The Impact of the State of the Ecosystem on the Quality of Produced Organic Products in a Sustainable Development

Nifatova, Olena; Lutska, Tetiana; Shcherbak, Valeriia; Ganushchak-Yefimenko, Liudmyla; Krakhmalova, Nina; Goncharenko, Iryna; Shkoda, Mariana

doi:10.15544/mts.2022.03

Abstract

The modern economic paradigm of implementation and consumption of agricultural organic products, based on the theoretical concepts of food security of each country, is a kind of “marker of cultural identity” of modern society. In today’s world, more and more people want to lead a healthy lifestyle and consume organic products. In this regard, the impact of the state of the ecosystem on the production of organic agricultural products in the context of sustainable development is high. The system of assessing the state of the ecosystem by four components: atmosphere, water resources, soil, waste pollution and green plantations is proposed. A model for assessing the impact of the state of the ecosystem on the quality of organic production is proposed based on data from 24 regions of Ukraine.

References

Adhikari, B. (2021). The economics of common pool resources. Ecology, Economy and Society – the INSEE Journal. 4(1): 71–88.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Axelsson, C., Sebille, E. (2017). Prevention through policy: Urban macroplastic leakages to the marine environment during extreme rainfall events. Mar Pollut Bull, 124(1): 211-27.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cairns, J. (1997). Protecting the delivery of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Health. 3: 185-194.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Callicott, J. (1997). Fallacious fallacies and nonsolutions: comment on Kristin Shrader-Frechette’s “Ecological risk assessment and ecosystem health: fallacies and solutions”. Ecosystem Health. 3: 133-135.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chopra, K. (2021). Nature and socio-economic systems: a narrative of conflict and adaptation. Ecology, Economy and Society – the INSEE Journal, 4(1): 1–3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chorran, T., Kuchimanchi, B., Karmakar, S., Sharma, H., Ghosh, D., Priyadarshini, P. (2021). Understanding How Local - level Environment Stewardship Initiatives Increase Livelihood Resilience to Climate Change: Insights from Rajasthan, India. Ecology, Economy and Society – the INSEE Journal. 4(1): 89–112.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Costanza, R. (2020). Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability. Ecosystem Services. 43:101096.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., De Groot, S., Farber, M., Grasso, B., Hannon, K., Limburg, S., Naeem, R., O’Neill, J., Paruelo, R., Raskin, P., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature.387(6630):253.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Delgado, L., Marín, V. (2020). Ecosystem services and ecosystem degradation: Environmentalist’s expectation? Ecosystem Services. 45:101177.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dinerstein, E., Vynne, E., Sala, E., Joshi, A., Fernando, S., Lovejoy, T., Mayorga, J., Olson, D., Asner, G., Baillie, J., Burgess, N., Burkart, K., Noss, R., Zhang, Y., Baccini, A., Birch, T., Hahn, N., Joppa, L., Wikramanayake, E. (2019). A global deal for nature: Guiding principles, milestones, and targets. Science Advances 5(4): eaaw2869.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
El-Shahawi, M., Hamza, A., Bashammakh, A., Al-Saggaf, W. (2010). An overview on the accumulation, distribution, transformations, toxicity and analytical methods for the monitoring of persistent organic pollutants. Talanta. 80 (5): 1587-1597.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gambhir, A., Tavoni, M. (2019). Direct air carbon capture and sequestration: how it works and how it could contribute to climate-change mitigation. One Earth. 1 (4): 405-409.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Thatam, R., Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. - Prentice-Hall, International, Inc.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heshmati, M., Gheitury, M., Garibreza, M. (2021). Quality of river water for irrigation and drinking uses and sources of contamination in upper catchment areas. ECOPERSIA. 9(2): 119-129
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jabbour, J., Flachsland, C. (2017). 40 years of global environmental assessments: A retrospective analysis. Environmental Science and Policy. 77: 193-202.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johnston, E., Keough, M. (2005). Reduction of pollution impacts through the control of toxicant release rate must be site- and season-specific. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 320 (1): 9-33.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Menzel, S., Teng, J. (2010). Ecosystem services as a stakeholder-driven concept for conservation science. Conservation Biology. 24(3): 907-909.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Neoh, C., Noor, Z., Mutamim, N., Lim, C. (2016). Green technology in wastewater treatment technologies: integration of membrane bioreactor with various wastewater treatment systems. Chemical engineering journal. 283: 582-594.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OECD. Agricultural land (indicator), 2020. - https://data.oecd.org/agrland/agricultural-land.htm [Accessed on 16 May 2020].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pinto, U, Maheshwari, B. (2014). A framework for assessing river health in peri-urban landscape. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol. 14(2): 121-31.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rutkin, A. (2015). Hackathon invents the tools to fix Congress. New Scientist. 225(3008):22.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sakizadeh, M. (2020). Comparison of time series forecasting techniques applied for water quality prediction in southwest Iran. ECOPERSIA, 8(4): 199-208.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seng, B., Fujiwara, T., Seng, B. (2018). Suitability assessment for handling methods of municipal solid waste. . Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management. 4(2): 113-126. doi: 10.22034/gjesm.2018.04.02.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shcherbak, V., Ganushchak-Yefimenko, L., Nifatova, O., Fastovets, N., Plysenko, G., Lutay, L., Tkachuk, V., Ptashchenko, O. (2020). Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 6(2): 175-190.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shcherbak, V., Gryshchenko, I., Ganushchak-Yefimenko, L., Nifatova, O., Tkachuk, V., Kostiuk, T., Hotra, V. (2021). Using a sharing-platform to prevent a new outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in rural areas. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 7(2): 155-170.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The World of Organic Agriculture 2020. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2020 Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL IFOAM – Organics International http:.www.organic-world.net/yearbook/yearbook-2020.html
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Turner, B., Lambin, E., Reenberg, A. (2007). The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(52): 20666-20671.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Verburg, P., Crossman, N., Ellis, E., Heinimann, A., Hostert, P., Mertz, O., Grau, H. (2015). Land system science and sustainable development of the earth system: A global land project perspective. Anthropocene 12: 29-41.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zaburanna, L., Lutska, T., Tkachuk, V. (2020). Prospects and Challenges for Development of Small Business Forms in Agriculture of Ukraine. Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej / Problems of Agricultural Economics, 1(362): 44-59.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The Impact of the State of the Ecosystem on the Quality of Produced Organic Products in a Sustainable Development

Abstract

Paradigm

My account