The Problem-identification Process Prior to the Initiation of a Networked Improvement Community
By: Julie Kallio
References
- Apple, M. (1985). Teaching and “Women’s Work”: A Comparative Historical and Ideological Analysis. Teachers College Record, 86(3): 455–473. DOI: 10.1177/016146818508600306
- Baer, M., Dirks, K. T., & Nickerson, J. A. (2013). Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 197–214. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2004
- Baron, K. (2017, May 5). Five Years & 20,000 Students: How a NIC Succeeded Where Others Failed. Retrieved February 25, 2020, from
https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/blog/five-years-20000-students-how-a-nic-succeeded-where-others-failed/ - Biesta, G. J. J. (2007). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 295–301. DOI: 10.1080/13803610701640227
- Blomberg, J., & Karasti, H. (2012).
Ethnography: Positioning Ethnography within Participatory Design . In: J. Simonsen & T. Robertson (Eds.) Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. - Boling, E. (2010). The Need for Design Cases: Disseminating Design Knowledge. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 1–8. Retrieved from
http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ijdl/index . DOI: 10.14434/ijdl.v1i1.919 - Bryk, A. S., & Gomez, L. M. (2007). Ruminations on reinventing an R&D capacity for educational improvement. The future of educational entrepreneurship: Possibilities of school reform (pp. 181–206).
- Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., & Grunow, A. (2011). Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education. Frontiers in sociology of education, 1, 127–162. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1576-9_7
- Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Bullen, C. V., & Bennett, J. L. (1990, September). Learning from user experience with groupware. In Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 291–302). DOI: 10.1145/99332.99362
- Cain, T. (2015). Teachers’ engagement with research texts: Beyond instrumental, conceptual or strategic use. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(5), 478–492. DOI: 10.1080/02607476.2015.1105536
- Cannata, M., Cohen-Vogel, L., & Sorum, M. (2017). Partnering for improvement: Improvement communities and their role in scale up. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(5), 569–588. DOI: 10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368633
- City, E. A., Elmore, R. F., Fiarman, S. E., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X032001009
- Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research-Practice Partnerships in Education: Outcomes, Dynamics, and Open Questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1). DOI: 10.3102/0013189X16631750
- Crow, R., Hinnant-Crawford, B. N., & Spaulding, D. T. (Eds.). (2019).
The Educational Leader’s Guide to Improvement Science: Data, Design and Cases for Reflection . Stylus Publishing, LLC. - DiSalvo, B., & DiSalvo, C. (2014). Designing for democracy in education: Participatory design and the learning sciences. Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- DiSalvo, B., Yip, J., Bonsignore, E., & Carl, D. (2017). Participatory design for learning. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315630830
- Donovan, S. (2011, April). The SERP approach to research, design, and development: A different role for research and researchers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
- Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 237–251. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X15584327
- García, E. (2014).
The need to address noncognitive skills in the education policy agenda . Economic Policy Institute Briefing Paper #386, Washington DC. Retrieved from:www.epi.org . - Gomez, L. M., Russell, J. L., Bryk, A. S., LeMahieu, P. G., & Mejia, E. M. (2016). The right network for the right problem. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(3), 8–15. DOI: 10.1177/0031721716677256
- Halverson, R. (2002).
Representing phronesis: Supporting instructional leadership practice in schools (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University). - Halverson, R., Barnicle, A., Hackett, S., Rawat, T., Rutledge, J., Kallio, J., Mould, C., & Mertes, J. (2015). Personalization in practice: Observations from the field. Working Paper. Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
- Harris, K. J., Jerome, N. W., & Fawcett, S. B. (1997). Rapid assessment procedures: a review and critique. Human Organization, 56(3), 375–378. DOI: 10.17730/humo.56.3.w525025611458003
- Holtzblatt, K., & Jones, S. (1993).
Contextual inquiry: A participatory design technique for system design . In: D. Schuler & A. Namioka, (Eds). Participatory Design: Principles and practices. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. - Jacobson, M., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex Systems in Education: Scientific and Educational Importance and Implications for the Learning Sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11–34. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4
- Kivel, L. (2015). The Problem with Solutions
https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/blog/the-problem-with-solutions/ - Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J., & Wensveen, S. (2011). Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385502-2.00006-7
- Labaree, D. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American educational research journal, 34(1), 39–81. DOI: 10.3102/00028312034001039
- Lawson, B. (2004). Schemata, gambits and precedent: some factors in design expertise. Design studies, 25(5), 443–457. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.001
- LeMahieu, P. G., Bryk, A. S., Grunow, A., & Gomez, L. M. (2017). Working to improve: seven approaches to improvement science in education, Quality Assurance in Education, 25(1), 2–4. DOI: 10.1108/QAE-12-2016-0086
- Mintrop, R., & Zumpe, E. (2016).
Defining and Framing Problems of Practice , in R. Mintrop, Design-based school improvement: A practical guide for education leaders. Harvard Education Press. - Muller, M. J., & Druin, A. (2007).
Participatory design: the third space in HCI . In The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1087–1108). CRC press. DOI: 10.1201/9781410615862.ch54 - Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Nickerson, J., Yen, C. J., & Mahoney, J. T. (2012). Exploring the problem-finding and problem-solving approach for designing organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1). DOI: 10.5465/amp.2011.0106
- Penuel, W. R., Allen, A. R., Coburn, C. E., & Farrell, C. (2015). Conceptualizing research–practice partnerships as joint work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 20(1–2), 182–197. DOI: 10.1080/10824669.2014.988334
- Philip, T. M., Bang, M., & Jackson, K. (2018). Articulating the “how,” the “for what,” the “for whom,” and the “with whom” in concert: A call to broaden the benchmarks of our scholarship. Cognition & Instruction, 36(2), 83–88. DOI: 10.1080/07370008.2018.1413530
- Roegman, R., & Woulfin, S. (2019). Got theory?: Reconceptualizing the nature of the theory- practice gap in K-12 educational leadership, Journal of Educational Administration, 57(1), 2–20. DOI: 10.1108/JEA-01-2018-0002
- Russell, J. L., Bryk, A. S., Dolle, J., Gomez, L. M., LeMahieu, P., & Grunow, A. (2017). A Framework for the Initiation of Networked Improvement Communities. Teachers College Record, 119(7). DOI: 10.1177/016146811711900501
- Rutledge, J. (2017).
Measuring What Matters: How Noncognitive Skills are Captured, Stored, and Utilized in Personalized Learning Environments . [Doctoral Dissertation]. The University of Wisconsin-Madison. - Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. CRC Press.
- Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational researcher, 32(1), 25–28. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X032001025
- Stokes, D. E. (2011).
Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation . Brookings Institution Press. - von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2016). Identifying Viable “Need–Solution Pairs”: Problem Solving Without Problem Formulation. Organization Science 2016, 27(1), 207–221. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2015.1023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.186 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 58 - 71
Submitted on: Aug 20, 2021
Accepted on: May 15, 2022
Published on: May 30, 2022
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2022 Julie Kallio, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.