Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Enhancing Knowledge Representations and Student Agency: A Study on Digital Assessment Designs in Higher Education Cover

Enhancing Knowledge Representations and Student Agency: A Study on Digital Assessment Designs in Higher Education

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed). Longman.
  2. Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139087315
  3. Aubusson, P., & Schuck, S. (2013). Teacher education futures: Today’s trends, tomorrow’s expectations. Teacher Development, 17(3), 322333. 10.1080/13664530.2013.813768
  4. Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Bennett, S., Hall, M., Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Joughin, G. (2017). How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study. Higher education, 74, 4964. 10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7
  5. Bearman, M., Ju Nieminen, J. H., & Ajjawia, R. (2023). Designing assessment in a digital world: an organising framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Educational, 48(3), 291304. 10.1080/02602938.2022.2069674
  6. Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy E., & Boud, D. (2017). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 672682. 10.1111/bjet.12439
  7. Blom, T. (2009). Formell kunskap och praktiskt hantverk i samverkan inom akademien—En (o)möjlig ekvation? In A.-K. Högman & M. Stolare (Eds.), I lärandets gränsland. Gidlunds Förlag.
  8. Boistrup, L. B., & Selander, S. (Eds.) (2022). Designs for research, teaching and learning. A framework for future education. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003096498
  9. Bornemark, J. (2020). Horisonten finns alltid kvar: om det bortglömda omdömet. Volante.
  10. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652661. 10.1177/1744987120927206
  11. Chase, A.-M., Ross, B., & Robbie, D. (2017). Improving Digital Assessment Practice: A Case Study of a Cross-Institutional Initiative. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 14(2). 10.53761/1.14.2.5
  12. Chirumamilla, A., & Sindre, G. (2017). E-exams in Norwegian higher education: Vendors and managers views on reguirements in a digital ecosystem perspective. Computers & Education, 172. 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104263
  13. Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2021). Multimodal text in disciplinary education. A comprehensive framework. Springer Nature. 10.1007/978-3-030-63960-0
  14. Durning, S. J., Dong, T., Ratcliffe, T., Schuwirth, L., Artino, A. R., Boulet, J. R., & Eva, K. (2016). Comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: a systematic review. Acad. Med., 91, 583599. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000977
  15. Eteläpelto, A., Väshäsantanen, K., Hökkä, O., Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 4565. 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
  16. Heikkilä, M., Hermansen, H., Iiskala, T., Mikkilä-Erdmann M., & Warinowski, A. (2023). Epistemic agency in student teachers’ engagement with research skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 455472. 10.1080/13562517.2020.1821638
  17. Higher Education Ordinance, 1993:100. Ministry of Education.
  18. Johanns, B., Dinkens A., & Moore, J. (2017). A systematic review comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: Evaluating effects on development of critical thinking skills. Nurse Education in Practice, 27, 8994. 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.018
  19. Kullenberg, T., Eklöf, A., & Nilsson, L.-E. (2023). Gymnasieelevers kontextuella meningsskapande – agens i teori och praktik. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 28(4), 192218. 10.15626/pfs28.04.08
  20. Lindstrand, F. (2022). A semiotic and design-oriented approach to affordance. In L. B. Boistrup & S. Selander (Eds.), Designs for research, teaching and learning. A framework for future education. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003096498-3
  21. Macfarlane, B. (2017). Freedom to learn: the threat to student academic freedom and why it needs to be reclaimed. Routledge. 10.1007/s10734-016-0089-6
  22. Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping Concepts of Agency in Educational Contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420446. 10.1007/s12124-015-9336-0
  23. Nieminen, J. H., Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Designing the digital in authentic assessment: is it fit for purpose? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(4), 529543. 10.1080/02602938.2022.2089627
  24. Nieminen, J. H., & Lahdenperä, J. (2021). Assessment and epistemic (in)justice: how assessment produces knowledge and knowers. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(1), 300317. 10.1080/13562517.2021.1973413
  25. Ørevik, S. (2023). Assessing Students’ Multimodal Texts in the Subject of English: Synthesising Peers’ and Teachers’ Recognition of Semiotic Work. Designs for Learning, 15(1), 4457. 10.16993/dfl.216
  26. Pargman, T. C., Sporring, E., Farazouli, A., & McGrath, C. (2024). Beyond the Hype: Towards a Critical Debate About AI in Swedish Higher Education. Högre Utbildning, 14(1), 7481. 10.23865/hu.v14.6243
  27. Park, K.-Y., Park, H.-K., Hwang, H.-S., Yoo, S.-H., Ryu, J.-S., & Kim, J.-H. (2021). Improved detection of patient centeredness in objective structured clinical examinations through authentic scenario design. Patient Education and Counseling, 104, 10941099. 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.016
  28. Robertson, D. A., Padesky, L. B., & Brook, C. H. (2020). Cultivating student agency through teachers’professional learning. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 192201. 10.1080/00405841.2019.1705090
  29. Ross, J., Curwood, J. S., & Bell, A. (2020). A multimodal assessment framework for higher education. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(4), 290306. 10.1177/2042753020927201
  30. Selander, S. (2022). Designs in and for learning – a theoretical framework. In L. B. Boistrup & S. Selander (Eds.), Designs for research, teaching and learning. A framework for future education. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003096498-1
  31. Selander, S., & Kress, G. (2010). Designs för lärande – Ett multimodalt perspektiv. Norstedts.
  32. Sjöberg, L. (2019). The Swedish primary teacher education programme: at the crossroads between two education programme traditions. Education Inquiry, 10(2), 116133. 10.1080/20004508.2018.1492845
  33. Stowell, J. R. (2015). Online open-book testing in face-to-face classes. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 713. 10.1037/stl0000014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.234 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 75 - 87
Submitted on: Aug 21, 2024
Accepted on: Sep 24, 2025
Published on: Oct 16, 2025
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Eva Svärdemo Åberg, Eva Edman Stålbrandt, Anna Wiik, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.