Problems and Solutions in Researching Computer Game Assisted Dialogues for Persons with Aphasia
By: Ylva Backman, Viktor Gardelli and Peter Parnes
References
- Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V., & Strömberg, C. (2020). Group Argumentation Development through Philosophical Dialogues for Persons with Acquired Brain Injuries. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 67(1), 107–123. DOI: 10.1080/1034912X.2019.1681377
- Backman, Y., Gardelli, V., & Parnes, P. (2021). Game Technologies to Assist Learning of Communication Skills in Dialogic Settings for Persons with Aphasia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(03), 190–205. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v16i03.17889
- Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Hoist, M., & Ståhlbröst, A. (2009). Concept Design with a Living Lab Approach. 42nd Hawaii Int. Conf on System Sciences, USA, 2009, pp. 1–10.
- Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., & Campbell, P. (2016). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 24(958), 314. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4
- Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. OUP.
- Feurstein, K., Hesmer, A., Hribernik, K. A., Thoben, K.-D., & Schumacher, J. (2008).
Living Labs: A New Development Strategy . In J. Schumacher and V. P. Niitamo (Eds.). European Living Labs – A New Approach for Human Centric Regional Innovation. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag. pp. 1–14. - Gardelli, V. (2016). To Describe, Transmit or Inquire: Ethics and technology in school. Luleå University of Technology.
- Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & See, B. H. (2015). Philosophy for Children. EEF.
- Lee, J. B., & Azios, J. H. (2020). Facilitator Behaviors Leading to Engagement and Disengagement in Aphasia Conversation Groups. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(1S), 393–411.20. DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0220
- Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education. CUP. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511840272
- Markopoulos, P., & Rauterberg, G. W. M. (2000).
Living Lab: A White Paper . In IPO Annual Progress Report. pp. 53–65. - Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. (2017). The Most Reasonable Answer. HEP.
- Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2021). The Argumentation Rating Tool. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106(October 2021), 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103464
- Reznitskaya, A., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Oyler, J., Bourdage-Reninger, K., & Sykes, A. (2016). Using the Argumentation Rating Tool to support teacher facilitation of inquiry dialogue in elementary language arts classrooms. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, DC.
- Topping, K. J., & Trickey, S. (2007a). Collaborative philosophical enquiry for school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 271–288. DOI: 10.1348/000709906X105328
- Topping, K. J., & Trickey, S. (2007b). Impact of philosophical enquiry on school students’ interactive behaviour. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(2), 73–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2007.03.001
- Trickey, S., & Topping, K. J. (2004). “Philosophy for children”: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365–380. DOI: 10.1080/0267152042000248016
- UNESCO. (2007). Philosophy: A school of freedom. Author.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.185 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 46 - 51
Submitted on: Aug 15, 2021
Accepted on: Feb 21, 2022
Published on: Mar 16, 2022
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2022 Ylva Backman, Viktor Gardelli, Peter Parnes, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.