Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ultrasound assessment of abdominal wall muscle thickness in liver transplant recipients and healthy donors: a comparative study for the assessment of sarcopenia Cover

Ultrasound assessment of abdominal wall muscle thickness in liver transplant recipients and healthy donors: a comparative study for the assessment of sarcopenia

Open Access
|Jun 2025

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Measurement of hand grip strength using a handheld dynamometer
Measurement of hand grip strength using a handheld dynamometer

Fig. 2.

Measurement of L3-SMI (Colors represent the following muscles: purple – rectus abdominis; green – psoas major; red – erector spinae; blue – quadratus lumborum; yellow – abdominal wall muscle)
Measurement of L3-SMI (Colors represent the following muscles: purple – rectus abdominis; green – psoas major; red – erector spinae; blue – quadratus lumborum; yellow – abdominal wall muscle)

Fig. 3.

Measurement of abdominal muscle thickness using ultrasonography (A – external oblique; B – internal oblique; C – transversus abdominis)
Measurement of abdominal muscle thickness using ultrasonography (A – external oblique; B – internal oblique; C – transversus abdominis)

Fig. 4.

ROC curve using L3-SMI values for males
ROC curve using L3-SMI values for males

Fig. 5.

Scatter plots showing correlations between abdominal muscle thickness of EO with (A) duration of ICU, IO with (B) ascitic fluid volume, TA with (C) Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores, TA with (D) ascitic fluid volume, and TA with (E) duration of ICU and in liver transplant recipients. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. (EO – external oblique; IO – internal oblique; TA – transversus abdominis)
Scatter plots showing correlations between abdominal muscle thickness of EO with (A) duration of ICU, IO with (B) ascitic fluid volume, TA with (C) Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores, TA with (D) ascitic fluid volume, and TA with (E) duration of ICU and in liver transplant recipients. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. (EO – external oblique; IO – internal oblique; TA – transversus abdominis)

Demographic data, abdominal muscle thickness, and sarcopenia assessment in the study population

ParameterDonors (n = 41)Recipients (n = 41)P value
Male/Female12/29 (29%/71%)38/3 (93%/7%)
Age (yrs)34.5 ± 9.148.9±10.5<0.0001
Height (cm)161.5 ± 10.0166 ± 6.60.018
Weight (kg)66.2 ± 10.767.4 ± 12.70.645
BMI (kg/m2)24.7 ± 5.0324.2 ± 3.80.45
External oblique (mm)4.5 ± 1.82.9 ± 1.0<0.001
Internal oblique (mm)6 ± 2.44.1 ± 1.60.001
Transversus abdominis (mm)3.2 ± 12.2 ± 0.7<0.001
L3-SMI (cm2/m2)44.6 ± 10.236.3 ± 8.4<0.001
Hand grip strength (kg)24.1 ± 6.221.2 ± 5.40.06

Postoperative outcomes in sarcopenia vs non-sarcopenia groups

L3-SMIHand Grip StrengthEO thicknessIO thicknessTA thickness
Postoperative outcomeSarcopenia (n = 32)No sarcopenia (n = 7)p valueSarcopenia (n = 33)No sarcopenia (n = 6)p valueSarcopenia (n = 29)No sarcopenia (n = 9)p valueSarcopenia (n = 26)No sarcopenia (n = 12)p valueSarcopenia (n = 27)No sarcopenia (n = 11)p value
Pleural effusion (%)75.942.90.167160.00.6379.244.40.0968.471.4177.354.50.24
Pneumonia (%)44.814.30.260.0036.20.355022.20.2447.435.70.73445.536.40.71
Duration of MV (hrs)15.9 ± 6.311.6 ± 4.20.9015.6 ± 5.914.4 ± 4.00.6117.9 ± 6.111.8 ± 3.70.1816.6 ± 5.515.6 ± 4.10.8018.3 ± 6.811.6 ± 3.50.13
Duration of ICU stay (days)13.0 ± 4.49.9 ± 3.20.3712.0 ± 3.910.8 ± 2.70.5313.9 ± 4.67.3 ± 2.40.0414.1 ± 4.29.5 ± 3.10.1314.8 ± 4.96.7 ± 2.50.007
Mortality in 30 days (%)17.200.55160.000.0714.3100.6815.87.10.6218.200.276

Receiver-operating characteristic curves of muscle thickness values predicting sarcopenia by comparison with L3 SMI

Cut-off by L3-SMI (mm)Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)AUCStandard error95% confidence interval
External oblique thicknessMales3.67880.60.840.050.73–0.96
Females3.746.4400.490.160.16–0.82
Internal oblique thicknessMales4.871.867.70.800.060.68–0.93
Females4.950400.630.140.35–0.92
Transversus abdominis thicknessMales2.5577.874.20.830.060.71–0.96
Females2.840400.550.150.23–0.86

Gender-specific analysis of muscle thickness and sarcopenia in the study population

ParameterDonors male (n = 12)Recipients male (n = 38)p valueDonors Female (n = 29)Recipients female (n = 3)p value
External oblique (mm)6.2 ± 1.53.0 ± 1.2<0.0013.8 ± 0.91.8 ± 0.50.008
Internal oblique (mm)8.2 ± 2.04.0 ± 1.30.0018.2 ± 2.04.0 ± 1.30.001
Transversus abdominis (mm)4.0 ± 1.22.2 ± 0.7<0.0012.9 ± 0.81.8 ± 0.40.002
L3-SMI (cm2/m2)49.4 ± 12.236.0 ± 9.2<0.00142.8 ± 11.239.6 ± 10.50.30
Hand grip strength (kg)32.7 ± 8.221.5 ± 5.40.00121.0 ± 4.221.1 ± 5.10.96

Correlation of muscle thickness with ascitic fluid volume and postoperative outcomes

MeldCTPAscitic fluid volumePleural EffusionPneumoniaReintubationDuration of Mechanical VentilationDuration of ICU StayMortality
External obliquePearson Correlation0.024−0.034−0.330.270.150.27−0.24−0.460.26
P value0.0880.8310.030.110.380.110.120.0050.12
Internal obliquePearson Correlation−0.093−0.296−0.580.040.020.12−0.08−0.280.11
P value0.5640.06<0.0010.800.890.460.620.100.49
Transversus abdominisPearson Correlation−0.279−0.460−0.410.18−0.0010.24−0.07−0.370.25
P value0.0770.0020.0080.280.990.150.650.0290.13
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2025.0020 | Journal eISSN: 2451-070X | Journal ISSN: 2084-8404
Language: English
Submitted on: May 13, 2025
|
Accepted on: Jun 25, 2025
|
Published on: Jun 30, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Shweta Aghi, Udit Dhingra, Gaurav Sindwani, Anil Yadav, Jaya Benjamin, Kanika Bansal, Viniyendra Pamecha, Deepak K. Tempe, published by MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS Sp. z o.o.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.