Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Cultural-Historical Perspective on How Double Stimulation Triggers Expansive Learning: How Teachers and Social Educators Can Use Double Stimulation to Implement Computational Thinking in Mathematics Cover

A Cultural-Historical Perspective on How Double Stimulation Triggers Expansive Learning: How Teachers and Social Educators Can Use Double Stimulation to Implement Computational Thinking in Mathematics

By:  and    
Open Access
|Nov 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

The double stimulation model of the emergence of volitional action (Sannino, 2015), based on Vygotsky’s (1997) text on self-control.

Table 1

Summary of the Change Laboratory sessions.

DATEPURPOSE OF THE SESSIONFIRST STIMULI SECOND STIMULI
3.9.2019Workshop 1
Introduction to CT in mathematics at K-2 level.
25.9.2019Session 1
  • Presentation of CHAT as a method.

  • Historical analysis of structures related to CT in mathematics.

  • Modelling new solutions.

The educational staff’s digital competence.Expansive learning cycle.
13.11.2019Session 2
  • Presentation of field observations.

  • Barrier and potentials of using digital artefacts.

  • Modelling new solutions.

Analog artefact. Preparation of teaching. Technology as a supporting artefact.Activity theory triangle, 1st generation.
29.1.2020Session 3
  • CT concepts and the use in mathematics.

  • Analysis of the new model.

  • Modelling new solutions.

New ways of teaching.
Problem-solving in Scratch Jr.
CT-concepts.
Activity theory triangle, 2nd generation.
1.9.2020Workshop 2
Introduction to CT in mathematics a K-3 level.
21.10.2020Session 4
  • Presentation of the educational staff’s expansive learning cycle.

  • Analysis of the new model through a didactical perspective.

Students’ development of mathematical learning in Scratch Jr. CT development in traditional math teaching.Expansive learning cycle. Didactical cycle.
2.12.2020Session 5
  • Presentation of how CT emerges in the new model.

  • Examining the new model and modelling new solutions.

How CT emerges in the new model.Didactical cycle. Activity theory triangle. 2nd generation
Figure 2

The ideal-typical cycle of expansive learning (Engeström, 2015).

Phase 1a problem related to the object of the activity, or the unit of analysis observed by the researcher or the participant
Phase 2a conflict of motives articulated by the researcher or the participant and dealing with the object of the activity
Phase 3a possible auxiliary motive that helps to overcome the problem in Phases 1 or 2 such as an idea or a concept, etc.
Phase 4a plan for implementation of the model, which could be coordination of the process or who should complete certain tasks related to the object of the activity.
Table 2

Quotes that capture Apparatus 1 and the expansive learning action.

PHASEQUOTELEARNING ACTIONCL SESSIONSPEAKING TURN
1It was troublesome. I agree that the student should program the robot, but it should not be challenging to add two numbers together.Questioning1128
It’s just when we have no more hours left for preparation; then we have to stop the project. It’s no longer than that if he (the headmaster) has chosen that we should do it.Questioning2156
Phase 2For some, there is a lack between the two robots (Beebot and Ozobot) to the mathematical content.Analysing250
At least I wish we had more collective preparation hours and more math lessons together (the educational staff becomes aware that it becomes easier to create meaningful tasks together).Analysing3271
Phase 3Should we try to look at what it might look like if you were to work with these BeeBots, for example?Modelling1163
Can we use a diary?Reflection3300
Phase 4I’m writing straight away to her (the teacher had to write to a mom to get some material for a task).Modelling1212
We promise. Or so I promise.Analysing5237
Table 3

Summary of the result of expansive learning action and the four phases of Apparatus 1.

LEARNING ACTIONSSESSION 1SESSION 2SESSION 3SESSION 4SESSION 5TOTALTOTAL OCCURRENCES IN %
Question54320146,2
Analysis25192017179843,4
Modelling1456694017,7
Examining174772611,5
Implementation04411113113,7
Reflection13725188,0
Consolidation0000000
Learning action total4642444549226
Non learning action221218
Apparatus 1
Phase 111142111157233,6
Phase 299176115224,8
Phase 312101511186630,8
Phase 4435292310,7
Figure 3

Learning action through the five CL-sessions.

Figure 4

The four phases in Apparatus 1 through the five CL-sessions.

Figure 5

The connection between the Apparatus 1 and expansive learning action.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.206 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 151 - 164
Submitted on: Dec 12, 2021
Accepted on: Sep 27, 2022
Published on: Nov 1, 2022
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Camilla Kaup, Eva Brooks, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.