The Problems of the Assessment of Corporate Social Responsibility in the International Context

Skruibytė, Izolda

doi:10.1515/mosr-2020-0006

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a social phenomenon is very dynamic, multidimensional and complex. The content of CSR constantly expands and covers more aspects and, therefore, its evaluation becomes more complicated also. The comparative analysis of different CSR assessment methods has been conducted in this article seeking to reveal the main problems when assessing CSR in an international context.

References

1. Adnan, S. M., Staden, C., Hay, D. (2010). Do Culture and Governance Structure Influence CSR Reporting Quality: Evidence from China, India, Malaysia and the United Kingdom. – Paper presented at sixth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, Sydney.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Adnan, S. M., Hay, D., Staden, Ch. (2018). The Influence of Culture and Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Cross Country Analysis // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 198, pp. 820–832. doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.05710.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.057
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Aiginger, K., Vogel, J. (2015). Competitiveness: From a Misleading Concept to a Strategy Supporting Beyond GDP Goals // Competitiveness Review. Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 497–523. doi.org/10.1108/CR-06-2015-005210.1108/CR-06-2015-0052
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Albinger, H., Freeman, S. (2000). Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 243–253. doi: 10.1023/A:100628981794110.1023/A:1006289817941
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Arshad, R., Othman, S., Othman, R. (2012). Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Reputation and Performance // International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering. Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 643–647. scholar.waset.org/1999.10/10239
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Basil, D. Z., Erlandson, J. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility Website Representations: A Longitudinal Study of Internal and External Self-Presentations // Journal of Marketing Communications. Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 125–137. doi: 10.1080/1352726070185849710.1080/13527260701858497
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Bernatonyte, D., Vilke, R., Keizeriene, E. (2009). Ekonominės krizės poveikio Lietuvos smulkių ir vidutinių įmonių socialinei atsakomybei kryptys // Ekonomika ir vadyba. Vol. 14, pp. 229–236. ISSN 1822-6515
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Bhatia, A., Makkar, B. (2019). CSR Disclosure in Developing and Developed Countries: A Comparative Study // Journal of Global Responsibility. Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 1–26. doi. org/10.1108/JGR-04-2019-004310.1108/JGR-04-2019-0043
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Bogetic, S., Dordevic, D., Cockalo, D., Vorkapic, M. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Factor of Global Competitiveness // Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 11–19. UDC: 005.35:339.137.210.5937/jemc1801011B
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Bouten, L., Cho, C. H., Michelon G., Roberts R. W. (2017). CSR Performance Proxies in Large-Sample Studies: “Umbrella Advocates”, Construct Clarity, and the “Validity Police”. Internet access: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3107182. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.310718210.2139/ssrn.3107182
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Bowen, G. A. (2005). Preparing a Qualitative Research-Based Dissertation: Lessons Learned // The Qualitative Report. Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 208–222. Internet access: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR10-2/bowen.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Bryman, A. (2001). Social Research Methods. – Oxford: Oxford university press. 540 p.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Brock, V. F., Gavronski, I. (2013). Does the Institutional Context Shape International Operations Strategy? Country-Level Analysis // Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management. Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 106–121.10.12660/joscmv6n1p106-121
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Carrol, A. B., Buchholtz, A. K. (2015). Business & Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. – 7th ed. South-Western Cengage Learning, p. 768.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders // Business Horizons. Vol. 34, No. 4, p. 39–48. doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Chaple, W., Moon, J. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting // Business & Societies. Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 415–441, doi: 10.1177/000765030528165810.1177/0007650305281658
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Dahlsrud, A. (2006). How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions // Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. p. 1–14, doi: 10.1002/csr.13210.1002/csr.132
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Dagilienė, L., Bruneckienė, J. (2010). Savanoriškai atskleidžiamos informacijos vaidmuo įmonių socialinės atsakomybės aspektu // Ekonomika ir vadyba. Vol. 15, pp. 451–456.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Drūteikenė, G. Seiliūtė, J. (2009). The Stand of Social Responsibility within the Strategy of Business Organization // Ekonomika. Vol. 88, pp. 130–143.10.15388/Ekon.2009.0.1031
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Eberle, D., Berens, G., Li, T. (2013). The Impact of Interactive Corporate Social Responsibility Communication on Corporate Reputation // Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 118, pp. 731–746. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1957-y10.1007/s10551-013-1957-y
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Ehsan, S., Nazir, M. S., Nurunnabi, M., Khan, Q. R., Tahir, S., Ahmed, I. (2018). A Multimethod Approach to Assess and Measure Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Practices in a Developing Economy // Sustainability. Vol. 10, pp. 1–18. doi:10.3390/su1008295510.3390/su10082955
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Erlingsson, Ch., Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A Hands-On Guide to Doing Content Analysis // African Journal of Emergency Medicine. Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.00110.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. European Commission. (2011). A Renewed EU Strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. – Brussels: European Commission. COM (2011) 681.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Everaert, P., Bouten, L., Liedekerke, L., De Moor, L., Christiaens, J. (2009). Discovering Patterns in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reporting: A Transparent Framework Based on the Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. – Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 09/557.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Ezeala-Harrison, F. (2014). Relative Impacts of Quantitative and Qualitative Indicators of International Competitiveness // Journal of International Business and Economics. Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 1–16. doi: 10.15640/jibe.v2n4a110.15640/jibe.v2n4a1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Forte, A. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility in The United States and Europe: How Important Is It? The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility // International Business & Economics Research Journal. Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 815–824. doi: 10.19030/iber.v12i7.797010.19030/iber.v12i7.7970
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Gallen, M., Peraita, C. (2018). The Effects of National Culture on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Cross-Country Comparison // Applied Economics. Vol. 50, No. 27, pp. 2967–2979. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2017.141208210.1080/00036846.2017.1412082
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Geva, A. (2008). Three Models of Corporate Social Responsibility: Interrelationships between Theory, Research, and Practice // Business and Society. Vol. 113, No. 1, pp. 1–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8594.2008.00311.x10.1111/j.1467-8594.2008.00311.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Gyves, S., O’Higgins, E. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Avenue for Sustainable Benefit for Society and the Firm? // Society and Business Review. Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 207–223. doi: 10.1108/1746568081090729710.1108/17465680810907297
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Golinski M., Szafranski, M. (2019). Application of Corporate Social Responsibility for Competency Management. Case Study, pp. 3–18. / In Corporate Social Responsibility in the Manufacturing and Services Sectors. (2019). Ed. P. Golinska-Dawson, M. Spychala – Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, p. 279. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33851-9_110.1007/978-3-642-33851-9_1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Gomes, C. M., Kruglianskas, I., Scherer, F., Luz Neto, R., Menezes, U. G. (2011). Management Practices Committed to Sustainability and Its Relationship with Business Performance. – POMS 22nd Annual Conference Reno, Nevada, EUA April 29 to May 2, 2011.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Gratton, C., Jones, I. (2004.) Research Methods for Sports Studies. – Routledge, London and New York, p. 288.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Gruževskis, B., Vasiljevienė, N., Moskvina, J., Kleinaitė, I. (2006). Aktualūs socialinės politikos klausimai. – 2006/7. Darbo ir socialinių tyrimų institutas, Socialinės apsaugos ir darbo ministerija, LR trišalė taryba, p. 40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Habek, P., Wolniak, R. (2016). Assessing the Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: The Case of Reporting Practices in Selected European Union Member States // Quality and Quantity. Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 399–420. doi: 10.1007/s11135-014-0155-z10.1007/s11135-014-0155-z
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Haider, M. B. (2010). An Overview of Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting (CSER) in Developing Countries // Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting. Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 3–17. doi: 10.22164/isea.v4i1.4410.22164/isea.v4i1.44
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Hamidu, A. A., Haron, H., Amran, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review on Definitions, Core Characteristics and Theoretical Perspectives // Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 83–95. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p8310.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p83
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. Hino, K. (2006). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Empirical Study on a Japanese Company. – IFSAM VIIIth World Congress, September 28–30 Berlin, Germany.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. Hooks, J., Staden, C. J. (2011). Evaluating Environmental Disclosures: The Relationship between Quality and Extent Measures // British Accounting Review. Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 200–213. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2011.06.00510.1016/j.bar.2011.06.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
39. Husted, B. W., Salazar, J. J. (2006). Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximising Profits and Social Performance // Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 75–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00583.x10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00583.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
40. Igalens, J., Gond, J. P. (2005). Measuring Corporate Social Performance in France: A Critical and Empirical Analysis of ARESE data // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 131–148. doi: 10.1007/s10551-004-3529-710.1007/s10551-004-3529-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
41. Imran, A., Fatima, A. J. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Reputation and Employee Engagement. – Munich Personal RePEc Archive. University Library of Munich, Germany, p. 17.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
42. Young, S., Marais, M. (2012). A Multi-level Perspective of CSR Reporting: The Implications of National Institutions and Industry Risk Characteristics // Corporate Governance: An International Review. Vol. 20. No. 5, pp. 432–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00926.x10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00926.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
43. Jain, A., Keneley, M., Thomson, D. (2015). Voluntary CSR disclosure works! Evidence from Asia-Pacific banks // Social Responsibility Journal. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 2–18. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-10-2012-013610.1108/SRJ-10-2012-0136
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
44. James, J. B., Mckechine, S., Swanberg, J. (2011). Predicting Employee Engagement in an Age-Diverse Retail Workforce // Journal of Organizational Behavior. Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 173–196. doi: 10.1002/job.68110.1002/job.681
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
45. Jankalova, M. (2015). Approaches to the Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility // Procedia Economics and Finance. Vol. 39, pp. 580–587. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30302-110.1016/S2212-5671(16)30302-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
46. Jasinskas, E., Simanavičienė, Ž. (2009). Valstybės paramos įtaka ūkininkų ūkių socialinei atsakomybei // Economics & Management. Vol. 14, pp. 257–263.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
47. Jenkins, H. (2009). A ‘Business Opportunity’ Model of Corporate Social Responsibility for Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises // Business Ethics: A European Review. Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 21–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01546.x10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01546.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
48. Jhawar, N., Gupta, S. (2017). Understanding CSR- Its History and the Recent Developments // Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 105–109, pp. 2319–7668.10.9790/487X-190506105109
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
49. Khattak, A., Awwan, U., Kraslawski, A. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Priorities in the Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) of the Industrial Sector of Sialkot, Pakistan, pp. 267–278. / In Corporate Social Responsibility in the Manufacturing and Services Sectors (2019). Ed. P. Golinska-Dawson, and M. Spychala – Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, p. 279, doi: org/10.1007/978-3-642-33851-9_1510.1007/978-3-642-33851-9_15
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
50. Lepak, D. P., Snell, S. A. (2002). Examining the Human Resource Architecture: The Relationships Among Human Capital, Employment, and Human Resource Configurations // Journal of Management. Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 517–543. doi: org/10.1177/01492063020280040310.1177/014920630202800403
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
51. Mahadeo, J. D., Oogarah-Hanuman, V., Soobaroyen, T. (2011). A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Social Disclosures in a Developing Economy // Journal of Business and Ethics. Vol. 104, No. 4, pp. 545–558. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0929-310.1007/s10551-011-0929-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
52. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C. (2000). Measuring Corporate Citizenship in Two Countries: The Case of the United States and France // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 283–297. doi: 10.1023/A:100626232521110.1023/A:1006262325211
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
53. Mattingly, J. A. (2017). Corporate Social Performance: A Review of Empirical Research Examining the Corporation-Society Relationship Using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Ratings Data // Business & Society. Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 796–839. doi: 10.1177/000765031558576110.1177/0007650315585761
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
54. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications // Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
55. Midttun, A., Blomgren, A., Magerholm, F., Jakovleva, T., Wenstop, F. (2013). CSR, Innovation and Value Creation in Rapidly Growing Norwegian SMEs. – Research Report, Centre for Corporate Responsibility, Norwegian Business School, p. 36.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
56. Modell, S. (2009). In Defense of Triangulation: A Critical Realist Approach to Mixed Methods Research in Management Accounting // Management Accounting Research. Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 208–221. doi: 10.1016/j. mar.2009.04.00110.1016/j.mar.2009.04.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
57. Mullerat, R. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility: A European Perspective // Miami-Florida European Union Center of Excellence. Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 1–22.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
58. Dal-Ri Murcia, F., Santos, A., (2012). Discretionary-Based Disclosure: Evidence from the Brazilian Market // BAR – Brazilian Administration Review. Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 88–109. doi: 10.1590/S1807-7692201200010000610.1590/S1807-76922012000100006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
59. Murthy, S. S., Rao, S., Mohan, A. (2016). Developing Communities around Factories through Strategic CSR: A Critical Step towards Shared Value in India // Field Actions Science Reports [Online], Special Issue 14. Internet access: http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/4075
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
60. Navickas, V., Kontautienė, R. (2011). Įmonių filantropijos poveikis jų ekonominės veiklos rezultatams // Business: Theory and Practice. Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 15–23. doi: 10.3846/btp.2011.0210.3846/btp.2011.02
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
61. Newman, A., Butler, Ch. (2014). The influence of follower cultural orientation on attitudinal responses towards transformational leadership: evidence from the Chinese hospitality industry // The International Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 1024–1045. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2013.81525010.1080/09585192.2013.815250
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
62. Nisim, S., Benjamin, O. (2008). Power and Size of Firms as Reflected in Cleaning Subcontractors’ Practices of Social Responsibility // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 673–683. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9647-210.1007/s10551-007-9647-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
63. Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising Corporate Social Responsibility as an Essentially Contested Concept: Is a Definition Necessary? // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 89, No. 4, pp. 613–627. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-0021-910.1007/s10551-008-0021-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
64. O’Rourke, D. (2004). Opportunities and Obstacles for Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Developing countries. – For the Corporate Social Responsibility Practice of the World Bank Group, March 2004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
65. Panta, N. D. (2018). Where does Corporate Social Responsibility Stand in Relation to Sustainability? // Oradea Journal of Business and Economics. Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 84–93.10.47535/1991ojbe038
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
66. Patel, P. C., Conklin, B. (2012). Perceived Labor Productivity in Small Firms—The Effects of High-Performance Work Systems and Group Culture Through Employee Retention // Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice. Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 205–235. doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00404.x10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00404.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
67. Porter, M. E., Kramer, R. (2002). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy // Harvard Business Review. Vol. 80, No. 12, (December 2002), pp. 56–69.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
68. Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility // Harvard Business Review. Vol. 84, No. 12, pp. 78–92.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
69. Rahman, S. (2011). Evaluation of Definitions: Ten Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility // World Review of Business Research. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 166–176.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
70. Ramirez, G., Tsangarides, Ch. G. (2007). Competitiveness in the CFA Franc Zone. – International Monetary Fund WP/07/212.10.2139/ssrn.1012995
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
71. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Good Corporate Governance // Business Research Quarterly. Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 137–151. doi: org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.00110.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
72. Sawhny, V. (2008). Analyzing Corporate Social Responsibility Measurement Parameters: Comparing the Global Reporting Initiative to Environmental Reporting Guidelines, Government of Japan and the Public Environmental Reporting, Australia. – Institute for Public Relations, p. 43. Internet access: www.instituteforpr.org
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
73. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G. (2008). Globalization and Corporate Social Responsibility. – The Oxford Hadbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Edited by A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, D. Siegel, Business and Management, Business Policy and Strategy, International Business (2009), pp. 413–431. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.001810.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0018
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
74. Schlierer, H.-J., Werner, A., Signori, S., Garriga, E., Weltzien Hoivik, H., Rossem, A., Fassin, Y. (2012). How Do European SME Owner–Managers Make Sense of “Stakeholder Management”? Insights from a Cross-National Study // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 109, No. 1, pp. 39–51. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1378-310.1007/s10551-012-1378-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
75. Schmidpeter, R., Capaldi, N., Idow, S. O., Sturenberg Herrera, A. (2019). International Dimensions of Sustainable Management: Latest Perspectives from Corporate Governance, Responsible Finance and CSR. – Springer Nature Switzerland AG. p. 341.10.1007/978-3-030-04819-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
76. Searcy, C. (2014). Measuring Enterprise Sustainability // Business Strategy and the Environment. Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 120–133. doi: 10.1002/bse.186110.1002/bse.1861
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
77. Shafer, E. W., Fukukawa, K., Lee, G. M. (2007). Values and the Perceived Importance of Ethics and Social Responsibility: The U.S. versus China // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 70, pp. 265–284. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9110-910.1007/s10551-006-9110-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
78. Silberhorn, D., Warren, R. C. (2007). Defining Corporate Social Responsibility: A View from Big Companies in Germany and the UK // European Business Review. Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 352–372. doi: 10.1108/0955534071081895010.1108/09555340710818950
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
79. Silvestre, W. J., Antunes, P., Leal Filho, W. (2018). The Corporate Sustainability Typology: Analysing Sustainability Drivers and Fostering Sustainability at Enterprises // Technological and Economic Development of Economy. Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 513–533. doi: 10.3846/20294913.2016.121319910.3846/20294913.2016.1213199
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
80. Simionescu, L. N. (2015). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainable Development (SD) // Internal Auditing & Risk Management. Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 179–190.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
81. Singh, J., Svensson, G., Wood, G., Callaghan, M. (2011). A longitudinal and Cross-Cultural Study of the Contents of Codes of Ethics of Australian, Canadian and Swedish Corporations // Business Ethics: A European Review. Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 103–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2010.01612.x10.1111/j.1467-8608.2010.01612.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
82. Skouloudis, A. (2014). Revisiting the National Corporate Social Responsibility Index. – Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Internet access: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/64864
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
83. Stemler, S. (2001). An Overview of Content Analysis // Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. Vol. 7, No. 17. Internet access: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
84. Turker, D. (2009). Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development Study // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 411–427. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9780-610.1007/s10551-008-9780-6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
85. Tziner, A., Bar, Y., Oren, L., Kadosh, G. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility, Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction: How do They Interrelate, If at All? // Revista de Psichologia del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones. Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 67–72. doi: 10.5093/tr2011v27n1a710.5093/tr2011v27n1a7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
86. Uddin, S., Siddiqui, J., Islam, M. A. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures, Traditionalism and Politics: A Story from a Traditional Setting // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 151, No. 2, pp. 409–428. doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3214-710.1007/s10551-016-3214-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
87. Unerman J. (2000). Methodological Issues: Reflections on Quantification in Corporate Social Reporting Content Analysis // Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. No. 13, No. 5, pp. 667–681. doi: 10.1108/0951357001035375610.1108/09513570010353756
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
88. Vitezic, N. (2011). Corporate Reputation and Social Responsibility: An Analysis of Large Companies in Croatia // International Journal of Economics and Business Research. Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 85–96. doi: 10.19030/iber.v10i8.538010.19030/iber.v10i8.5380
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
89. Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., Javidan, M. (2004). CEO Transformational Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility. – Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics, pp. 1–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00642.x10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00642.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
90. Wettstein, F. (2009). Beyond Voluntariness, Beyond CSR: Making a Case for Human Rights and Justice // Business and Society Review. Vol. 114, No. 1, pp. 125–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8594.2009.00338.x10.1111/j.1467-8594.2009.00338.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
91. Zadek, S., Raynard, P., Oliveria, C. (2005). Responsible Competitiveness. Reshaping Global Markets Through Responsible Business Practices. – AccountAbility: FDC, p. 130.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
92. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal Relationships between Job Resources, Personal Resources, and Work Engagement // Journal of Vocational Behavior. Vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.00310.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The Problems of the Assessment of Corporate Social Responsibility in the International Context

Abstract

Paradigm

My account