Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Features of Informality in Applied Linguistics Research Articles Published in Iranian Local Journals Cover

Features of Informality in Applied Linguistics Research Articles Published in Iranian Local Journals

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Fine, J., & Shimoni, A. R. 2003. Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text, 23(3), 321-346.10.1515/text.2003.014
  2. Bell, D. M. 2007. Sentence-initial and and but in academic writing. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 17(2), 183-201.10.1075/prag.17.2.01bel
  3. Chang, Y.-Y., & Swales, J. 1999. Informal elements in English academic writing: Threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers? In C. Candlin, & K. Hyland (eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices London: Longman.
  4. Cobb, T. 2003. Analyzing late interlanguage with learner corpora: Quebec replications of three European studies. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(3), 393-424.10.3138/cmlr.59.3.393
  5. Flowerdew, J. 2006. Use of signalling nouns in a learner corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 345-362.10.1075/ijcl.11.3.07flo
  6. Geisler, C., D. S. Kaufer, and E. R. Steinberg. 1985. The Unattended Anaphoric “This”: When Should Writers Use it? Written Communication.2: 129–155.10.1177/0741088385002002002
  7. Ghaemi, F., & Sabadoust, G. 2017. Interactive and Interactional Markers in ISI and Non-ISI Applied Linguistic Journal Articles Written by Iranian Authors: A Contrastive Meta-Discourse Analysis of Method Section. Journal of Recent Research in English Language Studies, 4(1), 89-108.
  8. Gilquin, G. & Paquot, M. 2008. Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction 1 (1), 41-61.10.1075/etc.1.1.05gil
  9. Granger, S., & Rayson, P. 1998. Automatic profiling of learner texts. Learner English on computer, 119-131.10.4324/9781315841342-9
  10. Gray, B. 2010. On the use of demonstrative pronouns and determiners as cohesive devices: A focus on sentence-initial this/these in academic prose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 167-183.10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.003
  11. Heylighen, F., & Dewaele, J.-M. 1999. Formality of language: Definition, measurement and behavioral determinants. Internal Report. Center “Leo Apostel”, Free University of Brussels.
  12. Hyland, K. 2001. Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for specific purposes, 20(3), 207-226.10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
  13. Hyland, K. 2001. Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles. Written communication, 18(4), 549-574.10.1177/0741088301018004005
  14. Hyland, K. 2002. What do they mean? Questions in academic writing. Text, 22(4), 529-558.10.1515/text.2002.021
  15. Hyland, K. 2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?. Journal of pragmatics, 113, 16-29.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
  16. Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. 2017. Is academic writing becoming more informal?. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 40-51.10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001
  17. Kuo, C. H. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for specific purposes, 18(2), 121-138.10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6
  18. Leedham, M. 2015. Chinese students’ writing in English: Implications from a corpus-driven study. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9780203797488
  19. McCrostie, J. 2008. Writer visibility in EFL learner academic writing: A corpus-based study. ICAME journal, 32(1), 97-114.
  20. Mur-Dueñas, P. 2017. Self-reference in research articles across Europe and Asia: a review of studies. Brno studies in English, 42(1).10.5817/BSE2016-1-4
  21. Simkins-Bullock, J. A. and Wildman, B. G. 1991. An investigation into the relationship between gender and language. Sex Roles 24: 149–160.10.1007/BF00288888
  22. Swales, J. M. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524827
  23. Strauss, S. 1993. Why ‘this’ and ‘that’ are not complete without ‘it’. In K. Beals, G. Cooke, D. Kathman, S. Kita, K. McCullogh, & D. Testen (Eds.), CLS 29: Proceedings of the 29th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 403-417). Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
  24. Swales, J. M. 2005. Attended and unattended “this” in academic writing: A long and unfinished story. ESP Malaysia, 11(1), 1-15.
  25. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. 2012. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.2173936
  26. Steinberg, E., Kaufer, D., & Geisler, C. 1998. Response to Leonard Moskovit, “When is broad reference clear?” College Composition and Communication, 35, 478e486.10.2307/357801
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rjes-2019-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2286-0428 | Journal ISSN: 1584-3734
Language: English
Page range: 135 - 143
Published on: Dec 5, 2019
Published by: West University of Timisoara
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Seyed Foad Ebrahimi, Seyed Aqil Fakheri, published by West University of Timisoara
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.