Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Adaptive Professional Development during the Pandemic Cover

Adaptive Professional Development during the Pandemic

By:   
Open Access
|Jan 2022

References

  1. Akyol, Z., Randy Garrison, D., & Yasar Ozden, M. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 6583. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.765
  2. Aldred, R. (2011). From community participation to organisational therapy? World Cafe and Appreciative Inquiry as research methods. Community Development Journal, 46(1), 5771. DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsp039
  3. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 1625. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X11428813
  4. Andriessen, J., & Baker, M. (2016). Arguing to Learn. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learning Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 439460). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.027
  5. Babadjanova, N. (2020). Effective classroom management techniques for curriculum of 21st century. Science and Education, 1(7).
  6. Beam, C. R., & Kim, A. J. (2020). Psychological Sequelae of Social Isolation and Loneliness Might Be a Larger Problem in Young Adults Than Older Adults. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(1), 5860. DOI: 10.1037/tra0000774
  7. Becuwe, H., Roblin, N. P., Tondeur, J., Thys, J., Castelein, E., & Voogt, J. (2017). Conditions for the successful implementation of teacher educator design teams for ICT integration: A Delphi study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 159172. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.2789
  8. Bell, P., Hoadley, C., & Linn, M. (2004). Design-based research in education. Internet Environments for Science Education, 7385.
  9. Bergdahl, N., & Bond, M. (2021). Negotiating K-12 (Dis-)engagement in Blended Learning. Education and Information Technologies. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10714-w
  10. Bergdahl, N., & Nouri, J. (2020). Covid-19 och omställning till distansundervisning i svensk skola [COVID-19 and the shift to crisis-prompted distance education in Swedish Schools]. https://www.ifous.se/app/uploads/2020/03/COVID19-omstllningen-till-distansundervisning.pdf
  11. Bjögvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.-A. (2012). Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. Design Issues, 28(3), 101116. DOI: 10.1162/DESI_a_00165
  12. Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 118. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
  13. Bond, M., Bergdahl, N., Mendizabal-Espinosa, R., Kneale, D., Bolan, F., Hull, P., & Ramadani, F. (2021). Global emergency remote education in secondary schools during COVID-19: A systematic review (pp. 177). EPPI Centre; UCL Social Research Institute; University College London.
  14. Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2012). Improving online social presence through asynchronous video. Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 195203. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.001
  15. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic Analysis. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Volume 2 (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 5771). American Psychology Association. DOI: 10.1037/13620-004
  16. Bubaš, G., & Kermek, D. (2004). The Prospects for Blended Learning in Croatian Academic Institutions. CARNet Users Conference. http://webct.carnet.hr:8900/webct/public/show_courses.pl
  17. Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DIGCOMPEDU). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356369. DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12345
  18. Cain, W., Bell, J., & Cheng, C. (2016). Implementing robotic telepresence in a synchronous hybrid course. Proceedings – IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2016, 171175. DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2016.79
  19. Clausen, J. M., Bunte, B., & Robertson, E. T. (2020). Professional Development to Improve Communication and Reduce the Homework Gap. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 443451.
  20. Crook, C., & Sutherland, R. (2017). Technology Enhanced Learning. 1127. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02600-8
  21. Department of upper secondary and adult education. (2020). Upper secondary school student experiences of crises-prompted distance education. Department of upper secondary and adult education, City of Malmoe.
  22. Dimitoglou, G. (2019). Telepresence: evaluation of robot stand-ins for remote student learning. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 35(3), 97111.
  23. Ekayati, R., & Rahayu, Y. S. (2019). Building Up Students’ Motivation In Learning English Through Fun English Learning Strategy. In Multi-Disciplinary International Conference University of Asahan (Vol. 0, Issue 1). http://jurnal.una.ac.id/index.php/seminter2019/article/view/583
  24. European Commission. (2013). Supporting Teacher Competence Development for Better Learning Outcomes.
  25. Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2020). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. Https://Doi-Org.Ezp.Sub.Su.Se/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
  26. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
  27. Getenet, S. (2019). Educational Research Using design-based research to bring partnership between researchers and practitioners Using design-based research to bring partnership between researchers and practitioners. DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2019.1677168
  28. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In B. Miller (Ed.), The handbook of blended learning: Vol. LVII (1st ed., Issue 1, pp. 321). Pfeiffer.
  29. Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 414. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
  30. Greener, S. (2021). Exploring remote distance learning: what is it and should we keep it? 29(1), 12. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1848506
  31. Grönlund, Å. (2020). Skolans fjärrundervisning under Coronapandemin 2020 [Remote education during the Corona pandemic 2020]. Örebro universitet, Handelshögskolan.
  32. Gudmundsdóttir, G. B., Dalaaker, D., Egeberg, G., Hatlevik, O. E., & Tømte, K. H. (2014). Interactive technology. Traditional practice? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 2014(1), 2343. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-01-05
  33. Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: when teaching together means learning for all. Corwin impact leadership series.
  34. Heradio, R., De La Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers and Education, 98, 1438. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010
  35. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-
  36. Holmström, O. (2021). Gymnasieskola på distans och grundskola i standby. [Emergency remote teaching in upper secondary schools and primary schools on stand by]. Malmö university. DOI: 10.24834/isbn.9789178771660
  37. Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 3745. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016
  38. Järvelä, S., & Renninger, A. K. (2014). Designing for learning: Interest, motivation, and engagement. In R. K. Sawyer, (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 64686685). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.040
  39. Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Malmberg, J. (2015). Understanding Regulated Learning in Situative and Contextual Frameworks. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 204219. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2015.1075400
  40. Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638654. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12107
  41. Kaden, U. (2020). COVID-19 School Closure-Related Changes to the Professional Life of a K–12 Teacher. Education Sciences, 10(6), 165. DOI: 10.3390/educsci10060165
  42. Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Do we need teachers as designers of technology-enhanced learning? Instructional Science, 43(2), 309322. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-015-9346-9
  43. König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608622. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
  44. Körkkö, M., Kotilainen, M. R., Toljamo, S., & Turunen, T. (2020). Developing teacher in-service education through a professional development plan: modelling the process. European Journal of Teacher Education, 118. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1827393
  45. Liao, H. L., & Lu, H. P. (2008). The role of experience and innovation characteristics in the adoption and continued use of e-learning websites. Computers and Education, 51(4), 14051416. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.006
  46. Lidolf, S., & Pasco, D. (2020). Educational Technology Professional Development in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 5). DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2020.00035
  47. Lockee, B. B. (2020). Shifting digital, shifting context: (re)considering teacher professional development for online and blended learning in the COVID-19 era. Educational Technology Research and Development 2020 69:1, 69(1), 1720. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-020-09836-8
  48. Mantra, I. B. N., Suwandi, I. N., Sukanadi, N. L., Astuti, N. K. W., & Indrawati, I. G. A. P. T. (2019). Teachers’ Competences in Dealing with Instructional Constraints to Develop Higher Quality of Learning. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 4448. DOI: 10.31295/ijss.v3n1.95
  49. Mun Ling, L., & Marton, F. (2011). Towards a science of the art of teaching. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(1), 722. DOI: 10.1108/20468251211179678
  50. Nguyen, Q., Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Bas, G. (2016). What learning analytics-based prediction models tell us about feedback preferences of students. Q. Rev. Distance Educ., 17(3), 1333.
  51. Nortvig, A. M., Petersen, A. K., & Balle, S. H. (2018). A Literature Review of the Factors Influencing E-Learning and Blended Learning in Relation to Learning Outcome, Student Satisfaction and Engagement. 16(1), 4655. www.ejel.org.
  52. Öckert, B. (2021). Barn och unga under coronapandemin [Children and adolescents during the Corona pandemic]. https://www.ifau.se/globalassets/pdf/se/2021/r-2021-02-barn-och-unga-under-coronapandemin.pdf
  53. Petrie, K., & McGee, C. (2012). Teacher professional development: Who is the learner? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 5872. DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2012v37n2.7
  54. Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified. In Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269290. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
  55. Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402417. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001
  56. Schildkamp, K., Wopereis, I., Kat-De Jong, M., Peet, A., & Hoetjes, I. (2020). Building blocks of instructor professional development for innovative ICT use during a pandemic. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3–4), 281293. DOI: 10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0034
  57. Schultze, U., & Brooks, J. A. M. (2019). An interactional view of social presence: Making the virtual other “real.” Information Systems Journal, 29(3), 707737. DOI: 10.1111/isj.12230
  58. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.
  59. Sveriges Elevkårer; Swedish Students Council. (2020). Gymnasieelevers upplevelse av distansundervisning under coronakrisen. [Secondary school students experiences of emergency remote teaching during the Corona crises]. Swedish Students Council.
  60. The Design-based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 58. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X032001005
  61. Thorne, K. (2003). How to support blended learning. In Blended Learning : How to Integrate Online & Traditional Learning. Kogan Page Publishers.
  62. Tomas, L., Lasen, M., Field, E., & Skamp, K. (2015). Promoting Online Students’ Engagement and Learning in Science and Sustainability Preservice Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(11), 40. DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2015v40n11.5
  63. Trikoilis, D., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2020). The Potential of Research for Professional Development in Isolated Settings. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 295300.
  64. van den Akker, J., Bannan, B., Kelly, A. E., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (2007). An Introduction to Educational Design Research (N. Nieveen & T. Plomp (eds.)). Netherland institute for curriculum development.
  65. van den Akker, J., Bannan, B., Kelly, A. E., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (2013). Educational Design Research, Part A: An Introduction, 206. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_11
  66. Wut, T. M., & Xu, J. (2021). Person-to-person interactions in online classroom settings under the impact of COVID-19: a social presence theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1, 3. DOI: 10.1007/s12564-021-09673-1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.172 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 13
Submitted on: Apr 13, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 17, 2021
Published on: Jan 25, 2022
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Nina Bergdahl, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.