Proposed Use of Monte Carlo Simulated Images to Evaluate the Accuracy of Measurements on X-Ray Computed Tomography

Kowaluk, Tomasz; Maciak, Maciej; Woźniak, Adam; Tulik, Piotr; Golnik, Natalia

doi:10.1515/msr-2018-0034

References

[1] Maire, E., Withers, P.J. (2014). Quantitative X-ray tomography. International Materials Reviews, 59 (1), 1-43.10.1179/1743280413Y.0000000023
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] Kruth, J.P., Bartscher, M., Carmignato, S., Schmitt, R., De Chiffre, L., Weckenmann, A. (2011). Computed tomography for dimensional metrology. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 60 (2), 821-842.10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] De Chiffre, L., Carmignato, S., Kruth, J.P., Schmitt, R., Weckenmann, A. (2014). Industrial applications of computed tomography. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 63, 655-677.10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] Villarraga-Gómez, H. (2016). X-ray computed tomography for dimensional measurements. In Digital Imaging 2016: ASNT Topical Conference, Mashantucket, CT, USA. American Society for Nondestructive Testing, 44-57.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] Villarraga-Gómez, H. (2016). Seeing is believing: Xray computed tomography for quality control. Quality Magazine, 55 (6), 20-23.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] Villarraga-Gómez, H., Lee, C., Corbett, T., Tarbutton, J.A., Smith, S.T. (2015). Assessing additive manufacturing processes with X-ray CT metrology. In ASPE Spring Topical Meeting, Raleigh, NC, USA. Vol. 60, 116-120.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] Gapinski, B., Wieczorowski, M., Marciniak-Podsadna, L., Dybala, B., Ziolkowski, G. (2013). Comparison of different method of measurement geometry using CMM, optical scanner and computed tomography 3D. In 24th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] Hermanek, P., Carmignato, S. (2016). Reference object for evaluating the accuracy of porosity measurements by X-ray computed tomography. Case Studies in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 6, 122-127.10.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] Kiekens, K., Welkenhuyzen, F., Tan, Y., Bleys, P., Voet, A., Kruth, J.-P., Dewulf, W. (2011). A test object with parallel grooves for calibration and accuracy assessment of industrial computed tomography (CT) metrology. Measurement Science and Technology, 22 (11), 115502.10.1088/0957-0233/22/11/115502
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] Obrist, A., Flisch, A., Hofmann, J. (2004). Point cloud reconstruction with sub-pixel accuracy by sliceadaptive thresholding of X-ray computed tomography images. NDT & E International, 37, 373-380.10.1016/j.ndteint.2003.11.002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] Kowaluk, T., Wozniak, A. (2017). A new threshold selection method for X-ray computed tomography for dimensional metrology. Precision Engineering, 50, 449-454.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.06.020
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] Battistoni, G., Muraro, S., Sala, P.R., Cerutti, F., Ferrari, A., Roesler, S., Fasso, A., Ranft, J. (2007). The FLUKA code: Description and benchmarking. In AIP Conference Proceedings of the Hadronic Shower Simulation Workshop 2006, 6-8 September 2006. AIP, Vol. 896, 31-49.10.1063/1.2720455
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] Böhlen, T.T., Cerutti, F., Chin, M.P.W., Fassò, A., Ferrari, A., Ortega, P.G., Mairani, A., Sala, P.R., Smirnov, G., Vlachoudis, V. (2014). The FLUKA Code: Developments and challenges for high energy and medical applications. Nuclear Data Sheets, 120, 211-214.10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.049
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. 130 kV Microfocus X-Ray Source, L9181-02. Instruction Manual. https://www.hamamatsu.com/resources/pdf/etd/L9181-02_TXPR1015E.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] Berdondinia, A., Bettuzzia, M., Bianconia, D., Brancaccioa, R. (2007). Monte Carlo optimization of an industrial tomography system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 580, 771-773.10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.104
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] Sladek, J., Gaska, A. (2012). Evaluation of coordinate measurement uncertainty with use of virtual machine model based on Monte Carlo method. In Measurement, 45 (6), 1564-1575.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] Hiller, J., Reindl, L. (2012). A computer simulation platform for the estimation of measurement uncertainties in dimensional X-ray computed tomography. Measurement, 45 (8), 2166-2182.10.1016/j.measurement.2012.05.030
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[18] Miceli, A., Thierrya, R., Flischa, A., Sennhausera, U., Casalib, F., Simonc, M. (2007). Monte Carlo simulations of a high-resolution X-ray CT system for industrial applications. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 583, 313-323.10.1016/j.nima.2007.09.012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[19] Chyba, B., Mantler, M., Reiter, M. (2008). Monte Carlo simulation of projections in computed tomography powder diffraction. Powder Diffraction, 23 (2), 150-153.10.1154/1.2919045
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[20] Vlachoudis, V. (2009). FLAIR: A powerful but user friendly graphical interface for FLUKA. In International Conference on Mathematics, Computational Methods & Reactor Physics (M&C 2009), Saratoga Springs, New York, 3-7 May 2009. American Nuclear Society.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Proposed Use of Monte Carlo Simulated Images to Evaluate the Accuracy of Measurements on X-Ray Computed Tomography

References

Paradigm

My account