References
- Facilities Guidelines Institute, United States, Department of Health and Human Services, and American Society for Healthcare Engineering. Guidelines for Design and Construction of Health Care Facilities. 2010 ed. Chicago, IL: ASHE American Society for Healthcare Engineering of the American Hospital Association, 2010. Available from:
https://fgiguidelines.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/2010_FGI_Guidelines.pdf . - Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM: The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2006; 81: 207–212. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002.
- Sweileh WM: Global research activity on e-learning in health sciences education: a bibliometric analysis. Med Sci Educ 2021; 31: 765–775. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01254-6.
- Dietrich CF, Lucius C, Nielsen MB, Burmester E, Westerway SC, Chu CY et al.: The ultrasound use of simulators, current view, and perspectives: Requirements and technical aspects (WFUMB state of the art paper). Endosc Ultrasound 2023; 12: 38–49. doi: 10.4103/eus-d-22-00197.
- Lucius C, Koch JBH, Jenssen C, Karlas T, Sänger SL, Dietrich CF: State of the art: Simulation in der Ultraschallausbildung. Z Gastroenterol 2024; 62: 723–736. German. doi: 10.1055/a-2183-1888.
- Lucius C, Nielsen MB, Blaivas M, Burmester E, Westerway SC, Chu CY et al.: The use of simulation in medical ultrasound: Current perspectives on applications and practical implementation (WFUMB state-of-the-art paper). Endosc Ultrasound 2023; 12: 311–318. doi: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000022.
- Stoehr F, Müller L, Brady A, Trilla A, Mähringer-Kunz A, Hahn F et al.: How COVID-19 kick-started online learning in medical education – The DigiMed study. PLoS One 2021; 16: e0257394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257394.
- Brika SKM, Chergui K, Algamdi A, Musa AA, Zouaghi R: E-Learning Research Trends in Higher Education in Light of COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 762819. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.762819.
- Höhne E, Schäfer VS, Neubauer R, Gotta J, Reschke P, Wittek A et al.: A four year follow-up survey on the teledidactic TELUS ultrasound course: long-term benefits and implications. BMC Med Educ 2024; 24: 1022. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05993-z.
- Höhne E, Recker F, Brossart P, Schäfer VS: Teledidactic Versus Hands-on Teaching of Abdominal, Thoracic, and Thyroid Ultrasound – The TELUS II Study. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39: 1803–1810. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08760-4.
- Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, Abdelwahed A, Al-Nusair L: Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e042378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378.
- Daum N, Boten D, Schutz T, Sendeski M, Spethmann S: Erwerb von Medienkompetenz zur Durchführung eines synchronen Online-Tutoriums zur Entwicklung fachlich-methodischer Basiskompetenzen in der medizinischen Aus- und Weiterbildung. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA). Zürich, Schweiz 2021. doi: 10.3205/21gma142.
- Boten DN, Daum N, Schutz T, Spethmann S: From Videogames to Teaching – Different Camera Perspectives in an Interactive Synchronous Online Tutorial. Med Sci Educ 2023; 33: 1029–1031. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01833-9.
- Altersberger M, Pavelka P, Sachs A, Weber M, Wagner-Menghin M, Prosch H: Student Perceptions of Instructional Ultrasound Videos as Preparation for a Practical Assessment. Ultrasound Int Open 2019; 5: E81–E8. doi: 10.1055/a-1024-4573.
- Horn CL, Müller L, Dirks K, Weinmann-Menke J, Weimer A, Diorio F et al.: Comparison of two different (digital vs. analog) ultrasound learning devices – the „DIvAN-study”. Ultraschall Med 2022; 43(S 01): 78. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749575.
- Chan TM, Stehman C, Gottlieb M, Thoma B: A Short History of Free Open Access Medical Education. The Past, Present, and Future. ATS Sch 2020; 1: 87–100. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0014PS.
- Latif MZ, Hussain I, Saeed R, Qureshi MA, Maqsood U: Use of Smart Phones and Social Media in Medical Education: Trends, Advantages, Challenges and Barriers. Acta Inform Med 2019; 27: 133–138. doi: 10.5455/aim.2019.27.133-138.
- D'Souza F, Shah S, Oki O, Scrivens L, Guckian J: Social media: medical education's double-edged sword. Future Healthc J 2021; 8: e307–e10. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0164.
- Guckian J, Utukuri M, Asif A, Burton O, Adeyoju J, Oumeziane A et al.: Social media in undergraduate medical education: A systematic review. Med Educ 2021; 55: 1227–1241. doi: 10.1111/medu.14567.
- Mallin M, Schlein S, Doctor S, Stroud S, Dawson M, Fix M: A survey of the current utilization of asynchronous education among emergency medicine residents in the United States. Acad Med 2014; 89: 598–601. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000170.
- Premkumar K, Pahwa P, Banerjee A, Baptiste K, Bhatt H, Lim HJ: Does medical training promote or deter self-directed learning? A longitudinal mixed-methods study. Acad Med 2013; 88: 1754–1764. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a9262d.
- Reed S, Shell R, Kassis K, Tartaglia K, Wallihan R, Smith K et al.: Applying adult learning practices in medical education. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2014; 44: 170–181. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2014.01.008.
- Chenkin J, Lee S, Huynh T, Bandiera G: Procedures can be learned on the Web: a randomized study of ultrasound-guided vascular access training. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15: 949–954. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00231.x.
- Hempel D, Haunhorst S, Sinnathurai S, Seibel A, Recker F, Heringer F et al.: Social media to supplement point-of-care ultrasound courses: the “sandwich e-learning” approach. A randomized trial. Crit Ultrasound J 2016; 8: 3. doi: 10.1186/s13089-016-0037-9.
- Coiffier B, Shen PCH, Lee EYP, Kwong TSP, Lai AYT, Wong EMF et al.: Introducing point-of-care ultrasound through structured multifaceted ultrasound module in the undergraduate medical curriculum at the University of Hong Kong. Ultrasound 2020; 28: 38–46. doi: 10.1177/1742271X19847224.
- Lin-Martore M, Olvera MP, Kornblith AE, Zapala M, Addo N, Lin M et al.: Evaluating a Web-based Point-of-care Ultrasound Curriculum for the Diagnosis of Intussusception. AEM Educ Train 2021; 5: e10526. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10526.
- Situ-LaCasse E, Acuña J, Huynh D, Amini R, Irving S, Samsel K et al.: Can ultrasound novices develop image acquisition skills after reviewing online ultrasound modules? BMC Med Educ 2021; 21: 175. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02612-z.
- Alsafi N, Alsafi A: Instagram: A platform for ultrasound education? Ultrasound 2021; 29: 44–47. doi: 10.1177/1742271X20920908.
- Lien WC, Lin P, Chang CH, Wu MC, Wu CY: The effect of e-learning on point-of-care ultrasound education in novices. Med Educ Online 2023; 28: 2152522. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2152522.
- Blank V, Strobel D, Karlas T: Digital Training Formats in Ultrasound Diagnostics for physicians: What options are available and how can they be successfully integrated into current DEGUM certified course concepts? Ultraschall Med 2022; 43: 428–434. doi: 10.1055/a-1900-8166.
- Hempel D, Sinnathurai S, Haunhorst S, Seibel A, Michels G, Heringer F et al.: Influence of case-based e-learning on students' performance in point-of-care ultrasound courses: a randomized trial. Eur J Emerg Med 2015. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000270.
- Räschle N, Hari R: [Blended Learning Basic Course Sonography – A SGUM Accredited Ultrasound Course Based on Peer-Tutoring]. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2018; 107: 1255–1259. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003116.
- Rosenfeldt Nielsen M, Kristensen EQ, Jensen RO, Mollerup AM, Pfeiffer T, Graumann O: Clinical Ultrasound Education for Medical Students: Virtual Reality Versus e-Learning, a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Ultrasound Q 2021; 37: 292–296. doi: 10.1097/ruq.0000000000000558.
- Perice L, Naraghi L, Likourezos A, Singh H, Haines L: Implementation of a novel digital ultrasound education tool into an emergency medicine rotation: Ultra-soundBox. AEM Educ Train 2022; 6: e10765. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10765.
- Duarte ML, Santos LRD, Iared W, Peccin MS: Comparison of ultrasonography learning between distance teaching and traditional methodology. An educational systematic review. Sao Paulo Med. J 2022; 140: 806–817. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.1047.R.19052022.
- Dietrich CF, Sirli RL, Barth G, Blaivas M, Daum N, Dong Y et al.: Student ultrasound education – current views and controversies. Ultraschall Med 2024; 45: 389–394. doi: 10.1055/a-2265-1070.
- Krüger R, Weinmann-Menke J, Buggenhange H, Kurz S, Bellhäuser H, Weimer AM et al.: Blended Learning improves FoCUS cardiac ultrasound training for undergraduates-a prospective, controlled, randomized single-center study. Ultraschall in der Medizin – European Journal of Ultrasound. 2023; 44. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772433.
- Neubauer R, Bauer CJ, Dietrich CF, Strizek B, Schäfer VS, Recker F: Evidence-based Ultrasound Education? – A Systematic Literature Review of Undergraduate Ultrasound Training Studies. Ultrasound Int Open 2024; 10: a22750702. doi: 10.1055/a-2275-0702.
- Daum N, Blaivas M, Goudie A, Hoffmann B, Jenssen C, Neubauer R et al.: Student ultrasound education, current view and controversies. Role of Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Reality and telemedicine. Ultrasound J 2024; 16: 44. doi: 10.1186/s13089-024-00382-5.
- Daum N, Neubauer R, Boten D, Dietrich CF: Studentische Ultraschall-Ausbil-dung: Rolle von Künstlicher Intelligenz, Virtueller Realität und Telemedizin. Ultraschall Med 2024; 45(S 01): A-287. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1789051.
- Kahr Rasmussen N, Nayahangan LJ, Carlsen J, Ekberg O, Brabrand K, Albrecht-Beste E et al.: Evaluation of competence in ultrasound-guided procedures – a generic assessment tool developed through the Delphi method. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 4203–4211. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07280-z.
- Eder N, Daum N, Seckinger DA, Nürnberg D, Jenssen C: A National Register for Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS) in Germany: outline and preliminary results of a pilot study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2022; 48: S76. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.04.210.
- Lorentzen T, Nolsøe CP, Ewertsen C, Nielsen MB, Leen E, Havre RF et al.: EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. General Aspects (long Version). Ultraschall Med 2015; 36: E1–14. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1553593.
- O'Leary FM, Janson P: Can e-learning improve medical students' knowledge and competence in paediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation? A prospective before and after study. Emerg Med Australas 2010; 22: 324–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01302.x.
- Emanuel EJ: The Inevitable Reimagining of Medical Education. JAMA 2020; 323: 1127–1128. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1227.
- Lewis KO, Cidon MJ, Seto TL, Chen H, Mahan JD: Leveraging e-learning in medical education. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2014; 44: 150–163. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2014.01.004.
- Welsh J, Lu Y, Dhruva SS, Bikdeli B, Desai NR, Benchetrit L et al.: Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1: e181065. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1065.
- Dietrich CF, Hoffmann B, Cantisani V, Dong Y, Hari R, Nisenbaum H et al.: Medical Student Ultrasound Education, a WFUMB Position Paper, Part I, response to the letter to the Editor. Ultrasound Med Biol 2019; 45: 1857–1859. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.02.020.
- Thoma B, Sebok-Syer SS, Krishnan K, Siemens M, Trueger NS, Colmers-Gray I et al.: Individual Gestalt Is Unreliable for the Evaluation of Quality in Medical Education Blogs: A METRIQ Study. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 70: 394–401. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.12.025.
- Azim A, Beck-Esmay J, Chan TM: Editorial Processes in Free Open Access Medical Educational (FOAM) Resources. AEM Educ Train 2018; 2: 204–212. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10097.
- Chan TM, Grock A, Paddock M, Kulasegaram K, Yarris LM, Lin M: Examining Reliability and Validity of an Online Score (ALiEM AIR) for Rating Free Open Access Medical Education Resources. Ann Emerg Med 2016; 68: 729–735. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.02.018.
- Thoma B, Chan TM, Kapur P, Sifford D, Siemens M, Paddock M et al.: The Social Media Index as an Indicator of Quality for Emergency Medicine Blogs: A METRIQ Study. Ann Emerg Med 2018; 72: 696–702. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.05.003.
- Mese I, Altintas Taslicay C, Kuzan BN, Kuzan TY, Sivrioglu AK: Educating the next generation of radiologists: a comparative report of ChatGPT and e-learning resources. Diagn Interv Radiol 2024; 30: 163–174. doi: 10.4274/dir.2023.232496.
- Stuntz R, Clontz R: An Evaluation of Emergency Medicine Core Content Covered by Free Open Access Medical Education Resources. Ann Emerg Med 2016; 67: 649–653: e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.12.020.
- Tolsgaard MG, Todsen T, Sorensen JL, Ringsted C, Lorentzen T, Ottesen B et al.: International multispecialty consensus on how to evaluate ultrasound competence: a Delphi consensus survey. PLoS One 2013; 8: e57687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057687.
- Lorentzen T, Nolsoe CP, Ewertsen C, Nielsen MB, Leen E, Havre RF et al.: EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. General Aspects (long Version). Ultraschall Med 2015; 36: E1–14. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1553593.
- Dyre L, Tabor A, Ringsted C, Tolsgaard MG: Imperfect practice makes perfect: error management training improves transfer of learning. Med Educ 2017; 51: 196–206. doi: 10.1111/medu.13208.
- Lufler RS, Zumwalt AC, Romney CA, Hoagland TM: Effect of visual-spatial ability on medical students' performance in a gross anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ 2012; 5: 3–9. doi: 10.1002/ase.264.
- Canty DJ, Hayes JA, Story DA, Royse CF: Ultrasound simulator-assisted teaching of cardiac anatomy to preclinical anatomy students: A pilot randomized trial of a three-hour learning exposure. Anat Sci Educ 2015; 8: 21–30. doi: 10.1002/ase.1452.
- Hu KC, Salcedo D, Kang YN, Lin CW, Hsu CW, Cheng CY et al.: Impact of virtual reality anatomy training on ultrasound competency development: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0242731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242731.
- Halpern SA, Brace EJ, Hall AJ, Morrison RG, Patel DV, Yuh JY et al.: 3-D modeling applications in ultrasound education: a systematic review. Ultrasound Med Biol 2022; 48: 188–197. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.09.018.
- Weimer J, Recker F, Hasenburg A, Buggenhagen H, Karbach K, Beer L et al.: Development and evaluation of a “simulator-based” ultrasound training program for university teaching in obstetrics and gynecology – the prospective GynSim study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11: 1371141. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1371141.
- Chalouhi GE, Quibel T, Lamourdedieu C, Hajal NJ, Gueneuc A, Benzina N et al.: [Obstetrical ultrasound simulator as a tool for improving teaching strategies for beginners: Pilot study and review of the literature]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2016; 45: 1107–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.12.011.
- Bentley S, Mudan G, Strother C, Wong N: Are Live Ultrasound Models Replaceable? Traditional versus Simulated Education Module for FAST Exam. West J Emerg Med 2015; 16: 818–822. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.9.27276.
- Le CK, Lewis J, Steinmetz P, Dyachenko A, Oleskevich S: The Use of Ultrasound Simulators to Strengthen Scanning Skills in Medical Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38: 1249–1257. doi: 10.1002/jum.14805.
- Andersen NL, Jensen RO, Konge L, Laursen CB, Falster C, Jacobsen N et al.: Immersive Virtual Reality in Basic Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ultrasound Med Biol 2023; 49: 178–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.08.012.
- Bowman A, Reid D, Bobby Harreveld R, Lawson C: Evaluation of post-simulation sonographer students' professional behaviour in the workplace. Radiography (Lond) 2022; 28: 889–896. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.06.010.
- Hattle J: The Applicability of Visible Learning to Higher Education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 2015; 1: 79–91. doi: 10.1037/stl0000021.
- Johri AM, Durbin J, Newbigging J, Tanzola R, Chow R, De S, Tam J: Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound: State-of-the-Art in Medical School Education. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2018; 31: 749–760. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.01.014.
- Bjerrum F, Thomsen ASS, Nayahangan LJ, Konge L: Surgical simulation: Current practices and future perspectives for technical skills training. Med Teach 2018; 40: 668–675. doi: 10.1080/0142159x.2018.1472754.
- AlQhtani A, AlSwedan N, Almulhim A, Aladwan R, Alessa Y, AlQhtani K et al.: Online versus classroom teaching for medical students during COVID-19: measuring effectiveness and satisfaction. BMC Med Educ 2021; 21: 452. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02888-1.
- Lewiss RE, Hoffmann B, Beaulieu Y, Phelan MB: Point-of-care ultrasound education: the increasing role of simulation and multimedia resources. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 27–32. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.1.27.
- Lane N, Lahham S, Joseph L, Bahner DP, Fox JC: Ultrasound in medical education: listening to the echoes of the past to shape a vision for the future. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2015; 41: 461–467. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0535-7.
- Cawthorn TR, Nickel C, O'Reilly M, Kafka H, Tam JW, Jackson LC et al.: Development and evaluation of methodologies for teaching focused cardiac ultrasound skills to medical students. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014; 27: 302–309. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.12.006.
- Vallee A, Blacher J, Cariou A, Sorbets E: Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e16504. doi: 10.2196/16504.
- Back SJ, Darge K, Bedoya MA, Delgado J, Gorfu Y, Zewdneh D et al.: Ultrasound Tutorials in Under 10 Minutes: Experience and Results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207: 653–660. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16402.
- Delungahawatta T, Dunne SS, Hyde S, Halpenny L, McGrath D, O'Regan A et al.: Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ 2022; 22: 711. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03773-1.
- Gunabushanam G, Nautsch F, Mills I, Scoutt LM. Accessible Personal Ultra-sound Training Simulator. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38: 1425–1432. doi: 10.1002/jum.14820.
- MFT Medizinischer Fakultätentag der Bundesrepublik Deutschland e.V. Nationaler Kompetenzbasierter Lernzielkatalog Medizin (NKLM) 2015. Available from:
https://medizinische-fakultaeten.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/nklm_final_2015-12-04.pdf . (access: 20.01.2025)