Economic Policy and Open Innovation Ecosystems: Biomedicine Case

Giedrė Kvedaravičienė

doi:10.1515/mosr-2019-0013

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Economic Policy and Open Innovation Ecosystems: Biomedicine Case

Management of Organizations: Systematic Research

Volume 82 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019)

By: Giedrė Kvedaravičienė

Open Access

|Mar 2020

Abstract

The paper overviews different perspectives of innovations in the economy. Taking empirical data of the biomedicine sector, the EU policy insights on innovation, as well as Lithuania’s data of the public healthcare sector, the paper provides insights aiming to define the specificity of innovations in the biomedicine sector and to suggest further research directions which could contribute economic theory and practice.

References

1. The Government of the Republic of Lithuania (2012). Lithuania’s Progress Strategy 2030. Internet access: https://lrv.lt/uploads/main/documents/files/EN_version/Useful_information/lithuania2030.pdf [accessed January 20, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. MOSTA (2018). Executive summary of the questionnaire report on reasons of low cooperation levels between scientific and business institutions in Lithuania “Science and Business cooperation on scientific research and experimental activities“ (in Lithuanian only). Internet access: https://mosta.lt/images/documents/atasakaitos/Mokslo%20ir%20verslo%20bendradarbiavimo%20MTEP%20srityje%20tyrimo%20rezultat%C5%B3%20ataskaita_MOSTA_2018.pdf [accessed January 20, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. European Commission (2018). The European Union’s Efforts to Simplify Legislation. 2018 Annual Burden survey. Internet access: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/2018-annual-burden-survey_en.pdf [accessed January 28, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. European Commission (2016). Better Regulations for Innovation-driven Investment at the EU level. Internet access: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/404b82db-d08b-11e5-a4b5-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-79728021 [accessed January 28, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. European Commission (2016). Joint Report on Health Care and Long-Term Care Systems & Fiscal Sustainability. Internet access: https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/economy-finance/joint-report-health-care-and-long-term-care-systems-fiscal-sustainability-0_en [accessed January 28, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. European Commission (2016). Open innovation book: Open innovation. Open Science. Open to the world-a vision for Europe. Internet access: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/open-innovation-open-science-open-world-vision-europe [accessed January 30, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. OECD (2015). Highlight of the OECD Science, Technology and Industry scoreboard 2015. Internet access: http://www.oecd.org/sti/Science-brief-scoreboard.pdf [accessed June 10, 2019].10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2015-en
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Xu, G., Wu, Y., Minshall, T., Zhou, T. (2017). Exploring Innovation Ecosystems across Science, Technology, and Business: A case of 3D printing in China // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 136, pp. 208–221. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.03010.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.030
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Jucevicius, G., Grumadaite, K. (2014). Smart Development of Innovation Ecosystem // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 156, pp. 125–129. doi: 10.1016/j. sbspro.2014.11.133.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.133
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Giest, S. (2019). Trust Dynamics in Innovation Networks: The Chicago Life Science Cluster // Administration & Society. Vol. 51, Issue 2, pp. 325–324. doi: 10.1177%2F009539971770152210.1177/0095399717701522
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Valkokari, K, Seppänen, M., Mäntylä, M., Jylhä-Ollila, S. (2017). Orchestrating Innovation Ecosystems: A Qualitative Analysis of Ecosystem Positioning Strategies // Technology Innovation Management Review. Vol. 7, Issue 3, pp. 12–24. doi: 10.22215/timreview/106110.22215/timreview/1061
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Lundvall, B. A., Borrás, S., (2004). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy // The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Vol. 1. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0022.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0022
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Ramberg, I., Knell, M. (2012). Challenges measuring effects of research and innovation policy interventions in ex-post impact evaluations. A synthesis report. Internet access: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260552896_Challenges_measuring_effects_of_research_and_innovation_policy_interventions_in_expost_impact_evaluations_A_synthesis_report [accessed August, 27 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Varga, A., Sebestyén, T., Szabó, N., Szerb, L. (2018). Estimating the Economic Impacts of Knowledge Network and Entrepreneurship Development in Smart Specialization Policy // Regional studies. Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 48–59. Doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.152702610.1080/00343404.2018.1527026
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation. Enhancing Research Performance through Evaluation, Impact Assessment and Priority Setting. Internet access: https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/Enhancing-Public-Research-Performance.pdf [accessed August 27, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. European Commission. (2018). Science, Research and Innovation Performance 2018, Chapter I.4. Internet access: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/srip-report-chap-1-4_2018_en.pdf [accessed November 16, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs (2015). Efficiency Estimates of Health Care Systems. Internet access: https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/economic_paper/2015/pdf/ecp549_en.pdf [accessed January 29, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. McKinsey & Company (2019). Precision Medicine: Opening the Aperture. Internet access: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/pharmaceuticals-and-medical-products/our-insights/precision-medicine-opening-the-aperture [accessed August 14, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. ScienceDirect, online database of scientific and medical research. Internet access: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/economic-policy [accessed August 15, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Open Innovation community, online platform. Internet access: http://openinnovation.net/about-2/open-innovation-definition/ [accessed August 15, 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mosr-2019-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2335-8750 | Journal ISSN: 1392-1142

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 53 - 69

Submitted on: Aug 28, 2019

Accepted on: Dec 16, 2019

Published on: Mar 31, 2020

Published by: Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Economics and Management

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

Keywords:

Related subjects:

Business and economics,

Business management,

Marketing, sales, customer relations,

Management, organization, corporate governance,

Business development, change management, cooperation,

Human resources, labor practice, job and career

© 2020 Giedrė Kvedaravičienė, published by Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Economics and Management
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 82 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019)