Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Regional Variation in Jespersen’s Cycle in Early Middle English Cover

Regional Variation in Jespersen’s Cycle in Early Middle English

Open Access
|Dec 2017

References

  1. Allen, Cynthia. 1997. Middle English case loss and the ‘creolization’ hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics 1(1). 63–89. DOI: 10.1017/S136067430000036810.1017/S1360674300000368
  2. Bech, Kristin & George Walkden. 2016. English is (still) a West Germanic language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39(1). 65–100. DOI: 10.1017/S033258651500021910.1017/S0332586515000219
  3. Bradley, Henry. 1904. The making of English. London: Macmillan.
  4. Braunmüller, Kurt. 1996. Forms of language contact in the area of the Hanseatic League: Dialect contact phenomena and semicommunication. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 19(2). 141–154. DOI: 10.1017/S033258650000336X10.1017/S033258650000336X
  5. Braunmüller, Kurt. 2002. Language contact during the Old Nordic period I: Within the British Isles, Frisia and the Hanseatic League. In Oscar Bandle, Kurt Braunmüller, Ernst Håkon Jahr, Allan Karker, Hans-Peter Naumann & Ulf Teleman (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages, vol. 1, 1028–1039. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110197051-11410.1515/9783110197051-114
  6. Braunmüller, Kurt. 2007. Receptive multilingualism in Northern Europe in the Middle Ages: A description of a scenario. In Jan D. ten Thije & Ludger Zeevaert (eds.), Receptive multilingualism: Linguistic analyses, language policies and didactic concepts, 25–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/hsm.6.04bra10.1075/hsm.6.04bra
  7. Breitbarth, Anne. 2014. Dialect contact and the speed of Jespersen’s Cycle in Middle Low German. Taal en Tongval 66. 1–20. DOI: 10.5117/TET2014.1.BREI10.5117/TET2014.1.
  8. Brooks, N. P. 1979. England in the ninth century: The crucible of defeat. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 29. 1–20. DOI: 10.2307/367911010.2307/3679110
  9. Buccini, Anthony F. 1992. Southern Middle English hise and the question of pronominal transfer in language contact. In Rosina Lippi-Green (ed.), Recent developments in Germanic linguistics, 11–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.93.04buc10.1075/cilt.93.04buc
  10. Burchfield, Robert W. 1985. The English language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Coetsem, Frans, van. 1988. Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110884869
  12. Coetsem, Frans, van. 2000. A general and unified theory of the transmission process in language contact. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
  13. Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17(1–2). 79–106. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1979.17.1-2.7910.1515/ling.1979.17.1-2.79
  14. Dance, Richard. 2012. English in contact: Norse. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds.), English historical linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 2, 1724–1737. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110251609.172410.1515/9783110251609.1724
  15. Emonds, Joseph & Jan Terje Faarlund. 2014. English: The language of the Vikings. Olomouc: Palacký University Press.
  16. Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2002. Negation in C: The syntax of negated verbs in Old Norse. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 25(2). 190–224. DOI: 10.1080/03325860232109336410.1080/033258602321093364
  17. Fischer, Olga. 2013. The role of contact in English syntactic change in the Old and Middle English periods. In Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds.), English as a contact language, 19–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511740060.00210.1017/CBO9780511740060.002
  18. Frisch, Stefan. 1997. The change in negation in Middle English: A NEGP licensing account. Lingua 101(1–2). 21–64. DOI: 10.1016/S0024-3841(96)00018-610.1016/S0024-3841(96)00018-6
  19. Görlach, Manfred. 1986. Middle English – a creole? In Dieter Kastovsky & Aleksander Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries, 329–344. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110856132.32910.1515/9783110856132.329
  20. Hadley, Dawn. 1997. “And they proceeded to plough and to support themselves”: The Scandinavian settlement of England. Anglo-Norman England 19. 69–96.
  21. Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110871975
  22. Hogg, Richard M. 2004. The spread of negative contraction in early English. In Anne Curzan & Kimberley Emmons (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language II: Unfolding conversations, 459–482. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110897661.45910.1515/9783110897661.459
  23. Holman, Katherine. 2001. Defining the Danelaw. In James Graham-Campbell, Richard Hall, Judith Jesch & David N. Parsons (eds.), Vikings and the Danelaw: Select papers from the proceedings of the Thirteenth Viking Congress, 1–11. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
  24. Ingham, Richard. 2006. Negative concord and the loss of the negative particle ne in Late Middle English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 42. 77–97.
  25. Ingham, Richard. 2008. Contact with Scandinavian and Late Middle English negative concord. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 44. 121–137.
  26. Ingham, Richard. 2013. Negation in the history of English. In David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth (eds.), The history of negation in the languages of Europe and the Mediterranean. Vol. 1: Case studies, 119–150. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602537.003.000410.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602537.003.0004
  27. Iyeiri, Yoko. 1992. Negative constructions in selected Middle English verse texts. Ph.D. dissertation, University of St Andrews.
  28. Iyeiri, Yoko. 2001. Negative constructions in Middle English. Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press.
  29. Jack, George B. 1978. Negation in later Middle English prose. Archivum Linguisticum 9. 58–72.
  30. Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: A. F. Høst.
  31. Jespersen, Otto. 1938. Growth and structure of the English language. Oxford: Blackwell.
  32. Johannesson, Nils-Lennart. 2005. Old English versus Old Norse vocabulary in the Ormulum: The choice of third person plural personal pronouns. Ms., Stockholm University. https://www.orrmulum.net/ormproj/info/heore97_rev.pdf
  33. Kastovsky, Dieter. 2006. Vocabulary. In Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language, 199–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791154.005
  34. Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 2000. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English Prose. 2nd edition. https://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCME2-RELEASE-3/index.html
  35. Laing, Margaret. 1997. A fourteenth-century sermon on the number seven in Merton College, Oxford, MS 248. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 98(2). 99–134.
  36. Laing, Margaret. 2002. Corpus-provoked questions about negation in early Middle English. Language Sciences 24(3–4). 297–321. DOI: 10.1016/S0388-0001(01)00035-310.1016/S0388-0001(01)00035-3
  37. Laing, Margaret. 2013–. A linguistic atlas of Early Middle English. Version 3.2. https://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme2/laeme2_framesZ.html
  38. Laing, Margaret & Roger Lass. 2008–. A linguistic atlas of Early Middle English. Introduction. https://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme2/laeme_intro_ch4.html
  39. Leslie, Stephen, Bruce Winney, Garrett Hellenthal, Dan Davison, Abdelhamid Boumertit, Tammy Day, Katarzyna Hutnik, Ellen C. Royrvik, Barry Cunliffe, Wellcome Trust Case Consortium 2, International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium, Daniel J. Lawson, Daniel Fallush, Colin Freeman, Matti Pirinen, Simon Myers, Mark Robinson, Peter Donnelly & Walter Bodmer. 2015. The fine-scale genetic structure of the British population. Nature 519. 309–314. DOI: 10.1038/nature1423010.1038/14230
  40. Levin, Samuel R. 1958. Negative contraction: An Old and Middle English dialect criterion. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 57(3). 492–501.
  41. Loyn, Henry R. 1977. The Vikings in Britain. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  42. Lucas, Christopher. 2009. The development of negation in Arabic and Afro-Asiatic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
  43. Lucas, Christopher. 2012. Contact-induced grammatical change: Towards an explicit account. Diachronica 29(3). 275–300. DOI: 10.1075/dia.29.3.01luc10.1075/dia.29.3.01luc
  44. Lucas, Christopher. 2014. Contact-induced language change. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 519–536. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315794013.ch2410.4324/9781315794013.ch24
  45. Lutz, Angelika. 2012. Norse influence on English in the light of general contact linguistics. In Irén Hegedűs & Alexandra Fodor (eds.), English historical linguistics 2010: Selected papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 23–27 August 2010, 15–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.325.01lut10.1075/cilt.325.01lut
  46. Lutz, Angelika. 2013. Language contact and prestige. Anglia 131(4). 562–590. DOI: 10.1515/anglia-2013-006510.1515/anglia-2013-0065
  47. McIntosh, Angus, Michael L. Samuels & Michael Benskin. 1986. A linguistic atlas of Late Mediaeval English. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
  48. McWhorter, John. 2002. What happened to English? Diachronica 19(2). 217–272. DOI: 10.1075/dia.19.2.02wha10.1075/dia.19.2.02wha
  49. Miller, D. Gary. 2012. External influences on English: From its beginnings to the Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654260.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654260.001.0001
  50. Mitchell, Bruce. 1994. The Englishness of Old English. In Malcolm Godden, Douglas Gray & Terry Hoad (eds.), From Anglo-Saxon to Early Middle English: Studies presented to E. G. Stanley, 163–181. Oxford: Clarendon.10.1093/oso/9780198117766.003.0008
  51. Peters, Hans. 1981. Zum skandinavischen Lehngut im Altenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 6. 85–124.
  52. Pons-Sanz, Sara. 2007. Norse-derived vocabulary in late Old English texts: Wulfstan’s works, a case study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/nss.2210.1075/nss.22
  53. Pons-Sanz, Sara. 2013. The lexical effects of Anglo-Scandinavian linguistic contact on Old English. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.SEM-EB.5.106260
  54. Poussa, Patricia. 1982. The evolution of Early Standard English: The creolization hypothesis. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 14. 69–85.
  55. Sawyer, Peter H. 1971. The age of the Vikings. (2nd edn.) London: Arnold.
  56. Smits, Caroline. 1998. Two models for the study of language contact: A psycho-linguistic perspective versus a socio-cultural perspective. In Monika S. Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin & Dieter Stein (eds.), Historical linguistics, 1997: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Düsseldorf, 10–17 August 1997, 377–391. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.164.24smi10.1075/cilt.164.24smi
  57. Studer-Joho, Nicole. 2014. Diffusion and change in Early Middle English: Methodological and theoretical implications from the LAEME corpus of tagged texts. Tübingen: Francke Verlag.
  58. Sykes, Bryan. 2006. Blood of the Isles: Exploring the genetic roots of our tribal history. London: Bantam.
  59. Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520912793
  60. Townend, Matthew. 2002. Language and history in Viking Age England: Linguistic relations between speakers of Old Norse and Old English. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.SEM-EB.5.106296
  61. Trips, Carola. 2002. From OV to VO in Early Middle English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/la.6010.1075/la.60
  62. Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  63. Van Bergen, Linda. 2008. Negative contraction and Old English dialects: Evidence from glosses and prose. Part I. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 109(3). 275–312.
  64. Wallage, Phillip. 2005. Negation in early English: Parametric variation and grammatical competition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of York.
  65. Wallage, Phillip. 2008. Jespersen’s Cycle in Middle English: Parametric variation and grammatical competition. Lingua 118(5). 643–674. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.00110.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.001
  66. Wallage, Phillip. 2013. Functional differentiation and grammatical competition in the English Jespersen Cycle. Journal of Historical Syntax 2(1). 1–25.
  67. Winford, Donald. 2003. An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  68. Winford, Donald. 2005. Contact-induced changes: Classification and processes. Diachronica 22(2). 373–427. DOI: 10.1075/dia.22.2.05win10.1075/dia.22.2.05win
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/stap-2017-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2082-5102 | Journal ISSN: 0081-6272
Language: English
Page range: 173 - 201
Published on: Dec 29, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 George Walkden, Donald Alasdair Morrison, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.