References
- Ahearn, Laura M. 2001. Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30. 109–137. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.10910.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
- Alderson, J. Charles. 1991. Bands and scores. In J. Charles Alderson & Brian North (eds.), Language testing in the 1990s: The communicative legacy, 71–86. London: Modern English Publications/British Council.
- Alderson, J. Charles, Neus Figueras, Henk Kuijper, Guenter Nold, Sauli Takala & Claire Tardieu. 2004. The development of specifications for item development and classification within the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment: Reading and listening: Final report of the Dutch CEF Construct Project. Lancaster University. http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/44/1/final_report.pdf.
- Bachman, Lyle F. 1990. Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Banerjee, Jayanti, Xun Yan, Mark Chapman & Heather Elliott. 2015. Keeping up with the times: Revising and refreshing a rating scale. Assessing Writing 26. 5–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.00110.1016/j.asw.2015.07.001
- Becker, Anthony. 2010. Examining rubrics used to measure writing performance in US intensive English programs. The CATESOL Journal 22(1). 113–130.
- Billig, Michael. 2008. The language of critical discourse analysis: The case of nominalization. Discourse & Society 19(6). 783–800. DOI: 10.1177/095792650809589410.1177/0957926508095894
- Brindley, Geoff. 1998. Describing language development? Rating scales and SLA. In Lyle F. Bachman & Andrew D. Cohen (eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research, 112–140. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5). 585–614. DOI: 10.1177/146144560505440710.1177/1461445605054407
- Calkins, Lucy McCormick. 1994. The art of teaching writing (new ed.). Portsmouth: Heinemann.
- Chakroff, Aleksandr, Kyle A. Thomas, Omar S. Haque & Liane Young. 2015. An indecent proposal: The dual functions of indirect speech. Cognitive Science 39(1). 199–211. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.1214510.1111/cogs.12145
- Cotton, Fiona & Kate Wilson. 2011. An investigation of examiner rating of coherence and cohesion in the IELTS Academic Writing Task 2. https://www.ielts.org/-/media/research-reports/ielts_rr_volume12_report6.ashx
- Covill, Amy E. 2012. College students’ use of a writing rubric: Effect on quality of writing, self-efficacy, and writing practices. Journal of Writing Assessment 5(1). http://journalofwritingassessment.org/article.php?article=60
- Crusan, Deborah. 2010. Assessment in the second language writing classroom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Davies, Alan. 2008. Assessing academic English. Testing English proficiency 1950–89: The IELTS solution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619.
- Dryer, Dylan. 2013. Scaling writing ability: A corpus-driven inquiry. Written Communication 30(1). 3–35. DOI: 10.1177/074108831246699210.1177/0741088312466992
- Duranti, Alessandro. 2004. Agency in language. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 451–473. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9780470996522.ch2010.1002/9780470996522.ch20
- Ehrlich, Susan. 2001. Representing rape: Language and sexual consent. New York: Routledge.
- Fausey, Caitlin M. & Lera Boroditsky. 2010. Subtle linguistic cues influence perceived blame and financial liability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17(5). 644–650. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.64410.3758/PBR.17.5.644
- Fausey, Caitlin M., Bria L. Long, Aya Inamori & Lera Boroditsky. 2010. Constructing agency: The role of language. Frontiers in Psychology 1. 162. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.0016210.3389/fpsyg.2010.00162
- Fillmore, Charles J. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 280. 20–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x
- Fillmore, Charles J. & Collin Baker. 2010. A frames approach to semantic analysis. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 313–339. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.001310.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0013
- Fowler, Roger, Bob Hodge, Günther Kress & Tony Trew. 1979. Language and control. London: Routledge.
- Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.
- Fox, Janna D. 2007. Language testing reconsidered. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
- Golder, Katherine, Kenneth Reeder & Sarah Fleming. 2012. Determination of appropriate IELTS Writing and Speaking Band Scores for admission into two programs at a Canadian post-secondary polytechnic institution. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée 14(1). 222–250.
- Hambleton, Ronald K.& Mary Pitoniak. 2006. Setting performance standards. In Robert L. Brennan (ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.), 433–470. Westport, CT: Praeger.
- Hawkey, Roger & Fiona Barker. 2004. Developing a common scale for the assessment of writing. Assessing Writing 9(2). 122–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2004.06.00110.1016/j.asw.2004.06.001
- Henley, Nancy M., Michelle Miller & Jo Anne Beazley. 1995. Syntax, semantics, and sexual violence: Agency and the passive voice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14(1–2). 60–84. DOI: 10.1177/0261927X9514100410.1177/0261927X95141004
- Jeffery, Jill V. 2009. Constructs of writing proficiency in US state and national writing assessments: Exploring variability. Assessing Writing 14(1). 3–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.00210.1016/j.asw.2008.12.002
- Knoch, Ute. 2007. ‘Little coherence, considerable strain for reader’: A comparison between two rating scales for the assessment of coherence. Assessing Writing 12(2). 108–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2007.07.00210.1016/j.asw.2007.07.002
- Knoch, Ute. 2009. Diagnostic assessment of writing: A comparison of two rating scales. Language Testing 26(2). 275–304. DOI: 10.1177/026553220810100810.1177/0265532208101008
- Knoch, Ute. 2011. Rating scales for diagnostic assessment of writing: What should they look like and where should the criteria come from? Assessing Writing 16(2). 81–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2011.02.00310.1016/j.asw.2011.02.003
- Knoch, Ute, Susy Macqueen & Sally O'Hagan. 2014. An investigation of the effect of task type on the discourse produced by students at various score levels in the TOEFL iBT® writing test. ETS Research Report Series 2014(2). DOI: 10.1002/ets2.1203810.1002/ets2.12038
- Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder. 2014. Raters’ decisions, rating procedures and rating scales. Language Testing. 31(3). 279–284. DOI: 10.1177/026553221452617910.1177/0265532214526179
- LaFrance, Marianne & Eugene Hahn. 1994. The disappearing agent: Gender stereotypes, interpersonal verbs and implicit causality. In Camille Roman, Suzanne Juhasz & Cristianne Miller (eds.), The women and language debate: A sourcebook, 348–362. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Li, Jinrong & Peggy Lindsey. 2015. Understanding variations between student and teacher application of rubrics. Assessing Writing 26. 67–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.00310.1016/j.asw.2015.07.003
- Lumley, Tom. 2002. Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: What do they really mean to the raters? Language Testing 19(3). 246–276. DOI:10.1191/0265532202lt230oa10.1191/0265532202lt230oa
- Matsuda, Paul Kei, & Jill V. Jeffery. 2012. Voice in student essays. In Ken Hyland & Carmen Sancho Guinda (eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres, 151–165. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137030825_1010.1057/9781137030825_10
- Messick, Samuel. 1988. Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. ETS Research Report Series 1988(2). DOI:10.1002/j.2330-8516.1988.tb00303.x10.1002/j.2330-8516.1988.tb00303.x
- Morales, Meghan Corella & Jin Sook Lee. 2015. Stories of assessment: Spanish–English bilingual children's agency and interactional competence in oral language assessments. Linguistics and Education 29. 32–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2014.10.00810.1016/j.linged.2014.10.008
- North, Brian. 2007. The CEFR illustrative descriptor scales. The Modern Language Journal 91(4). 656–659. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_3.x10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_3.x
- North, Brian& Günther Schneider. 1998. Scaling descriptors for language proficiency scales. Language Testing 15(2). 217–262. DOI: 10.1177/02655322980150020410.1177/026553229801500204
- [OED =] Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com/
- Schaefer, Edward. 2008. Rater bias patterns in an EFL writing assessment. Language Testing 25(4). 465–493. DOI: 10.1177/026553220809427310.1177/0265532208094273
- Spandel, Vicki. 2006. In defense of rubrics. English Journal 96(1). 19–22.
- Upshur, John A. & Carolyn E. Turner. 1995. Constructing rating scales for second language tests. ELT Journal49(1). 3–12. DOI: 10.1093/elt/49.1.310.1093/elt/49.1.3
- Winke, Paula & Hyojung Lim. 2015. ESL essay raters’ cognitive processes in applying the Jacobs et al. rubric: An eye-movement study. Assessing Writing 25. 38–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2015.05.00210.1016/j.asw.2015.05.002
- Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer (eds.). 2009. Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.