Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of Information and Communication Technology Competencies in Design-Based Learning Environments Cover

Assessment of Information and Communication Technology Competencies in Design-Based Learning Environments

Open Access
|Nov 2021

References

  1. Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. WIREs Computational Statistics, 2(4), 433459. DOI: 10.1002/wics.101
  2. Amir, Z., Ismail, K., & Hussin, S. (2011). Blogs in Language Learning: Maximizing Students’ Collaborative Writing. Kongres Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran UKM, 2010, 18, 537543. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.079
  3. Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: The heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454465. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-008-9114-6
  4. Arroyo, A. G. C., Matías, F. M. C., & Escobar, O. D. O. (2020). Collaborative Work Mediated by the Use of Google Drive as a Teaching Strategy Learning in Subjects of Research in Students of the Health Area. The FASEB Journal, 34(S1), 11. DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.03831
  5. Bakla, A. (2020). A mixed-methods study of feedback modes in EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 107128.
  6. Basri, M., & Patak, A. A. (2015). Exploring Indonesian students’ perception on Mendeley Reference Management Software in academic writing. 2015 2nd International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE), 813. DOI: 10.1109/ICITACEE.2015.7437761
  7. Besser, E. D., Blackwell, L. E., & Saenz, M. (2021). Engaging Students Through Educational Podcasting: Three Stories of Implementation. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 116. DOI: 10.1007/s10758-021-09503-8
  8. Borgman, C. L., Gilliland-Swetland, A. J., Leazer, G. H., Mayer, R., Gwynn, D., Gazan, R., & Mautone, P. (2000). Evaluating Digital Libraries for Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Education: A Case Study of the Alexandria Digital Earth ProtoType (ADEPT). Library Trends, 49(2), 228.
  9. Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp Goes to School: Mobile Instant Messaging between Teachers and Students. Journal of Information Technology Education, 13, 217231. a9h. DOI: 10.28945/2051
  10. Bozanta, A., & Mardikyan, S. (2017). The Effects Of Socıal Medıa Use On Collaboratıve Learnıng: A Case Of Turkey. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 96110. edsdoj. DOI: 10.17718/tojde.285719
  11. Brondfield, S., Seol, A., Hyland, K., Teherani, A., & Hsu, G. (2019). Integrating Concept Maps into a Medical Student Oncology Curriculum. Journal of Cancer Education, 17. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01601-7
  12. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 3242. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X018001032
  13. Çalık, A., Ulugergerli, E. U., Yaşar, C., & Taşpınar, K. (2016). Virtual Learning and Contribution from E-museum an Example for Earth Sciences. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo Conference SGEM 2016, Conference Proceedings, Book5, 3, 10771084.
  14. Cañas, A. J., Coffey, J. W., Carnot, M.-J., Feltovich, P., Hoffman, R. R., Feltovich, J., & Novak, J. D. (2003). A summary of literature pertaining to the use of concept mapping techniques and technologies for education and performance support. Report to the Chief of Naval Education and Training, Pensacola, Florida, IHMC.
  15. Cassany, D., Villanueva, C. A., & Ferrer, M. S. (2019). Whatsapp alrededor del aula. Caracteres: Estudios Culturales y Críticos de La Esfera Digital, 8(2), 302328.
  16. Chandrasekaran, S., Stojcevski, A., Littlefair, G., & Joordens, M. (2013). Project-oriented design-based learning: Aligning students’ views with industry needs. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(5), 11091118.
  17. Chen, Y., & He, W. (2013). Security risks and protection in online learning: A survey. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 14(5). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1632
  18. Chung, E. S., & Ahn, S. (2021). The effect of using machine translation on linguistic features in L2 writing across proficiency levels and text genres. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 126. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1871029
  19. Clifton, A., & Mann, C. (2011). Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning? Nurse Education Today, 31(4), 311313. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.004
  20. Cothran, T. (2011). Google Scholar acceptance and use among graduate students: A quantitative study. Library & Information Science Research, 33(4), 293301. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2011.02.001
  21. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1956). Construct validity in psychological tests. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1, 174204.
  22. Davis, M. (1998). Making a case for design-based learning. Arts Education Policy Review, 100(2), 715. DOI: 10.1080/10632919809599450
  23. Dershowitz, N., & Treinen, R. (1998). An on-line problem database. International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications, 332342. DOI: 10.1007/BFb0052380
  24. Dickey, M. D. (2003). Teaching in 3D: Pedagogical Affordances and Constraints of 3D Virtual Worlds for Synchronous Distance Learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 105121. DOI: 10.1080/01587910303047
  25. Doppelt, Y. (2009). Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), 5565. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-006-9008-y
  26. Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Identifying students’ perceptions of the important classroom features affecting learning aspects of a design-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 11(3), 195209. DOI: 10.1007/s10984-008-9047-2
  27. Duffy, P. D., & Bruns, A. (2006). The Use of Blogs, Wikis and RSS in Education: A Conversation of Possibilities. Online Learning and Teaching Conference 2006, 3138. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/5398/
  28. Duffy, T., & Cunningham, D. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 170198). Simon and Schuster.
  29. ECDL. (n.d.). ECL Computer Skills Certification. European Computer Driving Licence Foundation. http://ecdl.org/ecdl-education
  30. El Mhouti, A., Erradi, A. N. M., & Vasquèz, J. M. (2016). Cloud-based VCLE: A virtual collaborative learning environment based on a cloud computing architecture. Systems of Collaboration (SysCo), International Conference On, 16. DOI: 10.1109/SYSCO.2016.7831340
  31. Ellefson, M. R., Brinker, R. A., Vernacchio, V. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Design-based learning for biology: Genetic engineering experience improves understanding of gene expression. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education: A Bimonthly Publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 36(4), 292298. DOI: 10.1002/bmb.20203
  32. Erdogdu, U. F., & Eskimen, A. D. (2020). Dünya Klasiklerini Blog Tasarımı Yoluyla Okuma Deneyimi -Bir Uygulama Çalışması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 44, 329354. DOI: 10.21497/sefad.845426
  33. Ersungur, Ş. M., Kiziltan, A., & Polat, Ö. (2007). Türkiye’de Bölgelerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişlik Siralamasi: Temel Bileşenler Analizi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(2), 5566.
  34. Europass. (2015). Digital competences—Self-assessment grid. European Union. https://europass.cedefop.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dc-en.pdf
  35. European Commission. (2013). DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC83167/lb-na-26035-enn.pdf
  36. Feyzi Behnagh, R., & Yasrebi, S. (2020). An examination of constructivist educational technologies: Key affordances and conditions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 19071919. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13036
  37. Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Design-based science and real-world problem-solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855879. DOI: 10.1080/09500690500038165
  38. Gardner, G. E. (2012). Using Biomimicry to Engage Students in a Design-Based Learning Activity. The American Biology Teacher, 74(13), 182184. DOI: 10.1525/abt.2012.74.3.10
  39. Giavrimis, P., Papanis, E., & Roumeliotou, M. (2009). Issues of sociology of education. Sideris.
  40. Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How Video Production Affects Student Engagement: An Empirical Study of MOOC Videos. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, 4150. DOI: 10.1145/2556325.2566239
  41. Gurer, M. D. (2020). Sense Of Communıty, Peer Feedback And Course Engagement As Predıctors Of Learnıng In Blog Envıronments. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 237250. DOI: 10.17718/tojde.803415
  42. Gurung, R. K., Alsadoon, A., Prasad, P. W. C., & Elchouemi, A. (2016). Impacts of Mobile Cloud Learning (MCL) on Blended Flexible Learning (BFL). 2016 International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT), 108114. DOI: 10.1109/DT.2016.7557158
  43. Habeeb, K. M., & Ebrahim, A. H. (2019). Impact of e-portfolios on teacher assessment and student performance on learning science concepts in kindergarten. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 16611679. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-018-9846-8
  44. Halpern, D., Piña, M., & Ortega-Gunckel, C. (2020). School performance: New multimedia resources versus traditional notes//El rendimiento escolar: Nuevos recursos multimedia frente a los apuntes tradicionales. Comunicar, 28(64), 3948. DOI: 10.3916/C64-2020-04
  45. Heerwegh, D. (2003). Explaining response latencies and changing answers using client-side paradata from a web survey. Social Science Computer Review, 21(3), 360373. DOI: 10.1177/0894439303253985
  46. Ioannou, A., Brown, S. W., & Artino, A. R. (2015). Wikis and forums for collaborative problem-based activity: A systematic comparison of learners’ interactions. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 3545. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.001
  47. Ishtaiwa, F. F., & Aburezeq, I. M. (2015). The impact of Google Docs on student collaboration: A UAE case study. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 7, 8596. DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.07.004
  48. ISTE. (2016). ISTE Standards Students 2016. https://www.iste.org/standards/standards/for-students-2016
  49. Jackson, J. E. (2005). Varimax Rotation. In P. Armitage & T. Colton (Eds.), In Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. DOI: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a13091
  50. Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., Mayrath, M., & Trivedi, A. (2009). Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life. Computers & Education, 53(1), 169182. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.010
  51. Jimoyiannis, A., & Tsiotakis, P. (2016). Self-directed learning in e-portfolios: Analysing students’ performance and learning presence. EAI Endorsed Transactions on E-Learning, 3(10), 19. edsdoj. DOI: 10.4108/eai.11-4-2016.151154
  52. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, 2, 215239.
  53. Kafai, Y. (1995). Making Game Artifacts To Facilitate Rich and Meaningful Learning. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, SanFrancisco.
  54. Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187200. DOI: 10.1007/BF02289233
  55. Kapoor, A., Tiwari, V., & Kapoor, A. (2019). Teaching undergraduates beyond the classroom: Use of WhatsApp. Indian Pediatrics, 56(11), 967969. DOI: 10.1007/s13312-019-1664-6
  56. Karaman, H., Burcu, A., & Aktan, D. Ç. (2017). Açımlayıcı faktör analizinde kullanılan faktör çıkartma yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(3), 11731193. DOI: 10.17152/gefad.309356
  57. Ke, F. (2014). An implementation of design-based learning through creating educational computer games: A case study on mathematics learning during design and computing. Computers & Education, 73, 2639. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.010
  58. Kim, M. K., & Kim, S. M. (2020). Dynamic learner engagement in a wiki-enhanced writing course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(3), 582606. DOI: 10.1007/s12528-019-09248-5
  59. Kim, P., Suh, E., & Song, D. (2015). Development of a design-based learning curriculum through design-based research for a technology-enabled science classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 575602. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-015-9376-7
  60. Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., Muller, K. E., & Nizam, A. (1988). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods (Vol. 601). Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
  61. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntambekar, S. (1998). Learning by design from theory to practice. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 98, 1622. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/projects/lbd/htmlpubs/lbdtheorytoprac.html
  62. Lam, R. (2020). E-Portfolios: What We Know, What We Don’t, and What We Need to Know. RELC Journal. DOI: 10.1177/0033688220974102
  63. Lazonder, A. W. (2001). Minimalist Instruction for Learning to Search the World Wide Web. Education and Information Technologies, 6(3), 161176. DOI: 10.1023/A:1012756223618
  64. Lee, H.-K., & Breitenberg, M. (2010). Education in the New Millennium: The Case for Design-Based Learning. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 5460. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01631.x
  65. Lee, S.-M., & Briggs, N. (2021). Effects of using machine translation to mediate the revision process of Korean university students’ academic writing. ReCALL, 33(1), 1833. DOI: 10.1017/S0958344020000191
  66. Levy, P. (1997). Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace. Cambrigde, Mass.: Perseus Books.
  67. Li, Y., Chen, K., Su, Y., & Yue, X. (2021). Do social regulation strategies predict learning engagement and learning outcomes? A study of English language learners in wiki-supported literature circles activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 127. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-020-09934-7
  68. Lin, Y.-T., Wen, M.-L., Jou, M., & Wu, D.-W. (2014). A cloud-based learning environment for developing student reflection abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 244252. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.014
  69. Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of Learning Management Systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 686694. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.008
  70. Luchoomun, D., McLuckie, J., & van Wesel, M. (2010). Collaborative e-Learning: E-Portfolios for Assessment, Teaching and Learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 8(1), 2130. eric.
  71. Marzano, A., & Miranda, S. (2021). The DynaMap Remediation Approach (DMRA) in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 162, 104079. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104079
  72. Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schuun, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 7185. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00955.x
  73. Mitchell, G., Scott, J., Carter, G., & Wilson, C. B. (2021). Evaluation of a delirium awareness podcast for undergraduate nursing students in Northern Ireland: A pre/post-test study. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 111. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-021-00543-0
  74. Moryl, R. (2013). T-shirts, moonshine, and autopsies: Using podcasts to engage undergraduate microeconomics students. International Review of Economics Education, 13, 6774. DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2013.02.001
  75. Mracek, D. (2019). The Google search engine: A blended-learning tool for student empowerment. 2019 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), 224229. DOI: 10.1109/ISET.2019.00054
  76. Muzdalifah, I., & Handayani, S. (2020). Improving English Speaking Competence by Using Google Translate in Campus Environment. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 469(1), 012039. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/469/1/012039
  77. Neill, S. (2008). Assessment of the NEOTHEMI virtual museum project – An on-line survey. Computers & Education, 50(1), 410420. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.08.001
  78. Nelson, D. (2004). Design based learning delivers required standards in all subjects, K–12. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 17, 2736.
  79. NETg. (n.d.). NETg. https://kb.iu.edu/d/aidy
  80. Ngaleka, A., & Uys, W. (2013). M-learning with whatsapp: A conversation analysis. International Conference on E-Learning, 282.
  81. Nilsen, L. L. (2011). Collaboration and learning in medical teams by using video conference. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(4), 507515. a9h. DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.577193
  82. Noel, L. (2015). Using Blogs to Create a Constructivist Learning Environment. International Conference on New Horizons in Education, INTE 2014, 25-27 June 2014, Paris, France, 174, 617621. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.591
  83. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19(1), 2952. DOI: 10.1007/BF00377984
  84. P21. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf
  85. Palla, I. A., & Sheikh, A. (2020). Impact of social media on the academic performance of college students in Kashmir. Information Discovery and Delivery. DOI: 10.1108/IDD-06-2020-0061
  86. Ruggieri, C. (2020). Students’ use and perception of textbooks and online resources in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020123. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020123
  87. Savelyeva, N., Kabanov, A., Uvarina, N., Alexey, S., Nevraeva, N., Bozhko, E., Kozhevnikov, M., & Lapchinskaia, I. (2021). Pedagogical features of the organization of competence-oriented work and interaction of students with the use of google-doc tools. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 5(1), 4953. DOI: 10.14744/alrj.2020.53824
  88. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2011). Design based learning in crafts education: Authentic problems and materialization of design thinking. Design Learning and Well-Being, 4, 314.
  89. Shana, Z. (2009). Learning with Technology: Using Discussion Forums to Augment a Traditional-Style Class. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 214228.
  90. Shin, H. S., & Jeong, A. (2021). Modeling the relationship between students’ prior knowledge, causal reasoning processes, and quality of causal maps. Computers & Education, 163, 104113. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104113
  91. Snyder, W. M., Wenger, E., & Briggs, X. (2003). Communities of Practice in Government: Leveraging Knowledge for Performance. Public Manager, 32(4), 17.
  92. So, S. (2016). Whatslearn: The use of whatsapp for teaching and learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2016(December Special Issue), 13591365. edselc. DOI: 10.1037/t58376-000
  93. Sokolik, M. E. (2011). A Route to Communication: Google Maps. TESL-EJ, 15(3), 1.
  94. Sue, V. M., & Ritter, L. A. (2011). Conducting online surveys. Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781506335186
  95. Tabachnick, G. B., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
  96. Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  97. Trocky, N. M., & Buckley, K. M. (2016). Evaluating the Impact of Wikis on Student Learning Outcomes: An Integrative Review. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(5), 364376. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.007
  98. van Rensburg, A., Snyman, C., & Lotz, S. (2012). Applying Google Translate in a higher education environment: Translation products assessed. Southern African Linguistics & Applied Language Studies, 30(4), 511524. a9h. DOI: 10.2989/16073614.2012.750824
  99. Warburton, S., García, M. P., & Russell, D. (2009). 3D design and collaboration in massively multi-user virtual environments (MUVEs). Cases on Collaboration in Virtual Learning Environments: Processes and Interactions, 2741. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-878-9.ch002
  100. Warschauer, M. (1995). E-Mail for English Teaching: Bringing the Internet and Computer Learning Networks into the Language Classroom. ERIC.
  101. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Press.
  102. Willis, J. (1995). A Recursive, Reflective Instructional Design Model Based on Constructivist-Interpretivist Theory. Educational Technology, 35(6), 523.
  103. Yan, T., & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Fast times and easy questions: The effects of age, experience and question complexity on web survey response times. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22(1), 5168. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1331
  104. Yücedağ, A. (1993). Anket Geliştirilmesi ve Uygulanması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(2).
  105. Zhang, X., Chen, H., de Pablos, P. O., Lytras, M. D., & Sun, Y. (2016). Coordinated Implicitly? An Empirical Study on the Role of Social Media in Collaborative Learning. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 17(6), 121144. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2622
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.160 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 55 - 70
Submitted on: Apr 28, 2020
Accepted on: May 6, 2021
Published on: Nov 25, 2021
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Hasan Çakır, Harun Bahadır, Aslıhan Tüfekci, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.