachers as co-designers of technology-rich learning activities for early literacy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(4), 443459. 10.1080/1475939X.2014.953197
  11. Dávila, L., & Bunar, N. (2020). Translanguaging through an advocacy lens: The roles of multilingual classroom assistants in Sweden. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 107126. 10.1515/eujal-2019-0012
  12. Ding, A.-C. E. (2024). Supporting multilingual learners’ science learning from the multimodal perspective: the case of a VR-Enhanced science unit. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 56(6), 788808. 10.1080/15391523.2023.2221871
  13. Duek, S. (2017). Med andra ord. Samspel och villkor för litteracitet bland nyanlända barn. Karlstads universitet.
  14. Elliott, J. (2020). Principles and Methods for the conduct of Case Studies in School-based Educational Action Research. In E. Anderberg (Ed.), Skolnära forskningsmetoder (pp. 111141). Studentlitteratur.
  15. Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, A., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task- Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108643689
  16. Engblom, C., & Fallberg, K. (2018). Nyanländas lärande och språkutvecklande arbetssätt. Rapport från en forskningscirkel. Uppsala universitet.
  17. Fritzsche, B., & Kakos, M. (2021). Multilingual Teaching Assistants in the UK: Translators in the Field of Inclusive Education. In A. Köpfer, J. Powell & R. Zahnd (Eds.), International Handbook on Inclusion: Global, National and Local Perspectives on Inclusive Education (pp. 453469). Barbara Budrich. 10.2307/j.ctv1f70kvj.27
  18. Fryer, L. K., Coniam, D., Carpenter, R., & Lăpușneanu, D. (2020). Bots for language learning now: Current and future directions. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 822. 10.64152/10125/44719
  19. Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). Evolving technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 626. 10.64152/10125/73443
  20. González-Lloret, M. (2019). Technology and L2 Pragmatics Learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 113127. 10.1017/S0267190519000047
  21. Hajer, M., & Meestringa, T. (2014). Språkinriktad undervisning: En handbok [Language-based education: A handbook] (2nd ed.). Hallgren & Fallgren.
  22. Jakobsson, A., & Kouns, M. (2023). Subject-language perspectives on multilingual students learning in science. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 197214. 10.30935/scimath/12568
  23. Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 15151529. 10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0
  24. Karlsson, A., Nygård Larsson, P., & Jakobsson, A. (2020). The continuity of learning in a translanguaging science classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(1), 115. 10.1007/s11422-019-09933-y
  25. Krogh, E., Qvortrup, A., & Ting Graf, S. (Eds.) (2021). Didaktik and Curriculum in Ongoing Dialogue. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003099390
  26. Legault, J., Zhao, J., Chi, Y.-A., Chen, W., Klippel, A., & Li, P. (2019). Immersive virtual reality as an effective tool for second language vocabulary learning. Languages, 4(1), 13. 10.3390/languages4010013
  27. Lin, X. P., Li, B. B., Yao, Z. N., Yang, Z., & Zhang, M. (2024). The impact of virtual reality on student engagement in the classroom-a critical review of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1360574. 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360574
  28. Liu, R., Wang, L., Lei, J., Wang, Q., & Ren, Y. (2020). Effects of an immersive virtual reality-based classroom on students’ learning performance in science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 20342049. 10.1111/bjet.13028
  29. Lyle, J. (2003) Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861878. 10.1080/0141192032000137349
  30. Maas, M. J., & Hughes, J. M. (2020). Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K-12 education: a review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 231249. 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737210
  31. Majgaard, G., Misfeldt, M., & Nielsen, J. (2011). How design-based research and action research contribute to the development of a new design for learning. Designs for learning, 4(2), 827. 10.16993/dfl.38
  32. Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 122. 10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2
  33. Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual Reality in Education: A Review of Learning Theories, Approaches and Methodologies for the Last Decade. Electronics, 12(13), 2832. 10.3390/electronics12132832
  34. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting Educational Design Research. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315105642
  35. Meri-Yilan, S. (2019). A Constructivist Desktop Virtual Reality-Based Approach to Learning in a Higher Education Institution. In K. Becnel (Ed.), Emerging Technologies in Virtual Learning Environments. IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-5225-7987-8.ch013
  36. Mills, K., Jass Ketelhut, D., & Gong, X. (2019). Change of teacher beliefs, but not practices, following integration of immersive virtual environment in the classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 17861811. 10.1177/0735633119854034
  37. Parmaxi, A. (2023). Virtual reality in language learning: a systematic review and implications for research and practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 172184. 10.1080/10494820.2020.1765392
  38. Poupard, M., Larrue, F., Sauzéon, H., & Tricot, A. (2025). A systematic review of immersive technologies for education: effects of cognitive load and curiosity state on learning performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(1), 541. 10.1111/bjet.13503
  39. Reath Warren, A. (2016). Multilingual study guidance in the Swedish compulsory school and the development of multilingual literacies. Nordand, 11(2),115142.
  40. Rosén, J., Straszer, B., & Wedin, Å. (2020). Användning av språkliga resurser i studiehandledning på modersmålet. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 25(2–3), 2648. 10.15626/pfs25.0203.02
  41. Roux Sparreskog, C. (2023). Pedagogical collaboration for multilingual support in Swedish compulsory schools – multilingual study guidance tutors’ perspectives. Language and Education, (ahead-of-print), 118. 10.1080/09500782.2023.2226365
  42. Rubin, M. (2019). Språkliga redskap – Språklig beredskap: en praktiknära studie om elevers ämnesspråkliga deltagande i ljuset av inkluderande undervisning. Malmö universitet.
  43. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Academic Language in Teaching and Learning. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 40918. 10.1086/663297
  44. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions (Vol. 1.). Jossey-Bass.
  45. Selander, S. (2022). Designs in and for learning: A theoretical framework. In L. Björklund Boistrup & S. Selander (Red.), Designs for research, teaching and learning: A Framework for future Education (pp. 122). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003096498-1
  46. Skolinspektionen. (2017). Studiehandledning på modersmålet i årskurs 79. https://www.skolinspektionen.se/beslut-rapporter/publikationer/kvalitetsgranskning/2017/studiehandledning-pa-modersmalet-i-arskurs-79/
  47. Skolverket. (2023). Studiehandledning på modersmålet: att stödja kunskapsutvecklingen hos flerspråkiga elever. Skolverket. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=11363
  48. Sofkova Hashemi, S. (2022). Exploring Educational Designs by Schematic Models: Visualizing Educational Value and Critical Issues of Recognition and Socio-Material Frames. Designs for Learning, 14(1), 1428. 10.16993/dfl.171
  49. Sofkova Hashemi, S., & Spante, M. (2016). Den didaktiska designens betydelse: IT-didaktiska modeller och ramvillkor [The significance of didactic design: IT-didactic models and frames]. In Kollaborativ undervisning i digital skolmiljö (pp. 125135), Gleerups.
  50. Soto, J. H. B., Ocampo, D. C. T., del Carmen Beltrán Colón, L., & Oropesa, A. V. (2020). Perceptions of Immerseme virtual reality platform to improve English communicative skills in higher education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(7), 419. 10.3991/IJIM.V14I07.12181
  51. Sun, Y. H. (2017). Design for CALL – possible synergies between CALL and design for learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 575599. 10.1080/09588221.2017.1329216
  52. Swedish Research Council. (2024). Good Research Practice 2024. https://www.vr.se/english/analysis/reports/our-reports/2025-07-03-good-research-practice-2024.html
  53. Sydorenko, T., Daurio, P., & Thorne, S. L. (2018). Refining pragmatically-appropriate oral communication via computer-simulated conversations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 157180. 10.1080/09588221.2017.1394326
  54. Yildirim, B., Sahin-Topalcenqiz, E., Arikan, G., & Timur, S. (2020). Using virtual reality in the classroom: reflections of STEM teachers on the use of teaching and learning tools. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 6(3), 231245. 10.21891/jeseh.711779
  55. Żammit, J. (2023). Exploring the effectiveness of Virtual Reality in teaching Maltese. Computers & Education: X Reality, 3, 100035. 10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100035
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.236 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 50 - 63
Submitted on: Aug 28, 2024
Accepted on: Sep 11, 2025
Published on: Sep 19, 2025
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Sylvana Sofkova Hashemi, Emma Edstrand, Jeanette Sjöberg, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.