Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Multimodality in Language Education – Implications for Teaching Cover

Multimodality in Language Education – Implications for Teaching

Open Access
|Aug 2019

References

  1. Aagaard, T., & Silseth, K. (2017). Teachers’ assessment of digital stories: challenges and dilemmas. In Nordic Studies in Education, 37(03–04), 231242. DOI: 10.18261/issn.1891-5949-2017-03-04-08
  2. Adami, E. (2015). A social semiotic perspective on digital mobility. In Media Education. Studies and research, 6(2), 184207.
  3. Adoniou, M. (2013). Drawing to Support Writing Development in English Language Learners. In Language and Education, 27(3), 261277. DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2012.704047
  4. Alghadeer, H. A. (2014). Digital Landscapes: Rethinking Poetry Interpretation in Multimodal Texts. In Journal of Arts and Humanities, 3(2), 8796.
  5. Baldwin, K. M. (2016). Multimodal Assessment in Action: What We Really Value in New Media Texts. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
  6. Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: an introduction to the ecology of written language (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  7. Bazalgette, C., & Buckingham, D. (2013). Literacy, media and multimodality: a critical response. In Literacy, 47(2), 95102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741–;4369.2012.00666.x
  8. Bearne, E. (2009). Multimodality, literacy and texts: Developing a discourse. In Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(2), 156187. DOI: 10.1177/1468798409105585
  9. Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: a social semiotic frame. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315687537
  10. Björkvall, A. (2009). Den visuella texten: multimodal analys i praktiken. [The visual text: multimodal analysis in practice]. Stockholm: Hallgren & Fallgren.
  11. Borgfeldt, E. (2017). “Det kan vara svårt att förklara på rader”: perspektiv på analys och bedömning av multimodal textproduktion i årskurs 3. [“It’s hard to explain on a line”: perspectives and analysis of multimodal text production in year 3] Diss. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.
  12. Cederlund, C., & Sofkova Hashemi, S. (2018). Multimodala bedömningspraktiker och lärares lärande [Multimodal assessment practices and teachers’ learning]. In EduCare, 2018(1), 4368. DOI: 10.24834/educare.2018.1.3
  13. Chandler, P. D. (2017). To what extent are teachers well prepared to teach multimodal authoring? In Cogent Education, 4(1). DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1266820
  14. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: the beginning of an idea. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 38). London: Routledge.
  15. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2010). New media, new learning. In D. R. Cole & D. L. Pullen (Eds.), Multiliteracies in Motion (pp. 87104). Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
  16. Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., & Magee, L. (2011). Towards a semantic web: connecting knowledge in academic research (1. publ.) Oxford: Chandos. DOI: 10.1533/9781780631745
  17. Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2014). Se texten!: multimodala texter i ämnesdidaktiskt arbete (1. uppl.) [Perceive the text: multimodal texts in teaching]. Malmö: Gleerups.
  18. Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2016). Reading Multimodal Texts for learning – a model for Cultivating Multimodal Literacy. In Designs for Learning, 8(1), 2536. DOI: 10.16993/dfl.72
  19. Drotner, K., & Erstad, O. (2014). Inclusive Media Literacies: Interlacing Media Studies and Education Studies. In International Journal of Learning and Media, 4(2), 1934. DOI: 10.1162/IJLM_a_00092
  20. Dymoke, S., & Hughes, J. (2009). Using a poetry Wiki: How can the medium support pre-service teachers of English in their professional learning about teaching about poetry and teaching poetry writing in a digital age? In English teaching: Practice and Critique, 8, 91106.
  21. Early, M., & Marshall, S. (2008). Adolescent ESL Students’ Interpretation and Appreciation of Literary Texts: A Case Study of Multimodality. In The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(3), 377397. DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.64.3.377
  22. Elf, N., Gilje, Ø., Olin-Scheller, C., & Slotte, A. (2018). Nordisk status og forskningsperspektiver: Multimodalitet i styredokumenter og klasserumsrumspraksis [Nordic research perspectives: multimodality in curricula and classroom practices]. In M. Rogne & L. Rune Waage (Eds.), Multimodalitet i skole- og fritidstekstar. Ein vitskapleg antologi (pp. 71104). Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.
  23. Elmfeldt, J., & Erixon, P.-O. (2004). Genrer i rörelse – estetiska textpraktiker i gymnasieskolan. [Genres in motion – esthetical text practices in upper secondary school]. In S. Thorson (Ed.), Andra nationella konferensen i svenska med didaktisk inriktning (pp. 3746). Göteborg: Nationella nätverket för svenska med didaktisk inriktning.
  24. Flewitt, R., & Wolfe, S. (2010). New technologies, new multimodal literacy practices and young children’s metacognitive development. In Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(4): 387399. DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2010.526589
  25. Gilje, Ø. (2010). Multimodal Redesign in Filmmaking Practices: An Inquiry of Young Filmmakers’ Deployment of Semiotic Tools in Their Filmmaking Practice. In Written Communication, 27(4), 494522. DOI: 10.1177/0741088310377874
  26. Grapin, S. (2018). Multimodality in the New Content Standards Era: Implications for English Learners. In Tesol Quarterly, 53(1), 3055. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.443
  27. Godhe, A.-L. (2014). Creating and assessing multimodal texts: negotiations at the boundary. Diss. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.
  28. Godhe, A-L., & Magnusson, P. (2017). Multimodality in language education: exploring the boundaries of digital texts. In W. Chen, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computers in Education. New Zealand: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. Retrieved September, 2018 from http://hkr.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1163921/FULLTEXT02.pdf
  29. Godhe, A.-L., Magnusson, P., & Sofkova Hashemi, S. (submitted). Adequate Digital Competence – Exploring revisions in the Swedish national curriculum.
  30. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
  31. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social Semiotics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
  32. Höglund, H. (2017). Video Poetry: Negotiating Literary Interpretations. Students’ Multimodal Designing in Response to Literature. Diss. Åbo Akademi. Åbo Akademi University Press.
  33. Jewitt, C. (2005). Technology, literacy and learning: a multimodal approach. London: Routledge.
  34. Jewitt, C. (2007). A multimodal perspective on textuality and contexts. In Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 15(3), 275289. DOI: 10.1080/14681360701601937
  35. Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms. In Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241267. DOI: 10.3102/0091732X07310586
  36. Jewitt, C. (2014a). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 1530). London: Routledge.
  37. Jewitt, C. (2014b). Different approaches to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 3143). London: Routledge.
  38. Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Port Melbourne Vic: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139196581
  39. Kenner, C. (2004). Becoming biliterate: Young children learning different writing systems. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.
  40. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203164754
  41. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality, A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203970034
  42. Kress, G., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jewitt, C., Jones, K., & Reid, J. (2004). English in urban classrooms: a multimodal perspective on teaching and learning. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203397305
  43. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse, the modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
  44. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: the grammar of visual design (2nd ed.) London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203619728
  45. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  46. Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. In Visual Communication, 1(3), 299325. DOI: 10.1177/147035720200100303
  47. Lemke, J. (2006). Toward Critical Multimedia Literacy: Technology, Research and Politics. In M. C. McKenna (Ed.), International handbook of literacy and technology, 2, 314. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  48. Macken-Horarik, M. (2016). Building a metalanguage for interpreting multimodal literature: insights from systemic functional semiotics in two case study classrooms. In English in Australia, 51(2), 8599.
  49. Mackenzie, N., & Veresov, N. (2013). How drawing can support writing acquisition: Text construction in early writing from a Vygotskian perspective. In Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(4), 2329. DOI: 10.1177/183693911303800404
  50. NATE (National Association for the Teaching of English). (2009). Entitlement to ICT in Secondary English. Retrieved September, 2018 from www.nate.org.uk/cmsfiles/ict/Secondary_English-entitlement_document_2009.pdf
  51. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. In Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 6092. DOI: 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
  52. New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 937). London: Routledge.
  53. Newfield, D., & D’Abdon, R. (2015). Reconceptualising Poetry as a Multimodal genre. In Tesol Quarterly, 49(3), 510532. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.239
  54. Oldham, J. (2005). Literacy and media in Secondary Schools in the United Kingdom. In B. Street (Ed.), Literacies Across Educational Contexts: Mediating Learning and Teaching (pp. 170187). Philadelphia: Caslon.
  55. Olin-Scheller, C. (2006). Mellan Dante och Big Brother: en studie om gymnasieelevers textvärldar. [Between Dante and Big Brother: a study on the text worlds of upper secondary school students]. Diss. Karlstad: Karlstads universitet.
  56. Pahl, K. (2009). Interactions, intersections and improvisations: Studying the multimodal texts and classroom talk of six to seven year olds. In Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(2): 188210. DOI: 10.1177/1468798409105586
  57. Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (Eds.) (2006). Travel Notes from the New Literacy Studies: Instances of Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd. DOI: 10.21832/9781853598630
  58. Pantaleo, S. (2012). Meaning-making with colour in multimodal texts: an 11-year-old student’s purposeful ‘doing’. In Literacy, 46(3), 147155. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-4369.2012.00664.x
  59. Potts, D., & Moran, M. J. (2013). Mediating multilingual children’s language resources. In Language and Education, 27(5), 451468. DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2012.720688
  60. Rowsell, J., & Decoste, E. (2012). (Re)designing writing in English class: a multimodal approach to teaching writing. In Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(3), 246260. DOI: 10.1080/1554480X.2012.685226
  61. Säljö, R. (2010). Lärande i praktiken: ett sociokulturellt perspektiv. 2: a uppl. [Learning in practice. A socio cultural perspective 2nd ed]. Stockholm: Norstedts.
  62. Selander, S. (2017). Didaktiken efter Vygotskij: design för lärande. [Didactics after Vygotskij: designs for learning]. Stockholm: Liber.
  63. Selander, S., & Kress, G. (2010). Design för lärande: ett multimodalt perspektiv. [Designs for learning: a multimodal perspective]. Stockholm: Norstedt.
  64. Shipka, J. (2011). Toward a Composition Made Whole. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt5hjqkk
  65. Silseth, K., & Gilje, Ø. (2019). Multimodal composition and assessment: a sociocultural perspective. In Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(1), 2642. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2017.1297292
  66. Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education]. (2016). It-användning och it-kompetens i skolan [It use and it competency in schools]. Retrieved March 2016 from http://www.skolverket.se/om-skolverket/publikationer/visa-enskild-publikation?_xurl_=http%3A%2F%2Fwww5.skolverket.se%2Fwtpub%2Fws%2Fskolbok%2Fwpubext%2Ftrycksak%2FRecord%3Fk%3D3617
  67. Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education]. (2017a). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011: reviderad 2017. [Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre, 2011, revised 2017]. Stockholm: Skolverket. Retrieved July 2017 from https://www.skolverket.se/om-skolverket/publikationer/visa-enskild-publikation?_xurl_=http%3A%2F%2Fwww5.skolverket.se%2Fwtpub%2Fws%2Fskolbok%2Fwpubext%2Ftrycksak%2FBlob%2Fpdf3813.pdf%3Fk%3D3813
  68. Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education]. (2017b). Läroplan, examensmål och gymnasiegemensamma ämnen för gymnasieskola 2011, reviderad 2017. [Curriculum for upper secondary school 2011, revised 2017]. Stockholm: Skolverket. Retrieved July 2017 from: https://www.skolverket.se/polopoly_fs/1.266015!/Laroplan_gymnasieskolan.pdf
  69. Smith, B. E. (2014). Beyond words: A review of research on adolescents and multimodal composition. In R. E. Ferdig & K. E. Pytash (Eds.), Exploring multimodal composition and digital writing (pp. 119). IGI Global: Hershey. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4345-1.ch001
  70. Sofkova Hashemi, S. (2017). Socio-semiotic patterns in digital meaning-making: semiotic choices as indicator of communicative experience. In Language and Education, 31(5), 432448. DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2017.1305396
  71. Statens Medieråd [The Governmental Media Council]. (2017). Unga och medier 2015. [Young people and media 2015]. Stockholm: Statens Medieråd. Retrieved June 2018 from https://statensmedierad.se/download/18.7b0391dc15c38ffbccd9a238/1496243409783/Ungar%20och%20medier%202017.pdf
  72. Svärdemo Åberg, E., & Åkerfeldt, A. (2017). Design and recognition of multimodal texts: selection of digital tools and modes on the basis of social and material premises? In Journal of Computers in Education, 4(3), 283306. DOI: 10.1007/s40692-017-0088-3
  73. Tønnessen, E. S. (2010). Tekstpraksis i bevegelse [Text practises in motion]. In E. S. Tønnessen (Ed.), Sammensatte tekster. Barns tekstpraksis (pp. 1022). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  74. Tønnessen, E. S. (2011). Multimodal textkompetense og dataspill, [Multimodal text competence and computer games]. In M. Ellvin, G. Skar & M. Tengberg (Eds.), Svenskämnet i förändring […] (pp. 8299). Svensklärarserien 234.
  75. Unsworth, L. (2008). Explicating inter-modal meaning-making in media and literary texts: Towards a metalanguage of image/language relations. In A. Burn & C. Durrant (Eds.), Media Teaching: Language, Audience, Production (pp. 4880). Kent Town, South Australia: Wakefield Press and AATE-NATE.
  76. Unsworth, L., & Thomas, A. (Eds.) (2014). English Teaching and New Literacies Pedagogy. Interpreting and authoring digital media narratives. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. DOI: 10.3726/978-1-4539-1311-6
  77. Xerri, D. (2012). Poetry Teaching and Multimodality. Theory into practice. In Creative Education, 3(4), 507512. DOI: 10.4236/ce.2012.34077
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.127 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 127 - 137
Submitted on: Oct 24, 2018
Accepted on: Aug 12, 2019
Published on: Aug 27, 2019
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Petra Magnusson, Anna-Lena Godhe, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.