Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Blended synchronous learning environment: Student perspectives Cover

Blended synchronous learning environment: Student perspectives

Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradelevel.pdf
  2. Arbaugh, J. B. & Hwang, A. (2006). Does “teaching presence” exist in online MBA courses? The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 9-21.10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.12.001
  3. Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1-17.10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006
  4. Cunningham, U. (2014). Teaching the disembodied: Othering and activity systems in a blended synchronous learning situation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6).10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1793
  5. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. Handbook of distance education, 1, 113-127.
  6. Hastie, M., Hung, I. C., Chen, N. S., & Kinshuk. (2010). A blended synchronous learning model for educational international collaboration. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 9e24.10.1080/14703290903525812
  7. Moore, M. G. (1993). 2 Theory of transactional distance. Theoretical principles of distance education, 22.
  8. National Center for Education Statistics (2014). STEM in Postsecondary Education (US Department of Education, Washington).
  9. New Media Consortium., & Consortium for School Networking. (2017). Horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Corsortium.
  10. Oyarzun, B., & Martin, F. (2013). A Case Study on Multi-Modal Course Delivery and Social Learning Opportunities. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 15(1), 25.
  11. Pollard, H., Minor, M., & Swanson, A. (2014). Instructor Social Presence within the Community of Inquiry Framework and Its Impact on Classroom Community and the Learning Environment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 17(2), n2.
  12. Richardson, J. & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
  13. Rasmussen, R. C. (2003). The quantity and quality of human interaction in a synchronous blended learning environment. (Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University) Available from ProQuest Dissertations & theses. (UMI No. 305345928)
  14. Szeto, E. (2015). Community of inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? Computers & Education, 81, 191-201.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.015
  15. Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. (2014). Towards a framework of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: what effects are there on students' social presence experience? Interactive Learning Environments, 2, 1-17.
  16. Teng, D. C. E., Chen, N. S., & Leo, T. (2012). Exploring students’ learning experience in an international online research seminar in the Synchronous Cyber Classroom. Computers & Education, 58(3), 918-930.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rem-2017-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2037-0849 | Journal ISSN: 2037-0830
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 23
Published on: Oct 10, 2017
Published by: SIREM (Società Italiana di Ricerca sull’Educazione Mediale)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Sheri Conklina, Beth Oyarzun, Daisyane Barreto, published by SIREM (Società Italiana di Ricerca sull’Educazione Mediale)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.