Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Identifying Youths’ Spheres of Influence through Participatory Design Cover

Identifying Youths’ Spheres of Influence through Participatory Design

Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. Abrantes, J. L., Seabra, C., & Lages, L. F. (2007). Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance. Journal of Business Research, 60, 960964. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.026
  2. Alim, H. S., & Paris, D. (2017). What is Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy and why does it matter? In D. Paris & H. S. Alim (Eds.), Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies: Teaching and Learning for Justice in a Changing World (pp. 124). Teachers College Press.
  3. Archer, A. (2014). Multimodal designs for learning in contexts of diversity. Designs for Learning, 7(2), 828. DOI: 10.2478/dfl-2014-0061
  4. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & Wong, B. (2014). Spheres of influence: What shapes young people’s aspirations at age 12/13 and what are the implications for education policy? Journal of Education Policy, 29(1), 5885. DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2013.790079
  5. Bjerknes, G., & Bratteteig, T. (1995). User participation and democracy: A discussion of Scandinavian research on system development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 7(1), 7398.
  6. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.-A. (2010). Participatory design and “democratizing innovation.” Proceedings of the 11th Participatory Design Conference – PDC’10, 4150. DOI: 10.1145/1900441.1900448
  7. Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjögren, D., & Sundblad, Y. (2000). Cooperative design – Perspectives on 20 years with “the Scandinavian IT design model.” Proceedings of NordiCHI 2000, 19.
  8. Buechley, L., & Hill, B. M. (2010). LilyPad in the wild: How hardware’s long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. DIS 2010 – Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 199207. DOI: 10.1145/1858171.1858206
  9. Cabrero, D. G., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., & Abdelnour-Nocera, J. (2016). A critique of personas as representations of “the other” in cross-cultural technology design. Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction., 149154. DOI: 10.1145/2998581.2998595
  10. Coenraad, M., Palmer, J., Eatinger, D., Weintrop, D., & Franklin, D. (2021). Using Participatory Design to Integrate Stakeholder Voices in the Creation of a Culturally Relevant Computing Curriculum. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  11. Coenraad, M., Palmer, J., Franklin, D., & Weintrop, D. (2019). Enacting identities: Participatory design as a context for youth to reflect, project, and apply their emerging identities. Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children 2019(IDC ’19), 185196. DOI: 10.1145/3311927.3323148
  12. Coenraad, M., Weintrop, D., Eatinger, D., Palmer, J., & Franklin, D. (2020). Identifying spheres of influence for a culturally relevant computing curriculum through participatory design. In M. Gresalfi & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, Volume 2 (pp. 815816). International Society of the Learning Sciences. DOI: 10.22318/icls2020.815
  13. Druin, A. (1999). Cooperative Inquiry: Developing New Technologies for Children with Children. CHI ’99 Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, 592599. http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil. DOI: 10.1145/302979.303166
  14. Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behavior & Information Technology, 21(1), 125. DOI: 10.1080/01449290110108659
  15. Eglash, R., Bennett, A., O’Donnell, C., Jennings, S., & Cintorino, M. (2006). Culturally Situated Design Tools: Ethnocomputing from field site to classroom. American Anthropologist, 108(2), 347362. DOI: 10.1525/aa.2006.108.2.347
  16. Eglash, R., Gilbert, J. E., & Foster, E. (2013). Toward culturally responsive computing education. Communications of the ACM, 56(7), 33. DOI: 10.1145/2483852.2483864
  17. Fails, J. A., Guha, M. L., & Druin, A. (2012). Methods and Techniques for Involving Children in the Design of New Technology for Children. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction, 6(2), 85166. DOI: 10.1561/1100000018
  18. Franklin, D., Weintrop, D., Palmer, J., Coenraad, M., Cobian, M., Beck, K., Rasmussen, A., Krause, S., White, M., Ayana, M., & Crenshaw, Z. (2020). Scratch Encore: The design and pilot of a culturally-relevant intermediate Scratch curriculum. Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’20). DOI: 10.1145/3328778.3366912
  19. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
  20. Goode, J., & Margolis, J. (2011). Exploring Computer Science. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11(2), 116. DOI: 10.1145/1993069.1993076
  21. Guha, M. L., Druin, A., & Fails, J. A. (2013). Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 1, 1423. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.003
  22. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Johnson, P. (2017). Understanding identity sampling and cultural repertoires: Advancing a historicizing and syncretic system of teaching and learning in justice pedagogies. In D. Paris & H. S. Alim (Eds.), Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies: Teaching and Learning for Justice in a Changing World (pp. 247260). Teachers College Press.
  23. Holm Sørensen, B., & Tweddell Levinsen, K. (2014). Digital production and students as learning designers. Designs for Learning, 7(1), 5475. DOI: 10.2478/dfl-2014-0011
  24. Iversen, O. S., Kanstrup, A. M., & Petersen, M. G. (2004). A visit to the “New Utopia.” Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 171179. DOI: 10.1145/1028014.1028040
  25. Jimenez, Y., & Gardner-McCune, C. (2015). Using App Inventor & history as a gateway to engage African American students in computer science. Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology, RESPECT 2015. DOI: 10.1109/RESPECT.2015.7296512
  26. Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., Lui, D. A., Walker, J. T., Shaw, M. S., Jayathirtha, G., Nakajima, T. M., Goode, J., & Giang, M. T. (2019). Stitching the loop with electronic textiles promoting equity in high school students’ competencies and perceptions of computer science. Proceedings of 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘19), 11761182. DOI: 10.1145/3287324.3287426
  27. Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., & Searle, K. A. (2014). Electronic textiles as disruptive designs: Supporting and challenging maker activities in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 532557. DOI: 10.17763/haer.84.4.46m7372370214783
  28. Kafai, Y. B., Lee, E., Searle, K., Fields, D., Kaplan, E., & Lui, D. (2014). A Crafts-Oriented Approach to Computing in High School. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 120. DOI: 10.1145/2576874
  29. Kensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7, 167185. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008689307411
  30. King, L. G. J., Gardner-McCune, C., Vargas, P., & Jimenez, Y. (2014). Re-discovering and re-creating African American historical accounts through mobile apps: The role of mobile technology in history education. Journal of Social Studies Research, 38, 173188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jssr.2013.12.005
  31. Kong, S. C., Chiu, M. M., & Lai, M. (2018). A study of primary school students’ interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education. Computers and Education, 127, 178189. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.026
  32. Lachney, M. (2017). Computational communities: African-American cultural capital in computer science education. Computer Science Education, 27(3–4), 175196. DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2018.1429062
  33. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465491. DOI: 10.3102/00028312032003465
  34. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159174. DOI: 10.2307/2529310
  35. Lui, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2014). Immersive simulations for smart classrooms: Exploring evolutionary concepts in secondary science. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(1), 5780. DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2013.838452
  36. Magerko, B., Freeman, J., McKlin, T., Reilly, M., Livingston, E., McCoid, S., & Crews-Brown, A. (2016). EarSketch: A STEAM-based approach for underrepresented populations in high school computer science education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 16(4), 14:114:25. DOI: 10.1145/2886418
  37. Maloney, J., Resnick, M., & Rusk, N. (2010). The Scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4), 115. DOI: 10.1145/1868358.1868363
  38. Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Holme, J. J., & Nao, K. (2008). Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. MIT Press.
  39. Mejias, M., Jean-Pierre, K., Anderson, K., Washington, G., Burge, L., & Washington, A. N. (2018). The partnership for early engagement in computer science (PEECS) program: Facilitating the diversification of D.C.’s tech workforce. Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS), 141145.
  40. Miaskiewicz, T., & Kozar, K. A. (2011). Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes? Design Studies, 32(5), 417430. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003
  41. Muller, M. M. J., & Kuhn, S. (1993). Participatory design. Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 2428. DOI: 10.1145/153571.255960
  42. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy: A Needed Change in Stance, Terminology, and Practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 9397. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X12441244
  43. Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007). Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 5174. DOI: 10.1142/S1793206807000300
  44. Pereira, C., & Tikhonenko, S. (2017). Informatics education in Europe: Institutions, degrees, students, positions, salaries. https://www.informatics-europe.org/news/454-report-informatics-education-europe-key-data-2012-2017.html
  45. Pini, M., Musanti, S. I., & Cerratto Pargman, T. (2014). Youth digital cultural consumption and education. Designs for Learning, 7(2), 5879. DOI: 10.2478/dfl-2014-0063
  46. Proctor, C., & Blikstein, P. (2019). Unfold studio: Supporting critical literacies of text and code. Information and Learning Science, 120(5–6), 285307. DOI: 10.1108/ILS-05-2018-0039
  47. Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. B. (2009). Scratch: Programming for All. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 6067. DOI: 10.1145/1592761.1592779
  48. Roschelle, J., & Penuel, W. R. (2006). Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics. … of the 7Th International Conference on …, 606612. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1150122
  49. Ryoo, J. J., Margolis, J., Lee, C. H., Sandoval, C. D. M., & Goode, J. (2013). Democratizing computer science knowledge: Transforming the face of computer science through public high school education. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(2), 161181. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2013.756514
  50. Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd Editio). Sage.
  51. Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 518. DOI: 10.1080/15710880701875068
  52. Scott, K. A., Sheridan, K. M., & Clark, K. (2015). Culturally responsive computing: a theory revisited. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(4), 412436. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2014.924966
  53. Searle, K. A., Tofel-Grehl, C., & Breitenstein, J. (2019). Equitable engagement in STEM: Using e-textiles to challenge the positioning of non-dominant girls in school science. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 21(1), 4261. DOI: 10.18251/ijme.v21i1.1778
  54. Tedre, M., Sutinen, E., Kähkönen, E., & Kommers, P. (2006). Ethnocomputing: ICT in cultural and social context. Communications of the ACM, 49(1), 126130. DOI: 10.1145/1107458.1107466
  55. Tissenbaum, M., Sheldon, J., Seop, L., Lee, C. H., & Lao, N. (2017). Critical computational empowerment: Engaging youth as shapers of the digital future. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 17051708. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7943078
  56. Vakil, S. (2014). A critical pedagogy approach for engaging urban youth in mobile app development in an after-school program. Equity and Excellence in Education, 47(1), 3145. DOI: 10.1080/10665684.2014.866869
  57. Wang, J., & Moghadam, S. H. (2017). Diversity Barriers in K–12 Computer Science Education: Structural and Social. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 615620. DOI: 10.1145/3017680.3017734
  58. Washington, A. N., & Burge, L. (2013). Increasing and improving K-12 computer science education through partnerships. Proceedings of 2013 Hawaii University International Conferences.
  59. Washington, A. N., Burge, L., Mejias, M., & Jean-Pierre, K. (2012). The Partnership for Early Engagement in Computer Science (PEECS) program: Teaching African-American middle-school students computer science. International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS).
  60. Zhang, B., Looi, C. K., Seow, P., Chia, G., Wong, L. H., Chen, W., So, H. J., Soloway, E., & Norris, C. (2010). Deconstructing and reconstructing: Transforming primary science learning via a mobilized curriculum. Computers and Education, 55, 15041523. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.016
  61. Zweben, S., & Bizot, B. (2018). 2017 CRA Taulbee Survey: Another year of record undergrad enrollment; Doctoral degree production steady while master’s production rises again. Computing Research Association News, 30(5), 147. https://cra.org/crn/2018/05/2017-cra-taulbee-survey-another-year-of-record-undergrad-enrollment-doctoral-degree-production-steady-while-masters-production-rises-again/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.163 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 20 - 34
Submitted on: Aug 13, 2020
Accepted on: May 28, 2021
Published on: Jun 17, 2021
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Merijke Coenraad, David Weintrop, Donna Eatinger, Jen Palmer, Diana Franklin, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.