Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Potential for Meaning Making in Mathematics Textbooks Cover

Potential for Meaning Making in Mathematics Textbooks

By:   
Open Access
|Apr 2019

References

  1. Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2010). Changing Text: A Social Semiotic Analysis of Textbooks. Designs for learning, 3(1–2), 1029. DOI: 10.16993/dfl.26
  2. Björklund Boistrup, L. (2017). Multimodalitet och matematik. [Multimodality and mathematics]. In E. Insulander, S. Kjällander, F. Lindstrand, & A. Åkerfeldt (Eds.), Didaktik i omvandlingens tid: text, representation, design. [Didactics in a time of change – text, representation, design]. Stockholm: Liber.
  3. Brorsson, Å. (2014a). Prima matematik. 1A. [Fine mathematics. 1A]. (2nd ed.). Malmö: Gleerups Utbildning.
  4. Brorsson, Å. (2014b). Prima matematik. [Fine mathematics.]. Digital textbook. Malmö: Gleerups Utbildning.
  5. Carpenter, T. P., & Moser, J. M. (1983). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts. In R. Lesh, & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics: Concepts and processes (pp. 744). New York: Academic Press.
  6. Carter, J., Li, Y., & Ferrucci, B. J. (1997). A comparison of how textbooks present integer addition and subtraction in PRC and USA. The Mathematics Educator, 2(2), 197209.
  7. Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H.-Y., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical thinking and learning, 12(2), 117151. DOI: 10.1080/10986060903460070
  8. Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2014). Se texten!: multimodala texter i ämnesdidaktiskt arbete. [View the text! – Multimodal texts in education]. Malmö: Gleerups.
  9. Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2016). Reading multimodal texts for learning – A model for cultivating multimodal literacy. Designs for Learning, 8(1), 2536. DOI: 10.16993/dfl.72
  10. Despina, D., & Harikleia, L. (2014). Addition and subtraction word problems in Greek grade A and grade B mathematics textbooks: Distribution and children’s understanding. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, July 2014.
  11. Dowling, P. (1996). A sociological analysis of school mathematics texts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(4), 389415. DOI: 10.1007/BF00369156
  12. Dowling, P. (2013). Social Activity Method (SAM): A Fractal Language for Mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(3), 317340. DOI: 10.1007/s13394-013-0073-8
  13. Dyrvold, A. (2016). The role of semiotic resources when reading and solving mathematics tasks. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 5172.
  14. Engvall, M. (2013). Handlingar i matematikklassrummet: en studie av undervisningsverksamheter på lågstadiet då räknemetoder för addition och subtraktion är i fokus. [Actions in the math classroom– a study of early years education activities, when addition and subtraction counting methods are in focus.]. Diss. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.
  15. Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM: The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 45(5), 633646. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
  16. Foxman, D., & Beishuizen, M. (2002). Mental calculation methods used by 11-Year -olds in different attainment bands: A reanalysis of data from the 1987 APU survey in the UK. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1–2), 4169. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022416021640
  17. Fuson, K. C. (1992). Research on whole number addition and subtraction. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 243275). New York: Macmillan.
  18. Fuson, K. C., Stiegler, J. W., & Bartsch, K. (1988). Grade placement of addition and subtraction topics in Japan, mainland China, the Soviet Union, Taiwan and the United States. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(5), 449456. DOI: 10.2307/749177
  19. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the “voice” of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344369. DOI: 10.2307/30034878
  20. Jewitt, C. (2011). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 1427). London: Routledge.
  21. Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J. J., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  22. Johansson, M. (2006). Teaching mathematics with textbooks: a classroom and curricular perspective. Diss. Luleå: Luleå tekniska universitet.
  23. Kavén, A., & Persson, H. (2011). Mattedetektiverna. 1A. [Math detectives 1A]. Stockholm: Liber.
  24. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203299234
  25. Kress, G. (2011). What is mode? In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 5467). London: Routledge.
  26. Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
  27. Lepik, M., Grevholm, B., & Viholainen, A. (2015). Using textbooks in the mathematics classroom – the teachers’ view. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 20(3–4), 129156.
  28. Mayer, K. K., Sims, V., & Tajika, H. (1995). A comparison of how textbooks teach mathematical problem solving in Japan and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 443460. DOI: 10.2307/1163438
  29. Morgan, C. (2006). What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 219245. DOI: 10.1007/s10649-006-5477-x
  30. Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.
  31. Nugroho, A. D. (2010). Mathematics textbooks of primary 1 used in Singapore: A multimodal analysis of its intersemiosis. K@ta, 12(1), 7291. DOI: 10.9744/kata.12.1.72-91
  32. O’Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.
  33. O’Keeffe, L., & O’Donoghue, J. (2015). A role for language analysis in mathematics textbook analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(3), 605630. DOI: 10.1007/s10763-013-9463-3
  34. Österholm, M. (2006). Characterizing reading comprehension of mathematical texts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 325346. DOI: 10.1007/s10649-005-9016-y
  35. Österholm, M. (2008). Do students need to learn how to use their mathematics textbooks? The case of reading comprehension. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 13(3), 5373.
  36. Pansell, A. (2018). The ecology of Mary’s mathematics teaching: tracing co-determination within school mathematics practices. Diss. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.
  37. Reys, B., Reys, R., & Koyama, M. (1996). The development of computation in three Japanese primary-grade textbooks. The Elementary School Journal, 96(4), 423437. DOI: 10.1086/461837
  38. Riley, M. S., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children’s problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153196). New York: Academic Press.
  39. Segerby, C. (2017). Supporting mathematical reasoning through reading and writing in mathematics: making the implicit explicit. Diss. Malmö: Malmö högskola.
  40. Selander, S., & Kress, G. (2010). Design för lärande: ett multimodalt perspektiv. [Designs for learning – a multimodal perspective]. Stockholm: Norstedt.
  41. Skolverket. (2010). Ämnesproven i grundskolans årskurs 5 [National tests in Year 5]. Retrieved from: https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/27935/1/gupea_2077_27935_1.pdf.
  42. Sutherland, R., Winter, J., & Harries, T. (2001). A transnational comparison of primary mathematics textbooks: The case of multiplication. Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1), 155167. DOI: 10.1080/14794800008520090
  43. Taflin, E. (2007). Matematikproblem i skolan: för att skapa tillfällen till lärande. [Mathematics problems in school: to create opportunities for learning]. Diss. Umeå: Umeå universitet.
  44. Weinberg, A., & Wiesner, E. (2011). Understanding mathematics textbooks through reader-oriented theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 4963. DOI: 10.1007/s10649-010-9264-3
  45. Zhou, Z., & Peverly, S. T. (2005). Teaching addition and subtraction to first graders: A Chinese perspective. Psychology in the schools, 42(3), 259272. DOI: 10.1002/pits.20077
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.123 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 52 - 62
Submitted on: Sep 28, 2018
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2019
Published on: Apr 24, 2019
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Malin Norberg, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.