Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Relationship Between Teachers’ Perceived Classroom Management Abilities and Their Professional Digital Competence Cover

The Relationship Between Teachers’ Perceived Classroom Management Abilities and Their Professional Digital Competence

Open Access
|Jul 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Factor Loadings (Oblique Rotated) from the Principal Axis Factor Analysis (N = 2477).

QuestionsFactor 1Factor 2Communalities
‘How would you rate your basic skills when using digital tools in school?’.86.01.76
‘Based on the previous questions, how would you estimate your overall digital competence in relation to teaching?’.84.51.78
‘How would you rate your elementary skills when using digital tools in your leisure time?’.81-.02.72
‘How would you rate your skills within didactic ICT use?’.77.38.63
‘How would you estimate your competence to guide students’ digital judgement related to their digital lifestyle within and outside of school?’.66.56.58
‘How would you rate your skills in guiding students in the use of digital learning strategies?’.62.57.55
‘Based on the previous questions, how would you estimate the students’ overall digital competence within school subjects?’.27.75.57
‘To what extent do you believe the teachers at your school are good role models for the students’ curricular ICT use in education?’.13.74.56
Eigenvalue:3.91.3
Figure 1

Teachers’ self-reported data relating to the seven elements of classroom management (N = 2579).

Figure 2

Teachers’ self-reported data relating to the five elements of the digital competence model (N = 2579).

Table 2

Regression analysis results of teachers’ reported ability for classroom management (dependent variable) predicted by professional digital competence, teaching control, age, work experience, screen time and ICT qualifications (formal and in-service).

dfl-11-128-g4.png

Predictor VariablesClassroom management
BBeta
Digital competence0.43*0.34
Screen time0.08*0.10
Work experience–0.07*–0.07
Teaching control0.05*0.10
Age0.02  0.03
Formal ICT training0.01  0.01
In-service ICT training0.04  0.02
R² (adj.)0.175

[i] Note: * p < .001.

Table 3

Regression analysis results of student-teacher relations (dependent variable) predicted by digital competence, teaching control, age, work experience, screen time and ICT qualifications (formal and in-service).

dfl-11-128-g4.png

Predictor VariablesStudent-teacher relations
BBeta
Digital competence0.50*0.39
Teaching control0.15*0.31
Age0.10*0.16
Work experience–0.04  –0.04
Screen time–0.02  –0.03
Formal ICT training0.02  0.02
In-service ICT training0.09  0.03
R² (adj.)0.312

[i] Note: * p < .001.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.128 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 80 - 98
Submitted on: Nov 6, 2018
Accepted on: Feb 19, 2019
Published on: Jul 5, 2019
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Synnøve Moltudal, Rune Krumsvik, Lise Jones, Ole Johan Eikeland, Burke Johnson, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.