Students’ Meaning-Making of Nutrient Uptake in Relation to Organizational Levels
References
- Airey, J. (2015). Social Semiotics in Higher Education: Examples from teaching and learning in undergraduate physics. In: SACF Singapore-Sweden Excellence Seminars, Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research in Higher Education (STINT), 2015 (pp. 103).
- Airey, J., & Eriksson, U. (2019). Unpacking the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram: A Social Semiotic Analysis of the Disciplinary and Pedagogical Affordances of a Central Resource in Astronomy. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 99–107. DOI: 10.16993/dfl.137
- Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52. DOI: 10.1080/03057269608560077
- Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2009). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 27–49. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20265
- Assaraf, O. B. Z., Dodick, J., & Tripto, J. (2013). High school students’ understanding of the human body system. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 33–56. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-011-9245-2
- Barnett, J. (1992). Language in the science Classroom: Some issues for Teachers. The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 38(4), 8–13.
- Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2011). Investigating and theorizing discourse during analogy writing in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 771–792. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20428
- Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195. DOI: 10.1177/0741088307313177
- Bohlin, G., Göransson, A., Höst, G. E., & Tibell, L. A. (2017). A conceptual characterization of online videos explaining natural selection. Science & Education, 26(7), 975–999. DOI: 10.1007/s11191-017-9938-7
- Broman, K., Ekborg, M., & Johnels, D. (2011). Chemistry in crisis? Perspectives on teaching and learning chemisry in Swedish upper secondary scool. NorDiNa, 7(1), 43–60. DOI: 10.5617/nordina.245
- Cakici, Y. (2005). Exploring Turkish upper primary level pupils’ understanding of digestion. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 79–100. DOI: 10.1080/0950069032000052036
- Carvalho, G. S., Silva, R., Lima, N., Coquet, E., & Clément, P. (2004). Portuguese primary school children’s conceptions about digestion: Identification of learning obstacles. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1111–1130. DOI: 10.1080/0950069042000177235
- Chandrasegaran, A., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2011). Facilitating High School Students’ Use of Multiple Representations to Describe and Explain Simple Chemical Reactions. Teaching Science, 57(4), 13–20.
- Cokelez, A. (2012). Junior high school students’ ideas about the shape and size of the atom. Research in Science Education, 42(4), 673–686. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-011-9223-8
- Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Designs for social futures. Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 203–234).
- Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2016). Reading multimodal texts for learning – A model for cultivating multimodal literacy. Designs for Learning, 8(1), 25–36. DOI: 10.16993/dfl.72
- Garcia-Barros, S., Martínez-Losada, C., & Garrido, M. (2011). What do children aged four to seven know about the digestive system and the respiratory system of the human being and of other animals? International Journal of Science Education, 33(15), 2095–2122. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2010.541528
- Granklint Enochson, P. (2008). Elevers föreställningar om kroppens organ och kroppens hälsa utifrån ett skolsammanhang (Doctoral dissertation, Linköping university).
- Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International journal of science education, 22(9), 1011–1026. DOI: 10.1080/095006900416884
- Heinrich, S., & Kupers, R. (2019). Complexity as a Big Idea for Secondary Education: Evaluating a Complex Systems Curriculum, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36(1) 100–110. DOI: 10.1002/sres.2547
- Hipkiss, A. M. (2014). Klassrummets semiotiska resurser. En språkdidaktisk studie av skolämnena hem- och konsumentkunskap, kemi och biologi. (Doktorsavhandling), Umeå universitet, Umeå.
- Jacobsen, M. J., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The Design of Hypermedia Tools for Learning: Fostering Conceptual Change and Transfer of Complex Scientific Knowledge, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 145–199. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0902_2
- Jahic Pettersson, A., Danielsson, K., & Rundgren, C.-J. (2020). ‘Traveling nutrients’: how students use metaphorical language to describe digestion and nutritional uptake. International Journal of Science Education. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2020.1756514
- Jahic Pettersson, A., Danielsson, K. & Rundgren, C.-J. (forthcoming) The affordances of metaphors in meaning-making of nutrient uptake in middle school.
- Jahic Pettersson, A., Tibell, L., & Löfgren, R. (2021). ‘The brain needs nutrition’: pupils’ connections between organizational levels. NorDiNa, 17(1), 48–63. DOI: 10.5617/nordina.7930
- Jenkinson. 2012. Visualizing the Complexity of the Molecular World: Examining the Role of Animated Representations in the Development of Undergraduate Students’ Understanding of Dynamic Cellular Events, Thesis, Toronto University.
http://hdl.handle.net/1807/32748 - Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J. J., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315638027
- Jördens, J., Asshoff, R., Kullmann, H., & Hammann, M. (2016). Providing vertical coherence in explanations and promoting reasoning across levels of biological organization when teaching evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 960–992. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1174790
- Klein, P. D., & Kirkpatrick, L. C. (2010). Multimodal literacies in science: Currency, coherence and focus. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 87–92. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-009-9159-4
- Knippels, M. C. P. J. (2002). Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education: The yo-yo learning and teaching strategy. (Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University).
- Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205–226. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00021-X
- Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105–143. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0902_1
- Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
- Lemke, J. (1998). Teaching all the languages of science: words, symbols, images and actions.
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. London: Ablex Publishing.
- Meijer, M. (2011). Macro-meso-micro thinking with structure-property relations for chemistry education: an explorative design based study. (Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University).
- Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
- NTA Skolutveckling. (26 april 2021). Tema kroppen.
https://ntaskolutveckling.nu/teman/kroppen/ - Olander, C. (2009). Towards an interlanguage of biological evolution: exploring students’ talk and writing as an arena for sense-making. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Gothenburg).
- Olander, C., Wickman, P.-O., Tytler, R., & Ingerman, Å. (2018). Representations as mediation between purposes as junior secondary science students learn about the human body. International Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 204–226. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1407464
- Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2014).
Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning . In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 27–42). New York: Cambridge University. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.004 - Prain, V. (2004).
The role of language in science learning and literacy. i C. S . In, B. Hand Wallace & V. Prain (Eds.), Writing and learning in the science classroom (s. 33–45). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2018-6_4 - Rowlands, M. (2004). What do children think happens to the food they eat? Journal of Biological Education, 38(4), 167–171. DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2004.9655936
- Rundgren, C.-J., & Tibell, L. (2010). Critical Features of Visualizations of Transport through the Cell Membrane – An Empirical Study of Upper Secondary and Tertiary Students’ Meaning-Making of a Still Image and an Animation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(2), 223–246. DOI: 10.1007/s10763-009-9171-1
- Sabelli, N. H. (2006). Complexity, Tehnology Science and Education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1) 5–9. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1501_3
- Schönborn, K. J., & Anderson, T. R. (2006). The importance of visual literacy in the education of biochemists. Biochemistry and molecular biology education, 34(2), 94–102. DOI: 10.1002/bmb.2006.49403402094
- Selander, S., & Kress, G. (2010). Design för lärande – ett multimodalt perspektiv. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.
- Snapir, Z., Eberbach, C., Ben-Zvi-Assaraf, O., Hmelo-Silver, C., & Tripto, J. (2017). Characterising the development of the understanding of human body systems in high-school biology students– a longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2092–2127. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1364445
- Swedish National Agency of Education. (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare 2011. Retrieved from
https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3984 - Talanquer, V. (2009). On cognitive constraints and learning progressions: The case of “structure of matter”. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2123–2136. DOI: 10.1080/09500690802578025
- Tang, K. S., Delgado, C., & Moje, E. B. (2014). An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science education, 98(2), 305–326. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21099
- Teixeira, F. M. (2000). What happens to the food we eat? Children’s conceptions of the structure and function of the digestive system. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 507–520. DOI: 10.1080/095006900289750
- Tibell, L., & Rundgren, C.-J. (2010). Educational Challenges of Molecular Life Science- Characteristics and implications for education and research. CBE: Life Sciences Education, 9(1) 25–33. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.08-09-0055
- Tsui, C.-Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2013).
Introduction to multiple representations: Their importance in biology and biological education . In D. F. Treagust & C.-Y. Tsui (Eds.), Multiple representations in biological education (pp. 3–18). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8_1 - Tversky, B., Morrison, J.-B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 57, 247–262. DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017
- van Mil, M. H. W., Postma, P. A., Boerwinkel, D. J., Klaassen, K., & Waarlo, A. J. (2016). Molecular mechanistic reasoning: Toward bridging the gap between the molecular and cellular levels in life science education. Science Education, 100(3), 517–585. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21215
- Verhoeff, R. P., Knippels, M. C. P., Gilissen, M. G., & Boersma, K. T. (2018).
The theoretical nature of systems thinking. Perspectives on systems thinking in biology education . I Frontiers in Education (Vol. 3, s. 40). Frontiers. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00040 - Vetenskapsrådet. (2017). God forskningssed. (Reviderad utgåva). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
- Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students’ use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 5821–5842. DOI: 10.1002/tea.1033
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.175 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 45
Submitted on: May 21, 2021
Accepted on: Jan 19, 2022
Published on: Mar 8, 2022
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2022 Alma Jahic Pettersson, Carl-Johan Rundgren, Lena A.E. Tibell, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.