Comparison of sonographic hepatorenal ratio and the degree of hepatic steatosis in magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction

Tanpowpong, Natthaporn; Panichyawat, Sineenart

doi:10.15557/jou.2020.0028

Abstract

Objectives: Conventional ultrasonography can provide only semi-quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis. The aim of this study was to assess sonographic hepatorenal ratio to quantify the severity of fatty liver. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 179 patients with various liver diseases who underwent abdominal magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography on the same day. The hepatorenal ratio was calculated by the ratio between the mean echo intensity in regions of interests of the liver and regions of interests of the right renal cortex. Magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction was used as standard reference for steatosis grading. The effect of fibrosis measured by magnetic resonance elastography on the degree of correlation was also assessed. Results: The hepatorenal ratio was highly correlated with magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (Spearman’s coefficient = 0.83) (p <0.001). High correlation of hepatorenal ratio with magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction was observed in patients with less than stage 2 fibrosis (p <0.001), whereas moderate correlation of hepatorenal ratio with magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction was found in patients with ≥ stage 2 fibrosis or higher (p <0.001). The hepatorenal ratio cutoff point for prediction of grade 1 hepatic steatosis was 1.18 with sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 80.0%. The hepatorenal ratio cutoff point for prediction of grade 2 and grade 3 hepatic steatosis was 1.55 and 1.60, respectively, with sensitivity greater than 90% and specificity greater than 80%. Conclusions: The hepatorenal ratio could become an effective quantitative tool for hepatic steatosis alternative to magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction. Application should be careful in the group of patients with stage 2 liver fibrosis or higher.

References

Reeder SB, Sirlin CB: Quantification of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010; 18: 337–357, ix.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Abd El-Kader SM, El-Den Ashmawy EM: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: The diagnosis and management. World J Hepatol 2015; 7: 846–858.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Szczepaniak LS, Nurenberg P, Leonard D, Browning JD, Reingold JS, Grundy S et al.: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure hepatic triglyceride content: prevalence of hepatic steatosis in the general population. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005; 288: E462–E468.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lok AS, Everhart JE, Chung RT, Padmanabhan L, Greenson JK, Shiffman ML et al.: Hepatic steatosis in hepatitis C: comparison of diabetic and nondiabetic patients in the hepatitis C antiviral long-term treatment against cirrhosis trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 245–254.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fartoux L, Chazouilleres O, Wendum D, Poupon R, Serfaty L: Impact of steatosis on progression of fibrosis in patients with mild hepatitis C. Hepatology 2005; 41: 82–87.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reeder SB, Cruite I, Hamilton G, Sirlin CB: Quantitative assessment of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34: 729–749.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
National Guideline Centre (UK): Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: assessment and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK) 2016; 6. Dostęp online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK384715/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Regev A, Berho M, Jeffers LJ, Milikowski C, Molina EG, Pyrsopoulos NT et al.: Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 2614–2618.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, Gombert S, Giral P, Bruckert E et al.: Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 1898–1906.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kinner S, Reeder SB, Yokoo T: Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers of NAFLD. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61: 1337–1347.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Noureddin M, Lam J, Peterson MR, Middleton M, Hamilton G, Le TA et al.: Utility of magnetic resonance imaging versus histology for quantifying changes in liver fat in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease trials. Hepatology 2013; 58: 1930–1940.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kang GH, Cruite I, Shiehmorteza M, Wolfson T, Gamst AC, Hamilton G et al.: Reproducibility of MRI-determined proton density fat fraction across two different MR scanner platforms. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34: 928–934.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meisamy S, Hines CD, Hamilton G, Sirlin CB, McKenzie CA, Yu H et al.: Quantification of hepatic steatosis with T1-independent, T2-corrected MR imaging with spectral modeling of fat: blinded comparison with MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2011; 258: 767–775.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Idilman IS, Aniktar H, Idilman R, Kabacam G, Savas B, Elhan A et al.: Hepatic steatosis: quantification by proton density fat fraction with MR imaging versus liver biopsy. Radiology 2013; 267: 767–775.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rehm JL, Wolfgram PM, Hernando D, Eickhoff JC, Allen DB, Reeder SB: Proton density fat-fraction is an accurate biomarker of hepatic steatosis in adolescent girls and young women. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 2921–2930.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Permutt Z, Le TA, Peterson MR, Seki E, Brenner DA, Sirlin C et al.: Correlation between liver histology and novel magnetic resonance imaging in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease – MRI accurately quantifies hepatic steatosis in NAFLD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 36: 22–29.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tang A, Tan J, Sun M, Hamilton G, Bydder M, Wolfson T et al.: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis. Radiology 2013; 267: 422–431.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Palmentieri B, de Sio I, La Mura V, Masarone M, Vecchione R, Bruno S et al.: The role of bright liver echo pattern on ultrasound B-mode examination in the diagnosis of liver steatosis. Dig Liver Dis 2006; 38: 485–489.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Osawa H, Mori Y: Sonographic diagnosis of fatty liver using a histogram technique that compares liver and renal cortical echo amplitudes. J Clin Ultrasound 1996; 24: 25–29.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Webb M, Yeshua H, Zelber-Sagi S, Santo E, Brazowski E, Halpern Z et al.: Diagnostic value of a computerized hepatorenal index for sonographic quantification of liver steatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 909–914.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mancini M, Prinster A, Annuzzi G, Liuzzi R, Giacco R, Medagli C et al.: Sonographic hepatic-renal ratio as indicator of hepatic steatosis: comparison with 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Metabolism 2009; 58: 1724–1730.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marshall RH, Eissa M, Bluth EI, Gulotta PM, Davis NK: Hepatorenal index as an accurate, simple, and effective tool in screening for steatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: 997–1002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Borges VF, Diniz AL, Cotrim HP, Rocha HL, Andrade NB: Sonographic hepatorenal ratio: a noninvasive method to diagnose nonalcoholic steatosis. J Clin Ultrasound 2013; 41: 18–25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martin-Rodriguez JL, Arrebola JP, Jimenez-Moleon JJ, Olea N, Gonzalez-Calvin JL: Sonographic quantification of a hepato-renal index for the assessment of hepatic steatosis in comparison with 3T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26: 88–94.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang B, Ding F, Chen T, Xia LH, Qian J, Lv GY: Ultrasound hepatic/renal ratio and hepatic attenuation rate for quantifying liver fat content. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 17985–17992.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Babu AS, Wells ML, Teytelboym OM, Mackey JE, Miller FH, Yeh BM et al.: Elastography in chronic liver disease: modalities, techniques, limitations, and future directions. Radiographics 2016; 36: 1987–2006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Middleton MS, Heba ER, Hooker CA, Bashir MR, Fowler KJ, Sandrasegaran K et al.: Agreement between magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction measurements and pathologist-assigned steatosis grades of liver biopsies from adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 2017; 153: 753–761.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kim M, Kang B-K, Jun DW: Comparison of conventional sonographic signs and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction for assessment of hepatic steatosis. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 7759.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shiralkar K, Johnson S, Bluth EI, Marshall RH, Dornelles A, Gulotta PM: Improved method for calculating hepatic steatosis using the hepatorenal index. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34: 1051–1059.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Loy M, Serra G, Chessa L: The prevalence of bright liver echo pattern in patients with chronic hepatitis C: correlation with steatosis and fibrosis. J Ultrasound 2014; 19: 91–98.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Perez NE, Siddiqui FA, Mutchnick MG, Dhar R, Tobi M, Ullah N et al.: Ultrasound diagnosis of fatty liver in patients with chronic liver disease: a retrospective observational study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41: 624–629.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Petta S, Maida M, Macaluso FS, Di Marco V, Cammà C, Cabibi D, Craxì A: The severity of steatosis influences liver stiffness measurement in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2015; 62: 1101–1110.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Samir AE, Dhyani M, Vij A, Bhan AK, Halpern EF, Méndez-Navarro J et al.: Shear-wave elastography for the estimation of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: determining accuracy and ideal site for measurement. Radiology 2015; 274: 888–896.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Comparison of sonographic hepatorenal ratio and the degree of hepatic steatosis in magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction

Abstract

Paradigm

My account