Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Does Grade Level Matter for the Assessment of Business Process Management Maturity? Cover

Does Grade Level Matter for the Assessment of Business Process Management Maturity?

Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy
Volume 62 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2016
References

References

  1. 1. BOC. (2007). Process management life cycle (PMLC), BOC information system GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.bocpmmc.com/docs/BOC_PMLC_folder_web_de.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Dobrzyński, M., Dziekoński, K., & Jurczuk, A. (2012). A diagnosis of process maturity in a business cluster initiative. Contemporary Management Quarterly, 3, 41-50.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Gibson, D. L., Goldenson, D. R., & Kost, K. (2006). Performance results of CMMI-based process improvement. Technical Report CMU/ SEI-2006-004 (pp. 5-6).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., & Reichert, M. (2008). Managing process variants in the process life cycle. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), Barcelona (pp. 154-161).
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Hammer, M. (2007). The process audit. Harvard Business Review, 85(4), 111-123.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Harmon, P. (2007). Business process change: A guide for business managers and BPM and Six Sigma professionals. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-374152-3.50072-0
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Houy, C., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2010). Empirical research in business process management-analysis of an emerging field of research. Business Process Management Journal, 16(4), 619-661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637151011065946
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Humphrey, W. S. (1988). Characterizing the software process: a maturity framework. Software, 5(2), 73-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/52.2014
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Jost, W., & Scheer, A. W. (2002). Business process management: a core task for any company organization. In A. W. Scheer, M. Kirchmer & W. Jost (Eds.), Business process excellence: Aris in practice (pp. 33-43). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24705-0_3
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Jurczuk, A., & Gabryelczyk, R. (2015). Cele doskonalenia przedsiębiorstw w kontekście dojrzałości procesowej. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 83(1941), 245-254.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Kalinowski, T. B. (2011). Modele oceny dojrzałości procesów. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Oeconomica, 258, 173-187.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Kohlbacher, M. (2010). The effects of process orientation: a literature review. Business Process Management Journal, 16(1), 135-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637151011017985
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Kohlbacher, M., & Reijers, H. A. (2013). The effects of process-oriented organizational design on firm performance. Business Process Management Journal, 19(2), 245-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637151311308303
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Lockamy, A., & McCormack, K. (2004). Development of a chain management process maturity model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(4), 272-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598540410550019
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Macedo de Morais, R., Kazan, S., Inês Dallavalle de Pádua, S., & Lucirton Costa, A. (2014). An analysis of BPM lifecycles: from a literature review to a framework proposal. Business Process Management Journal, 20(3), 412-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2013-0035
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. McCormack, K. P., & Johnson, W. C. (2001). Business process orientation. Gaining the e-business competitive advantage. New York: St. Lucie Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420025569
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Netjes, M., Reijers, H., & Van der Aalst, W. P. (2006). Supporting the BPM life-cycle with FileNet. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD), Namur University, Namur (pp. 497-508).
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Nosowski, A. (2010). Zarządzanie procesami w instytucjach finansowych. Warszawa: CH Beck.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. OMG. (2008). Business process maturity model (BPMM), version 1.0, object management group (Document Number: formal/2008-06-01). Retrieved from http://www.omg.org
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Rosemann, M., & de Bruin, T. (2005). Towards a Business Process Management Maturity Model. Proceedings of the thirteenth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Regensburg, Paper 37.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2005/37
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Rosemann, M., de Bruin, T., & Power, B. (2006). BPM maturity. In J. Jeston & J. Nelis (Eds.), Business process management: Practical guidelines to successful implementations (pp. 313-329). Burlington: Elsevier.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Roztocki, N., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2015). Information and communication technology in transition economies: An assessment of research trends. Information Technology for Development, 21(3), 330-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2014.891498
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Röglinger, M., Poppelbuss, J., & Becker, J. (2012). Maturity models in business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 18(2), 328-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637151211225225
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. SEI. (2006). Appraisal requirements for CMMI, version 1.2 (ARC, V1.2). Technical Report CMU/SEI-2006-TR-011 ESC-TR-2006-011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 27. Van der Aalst, W. M. (2004). Business process management: a personal view. Business Process Management Journal, 10(2), 248-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/bpmj.2004.15710baa.001
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. 28. Verma, N. (2009). Business process management: Profiting from process. New Delhi: Global India.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 29. Wayne, S. J., & Linden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 232-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256734
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. 30. Weske, M. (2007). Business process management: Concepts, languages, architectures. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 31. Zur Muehlen, M. & Ho, D. T. Y. (2006). Risk management in the BPM life cycle. In Business process management workshops (pp. 454-466). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11678564_42
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. 32. Zwicker, J., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2010). Business process maturity in public administrations. In J. vom Brocke & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Handbook on business process management 2 (pp. 369-396). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01982-1_18
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ngoe-2016-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2385-8052 | Journal ISSN: 0547-3101
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 11
Submitted on: Nov 1, 2015
Accepted on: Mar 1, 2016
Published on: Jun 24, 2016
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
business process management,
maturity of business process management,
maturity models,
grade levels in the maturity assessment
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Economic policy,
Business management,
Management, organization, corporate governance,
Mathematics and statistics for economists,
Statistics

© 2016 Renata Gabryelczyk, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 62 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
Next article