Self-Organisation Perspective to Responsible Innovation in Industry

Jolita Čeičytė; Monika Petraitė

doi:10.1515/mosr-2017-0013

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Self-Organisation Perspective to Responsible Innovation in Industry

Management of Organizations: Systematic Research

Volume 78 (2017): Issue 1 (December 2017)

By: Jolita Čeičytė and Monika Petraitė

Open Access

|Feb 2018

Abstract

Based on scientific literature analysis, the article examines the complex nature of the responsible innovation concept and provides the conceptual integration of a self-organisation perspective into the concept of responsible innovation within industry. Self-organisation characteristics are presented and argued as useful constructs for a better understanding of responsible innovation processes.

References

1. Allen, P. M., Lesser, M. (1991). Evolutionary Human Systems: Learning, Ignorance and Subjectivity // In Evolutionary Theories of Economic and Technological Change, eds. P. P. Saviotti, J. S. Metcalfe. - Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers, p. 160–171.10.4324/9781351127707-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Armstrong, M., Cornut, G., Delacôte, S., Lenglet, M., Millo, Y., Muniesa, F., Tadjeddine, Y. (2012). Towards a Practical Approach to Responsible Innovation in Finance: New Product Committees Revisited // Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance. Vol. 20, No. 2, p. 147–168. doi: 10.1108/13581981211218289.10.1108/13581981211218289
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. - Sage.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Berkhout, F. (2014). Sustainable Innovation Management. Innovation and Sustainability // In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, ed. M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, N. Phillips. - Oxford: University Press, p. 290–315.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.013.011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Biggiero, L. (2001). Self-organizing Processes in Building Entrepreneurial Networks: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation // Human Systems Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, p. 209–222.10.3233/HSM-2001-20304
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Blok, V., Hoffmans, L., Wubben, E. F. M. (2015). Stakeholder Engagement for Responsible Innovation in the Private Sector: Critical Issues and Management Practices // Journal on Chain and Network Science. Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 147–164. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2015.x003.10.3920/JCNS2015.x003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Blok, V., Lemmens, P. (2015). The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation / In Responsible Innovation Vol. 2, p. 19–35. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_2.10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Scholten, V. E., Blok, V. (2015). Foreword: Responsible Innovation in the Private Sector // Journal on Chain and Network Science, Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 101–105. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2015.x006.10.3920/JCNS2015.x006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Buenstorf, G. (2000). Self-organization and Sustainability: Energetics of Evolution and Implications for Ecological Economics // Ecological Economics, Vol. 33 No. 1, p. 119–134.10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00133-0
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Burget, M., Bardone, E., Pedaste, M. (2017). Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review // Science and engineering ethics, Vol. 23, No. 1, p. 1–19.10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Cagnin, C., Amanatidou, E., Keenan, M. (2012). Orienting European Innovation Systems towards Grand Challenges and the Roles that FTA can Play // Science and public policy, Vol. 39, No. 2, p. 140–152. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs014.10.1093/scipol/scs014
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Castells, M. (2011). The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture (Vol. 1). - John Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Čeičytė, J., Petraitė, M. (2014). Atsakingųjų inovacijų koncepcija // Viešoji politika ir administravimas. T. 13, Nr. 3, p. 400–413. doi: 10.5755/j01.ppaa.13.3.8302.10.5755/j01.ppaa.13.3.8302
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Chiles, T. H., Meyer, A. D., Hench, T. J. (2004). Organizational emergence: The origin and transformation of Branson, Missouri’s musical theaters // Organization Science, Vol. 15, No. 5, p. 499–519.10.1287/orsc.1040.0095
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., Phillips, N. (2014). Perspectives on Innovation Management / The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. - Oxford: University Press, p. 3–25.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. European Commission (2008). European Cmmissions Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanotechnologies Research. Internet access: <http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/nanocode-rec_pe0894c_en.pdf> [accessed September 3, 2017].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. European Commission (2011). DG Research Workshop on Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe. Internet access: <http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/responsibleresearch-and-innovation-workshop-newsletter_en.pdf> [accessed September 3, 2017].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. European Commission (2012). Responsible Research and Innovation: Europe’s Ability to Respond to Societal Challenges. Internet access: <https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_rri/KI0214595ENC.pdf> [accessed September 3, 2017].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Grumadaitė, K., Jucevičius, G. (2017). Preconditions for Emergence of Lithuanian Clusters: From Informal Cooperation to Its Legitimation // Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Vol. 77, No. 1, p. 37–56. doi: 10.1515/mosr-2017-0003.10.1515/mosr-2017-0003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Grunwald, A. (2014). Technology Assessment for Responsible Innovation. In Responsible Innovation 1, p. 15–31. - Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Hellstrom, T. (2003). Systematic Innovation and Risk: Technology Assessment and the Challenge of Responsible Innovation // Technology in Society. Vol. 25, p. 369–384. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1.10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Lubberink, R., Blok, V., van Ophem, J., Omta, O. (2017). Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices // Sustainability, Vol. 9, No. 5.10.3390/su9050721
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Lund Declaration (2009). Konferencija: Nauji pasauliai – naujos išeitys. Moksliniai tyrimai ir inovacijos kaip pagrindas Europos vystymuisi globaliame kontekste. Lundas, Švedija, 7–8 Liepa, 2009. Internet access: <http://www.se2009.eu/polopoly_fs/1.8460!menu/standard/file/lund_declaration_final_version_9_july.pdf> [accessed September 15, 2017].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. McKelvey, B. (2001). What is Complexity Science? It is Really Order-Creation Science // Emergence, A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management. Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 137–157.10.1207/S15327000EM0301_09
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Owen, R. (2009). A New Era of Responsible Innovation. Internet access: <http://planetearth.nerc.ac.uk/features/story.aspx?id=460&cookieConsent=A [accessed September 10, 2017].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Owen, R., Bessant, J., Heintz, M. (2013). Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. - John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118551424
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society // Science and Public Policy. Vol. 39, No. 6, p. 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093.10.1093/scipol/scs093
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Palm, E., Hansson, S. O. (2006). The Case for Ethical Technology Assessment (eTA) // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 73, No. 5, p. 543–558. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.002.10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Pandza, K., Ellwood, P. (2013). Strategic and Ethical Foundations for Responsible Innovation // Research Policy. Vol. 42, No. 5, p. 1112–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.007.10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Pavie, X. (2012). The Importance of Responsible-Innovation and the Necessity of “Innovation-Care”. Internet access: <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2330132> [accessed September 10, 2017].10.2139/ssrn.2330132
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Pavie, X., Carthy, D. (2013). An Integration of Responsible Innovation in the Financial Sector through Design Thinking. Internet access: <http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/92/14/28/PDF/WP1324.pdf> [accessed September 15, 2017].10.2139/ssrn.2370396
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Pavie, X., Scholten, V., Carthy, D. (2014). Responsible Innovation: From Concept to Practice. Singapore: - World Scientific Publishing Co.10.1142/8903
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Petraite, M., Pavie, X., Ceicyte, J., Janiunaite, B., Carthy, D. (2017). Managing Innovation in Multicultural Environments: An Imperative of Responsibility Within Interorganizational Networks. In Intercultural Interactions in the Multicultural Workplace, p. 137–154. - Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-39771-9_10
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Plowman, D. A., Solansky, S., Beck, T. E., Baker, L., Kulkarni, M., Travis, D. V. (2007). The role of leadership in emergent, self-organization // The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 4, p. 341–356.10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Pyka, A., Windrum, P. (2003). The Self-Organisation of Strategic Alliances // Economics of innovation and new technology, Vol. 12, No. 3, p. 245-268. doi: 10.1080/10438590290025561.10.1080/10438590290025561
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Rittel, H. W. M, Weber (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning // Policy Sciences, Vol. 4.10.1007/BF01405730
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. Rycroft, R. W., Kash, D. E. (2004). Self-organizing innovation networks: implications for globalization // Technovation, Vol. 24, No. 3, p. 187–197.10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00092-0
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. Stahl, B. C. (2013). Responsible Research and Innovation: The Role of Privacy in an Emerging Framework. Internet access: <http://spp.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/09/19/scipol.sct067.full.pdf+html> [accessed September 10, 2017].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
39. Stahl, B. C., McBride, N., Wakunuma, K., Flick, C. (2013). The Empathic Robot: A Prototipe of Responsible Research and Innovation. Internet access: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261563960_The_empathic_care_robot_A_prototype_of_responsible_research_and_innovation> [accessed September 10, 2017].10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
40. Stilgoe, J. (2013). Foreword: Why Responsible Innovation? / In R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz (ed.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. - John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
41. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation. Internet access: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733313000930> [accessed September 10, 2017].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
42. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting Leadership from the Industrial Age to the Knowledge Era // The Leadership Quarterly. Vol. 18, No. 4, p. 298–318. doi 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002.10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
43. Van den Hoven, J. (2013). Value Sensitive Design and Responsible Innovation. / In R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz (ed.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. - John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9781118551424.ch4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
44. Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A Vision of Responsible Innovation. Internet access: <https://europa.eu/sinapse/sinapse/index.cfm?&fuseaction=lib.attachment&lib_id=B98F4473-BB94-B4A9-3B6749A0CC445DFA&attach=LIB_DOC_EN> [accessed September 10, 2017].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
45. Witt, U. (1998). Imagination and leadership–the neglected dimension of an evolutionary theory of the firm // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 35, No. 2, p. 161–177.10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00058-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mosr-2017-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2335-8750 | Journal ISSN: 1392-1142

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 21 - 32

Submitted on: Oct 30, 2017

Accepted on: Dec 10, 2017

Published on: Feb 6, 2018

Published by: Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Economics and Management

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

Keywords:

responsible innovation,

self-organisation,

complexity,

industry

Related subjects:

Business and economics,

Business management,

Marketing, sales, customer relations,

Management, organization, corporate governance,

Business development, change management, cooperation,

Human resources, labor practice, job and career

© 2018 Jolita Čeičytė, Monika Petraitė, published by Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Economics and Management
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 78 (2017): Issue 1 (December 2017)