Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unpacking the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram: A Social Semiotic Analysis of the Disciplinary and Pedagogical Affordances of a Central Resource in Astronomy Cover

Unpacking the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram: A Social Semiotic Analysis of the Disciplinary and Pedagogical Affordances of a Central Resource in Astronomy

By:  and    
Open Access
|Aug 2019

References

  1. Airey, J. (2015). Social Semiotics in Higher Education: Examples from teaching and learning in undergraduate physics. Paper presented at the Concorde Hotel/National Institute of Education, Singapore, 3–5 November 2015.
  2. Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2009). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 2749. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20265
  3. Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2017). Social Semiotics in University Physics Education. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & H. E. Fischer (Eds.), Multiple Representations in Physics Education (pp. 95122). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_5
  4. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2 & 3), 105226. DOI: 10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
  5. Englund, T. (1998). Teaching as an offer of (discursive) meaning? In B. Gundem, & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum. An international dialogue (pp. 215223). New York: Peter Lang.
  6. Eriksson, U. (2007). Stellar surface structures and the astrometric search for exoplanets. (Licentiate degree), Lund University and Kristianstad University.
  7. Eriksson, U., Linder, C., Airey, J., & Redfors, A. (2014). Introducing the Anatomy of Disciplinary Discernment – An example for Astronomy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 167182.
  8. Fredlund, T., Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2012). Exploring the role of physics representations: an illustrative example from students sharing knowledge about refraction. European Journal of Physics, 33(3), 657. DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/33/3/657
  9. Fredlund, T., Linder, C., Airey, J., & Linder, A. (2014). Unpacking physics representations: Towards an appreciation of disciplinary affordance. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020129. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020129
  10. Hearnshaw, J. B. (1990). The analysis of starlight: one hundred and fifty years of astronomical spectroscopy. CUP Archive.
  11. Hertzsprung, E. (1911). Über die Verwendung photographischer effektiver Wellenlaengen zur Bestimmung von Farbenäquivalenten. Publikationen des Astrophysikalischen Observatoriums zu Potsdam, 63.
  12. Hoskin, M. (1999). The Cambridge Concise History of Astronomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Hughes, D. W. (2006). The Introduction of Absolute Magnitude (1902–1922). Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 9, 173179.
  14. Kapteyn, J. C. (1902). On the luminosity of fixed stars. Publications of the Astronomical Laboratory at Groningen, 11, 432.
  15. Middendorf, J., & Pace, D. (2004). Decoding the disciplines: A model for helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 98(Summer 2004), 112. DOI: 10.1002/tl.142
  16. Northedge, A. (2002). Learning for life in the 21st century. Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. In G. Wells, & G. Claxton (Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  17. Russell, H. N. (1912). Relations between the spectra and other characteristics of the stars. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 51(207), 569579.
  18. Russell, H. N. (1913). Relations between the spectra and other characteristics of the stars. Popular Astronomy, 22, 275294.
  19. Russell, H. N. (1914). Relations Between the Spectra and other Characteristics of the Stars. II. Brightness and Spectral Class. Nature, 93, 252258. DOI: 10.1038/093252a0
  20. Taber, K. S., & Mike Watts, M. (1996). The secret life of the chemical bond: students’ anthropomorphic and animistic references to bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 18(5), 557568. DOI: 10.1080/0950069960180505
  21. Tobias, S. (1986). Peer Perspectives – On the teaching of Science. Change, 18, 3641. DOI: 10.1080/00091383.1986.9937055
  22. Tobias, S. (1992–1993). Disciplinary cultures and general education: What can we learn from our learners? Teaching Excellence, 4(6), 13.
  23. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (Anscombe, G. E. M., Trans. 2 ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.137 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 99 - 107
Submitted on: Feb 27, 2019
Accepted on: May 13, 2019
Published on: Aug 16, 2019
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 John Airey, Urban Eriksson, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.