Challenges in Designing Personalised Learning Paths in SPOCs
References
- Akbulut, Y., & Cardak, C. S. (2012). Adaptive educational hypermedia accommodating learning styles: a content analysis of publications from 2000 to 2011. Computers & Education, 58(2), 835–842. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.008
- Amiel, T., & Reeves, T. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 29–40.
- Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: a decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X11428813
- Clark, D. (2013). MOOCs: taxonomy of 8 types of MOOCs. Retrieved January 31, 2018, from
http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.dk/2013/04/moocs-taxonomy-of-8-types-of-mooc.html - Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 39(15), 1–17. Retrieved December 2, 2018, from
http://www.um.es/ead/red/39/conole.pdf - Conole, G. (2014). A new classification schema for MOOCs. The International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 2(3), 65–77. Retrieved December 2, 2018, from
http://innoqual.efquel.org/current-issue/ - Fox, A. (2013). From MOOCs to SPOCs. Communications of the ACM. 56(12), 38–41. DOI: 10.1145/2535918
- Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: the role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39, 93–104. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.93
- Gynther, K. (2016a). Adaptive designs for learning based on MOOCs: a design framework for personalized learning in teacher professional development. In A. M. Nortvig, B. H. Sørensen, M. Misfeldt, R. Ørngren, B. Allsopp, B. Henningsen, and H. Hautopp (Eds.), Proceedings for the 5th international conference on designs for learning: designing new learning ecologies (pp. 46–63). Aalborg:
Aalborg Universitetsforlag . - Gynther, K. (2016b). Design framework for an adaptive MOOC enhanced by blended learning: supplementary training and personalized learning for teacher professional development. The Electronic Journal of eLearning, 14(1), 15–30.
- Khribi, M. K., Jemni, M., & Nasraoui, O. (2015).
Recommendation systems for personalized technology-enhanced learning . In R. H. Kinshuk (Eds.), Ubiquitous learning environments and technologies (pp. 159–180). Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44659-1_9 - Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. DOI: 10.4324/9780203125083
- McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2006).
Design research from a curriculum perspective . In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. Mckenney, and N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 67–90). London and New York, Routledge. - McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London and New York: Routledge.
- Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds – learning to be creative. Oxford: Capstone. DOI: 10.1002/9780857086549
- The U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2010). Transforming American education – learning powered by technology. National Education Technology Plan. Retrieved February 1, 2018, from
https://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/NETP-2010-final-report.pdf - van den Akker, J. (2003).
Curriculum perspectives: an introduction . In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, and U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-1205-7_1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.112 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 72 - 79
Submitted on: May 2, 2018
Accepted on: Jun 6, 2019
Published on: Jul 1, 2019
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2019 Anne Kristine Petersen, Peter Gundersen, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.