Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Diaphragm thickening fraction as a predictor of the need for ventilatory support in the emergency department: an observational pilot study Cover

Diaphragm thickening fraction as a predictor of the need for ventilatory support in the emergency department: an observational pilot study

Open Access
|Jun 2026

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Ultrasound protocol for the assessment of diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF). A. Schematic representation of diaphragmatic motion during inspiration and expiration: during inspiration, the diaphragm thickens and moves caudally, whereas during expiration it becomes thinner and ascends. B. Patient positioning in a semi-recumbent posture (30–45°) for standardized diaphragm ultrasound acquisition. C. Probe placement using a high-frequency linear transducer (7–12 MHz) along the right mid-axillary line at the 8th–9th intercostal space to visualize the diaphragm within the zone of apposition. D. M-mode ultrasound image illustrating measurements of diaphragm thickness at end-inspiration (T_ins) and end-expiration (T_exp), averaged over three consecutive tidal breaths. These measurements were used to calculate the diaphragm thickening fraction according to the formula: DTF = ((T_ins– T_exp) / T_exp) × 100

Tab. 1.

Baseline characteristics and diaphragmatic ultrasound parameters by ventilation status

VariablePopulation (n = 56)No ventilatory support (n = 34)Ventilatory support (n = 22)p-value
Sex (male), n (%)30 (54%)14 (41%)16 (73%)0.029
Age (years), median (IQR)80 (75–87)78 (74–87)84 (75–88)0.351
Charlson Comorbidity Index, median (IQR)6 (5–8)6 (5–8)6 (5–8)0.531
Dyspnea, n (%)55 (98%)33 (97%)22 (100%)1.000
Cough, n (%)15 (27%)9 (27%)6 (27%)1.000
Fever, n (%)16 (29%)11 (32%)5 (23%)0.550
End-inspiratory diaphragm thickness (mm), median (IQR)3.4 (2.7–5.0)3.40 (3.1–5.2)3.0 (2.4–4.5)0.052
End-expiratory diaphragm thickness (mm), median (IQR)2.5 (2.0–3.4)2.6 (2.0–3.5)2.3 (1.9–3.3)0.430
Diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF) (%), median (IQR)25.6 (17.5–35.2)29.8 (21.1–37.2)20.93 (10.6–26.8)0.006
PaO2/FiO2 ratio (mmHg), median (IQR)258 (216–318)282 (244–350)216 (169–248)0.003
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), median (IQR)130 (115–150)132 (110–155)130 (120–145)0.904
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), median (IQR)80 (65–90)80 (65–85)85 (64–90)0.283
Heart rate (bpm), median (IQR)92 (79–110)95 (79–110)89 (82–104)0.610
SpO2 (%), median (IQR)90 (85–94)91 (88–94)88 (84–94)0.289
Respiratory rate (bpm), median (IQR)21 (18–32)20 (18–22)29 (22–35)0.024
Body temperature (°C), median (IQR)36.5 (36.0–37.3)36.7 (36.0–37.6)36.1 (36.0–37.0)0.164
Oxygenation in the ED50 (89%)30 (88%)20 (91%)1.000
Oxygenation (hospital)44 (79%)25 (74%)19 (86%)0.329
LOS (days), median (IQR)12 (7–17)10 (5–14)14 (8–21)0.050
Death, n (%)7 (13%)4 (12%)3 (14%)1.000

[i] Values are reported as median (IQR) or n (%). P-values refer to between-group comparisons (no ventilatory support vs ventilatory support (NIV/IMV)). ED – emergency department; IMV – invasive mechanical ventilation; IQR – interquartile range; LOS – length of stay; NIV – non-invasive ventilation; SpO2, peripheral oxygen saturation; PaO2/FiO2 – arterial oxygen partial pressure to inspired oxygen fraction ratio

Fig. 2.

Comparison of diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) by ventilatory support status. Yellow box: No ventilatory support; Blue box: Ventilatory support (noninvasive ventilation or invasive mechanical ventilation); Left panel: Comparison of DTF in the emergency department (ED) based on ventilation status (p = 0.00087); Right panel: Comparison of DTF during hospitalization based on ventilation status (p = 0.0056)

Fig. 3.

Receiver operating characteristic curve for diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) in predicting the need for ventilatory support (non-invasive ventilation or invasive mechanical ventilation) from emergency department presentation through hospitalization. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.72 (95% CI 0.58–0.87). The optimal DTF cutoff identified using the Youden index was 22.1%, corresponding to a sensitivity of 0.59 and a specificity of 0.71 (blue point). The diagonal reference line represents no discriminative ability

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2026.0013 | Journal eISSN: 2451-070X | Journal ISSN: 2084-8404
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 10, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 9, 2026
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
Published by: MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS Sp. z o.o.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Carmine Cristiano Di Gioia, Alice Alame, Maria Lucrezia Grisan, Gianmarco Sicuranza, Eli Ollari, Filippo Orlando, Daniele Orso, published by MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS Sp. z o.o.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.