Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Word problems and make-believe: Using frame analysis and ethnomethodology to explore aspects of the culture of schooling Cover

Word problems and make-believe: Using frame analysis and ethnomethodology to explore aspects of the culture of schooling

Open Access
|Feb 2018

References

  1. Adamson, H.D. (2005). Language minority students in American schools: An education in English. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410612519
  2. Amerine, R., & Bilmes, J. (1988). Following instructions. Human Studies, 11, 327–339.10.1007/BF00177308
  3. Baruk, S. (1985). L’Âge du capitaine: De l’erreur en mathématiques. Paris: Seuil.
  4. Baker, C. (1997). Ethnomethodological studies of talk in educational settings. In B. Davies, & D. Corson, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Vol. III. Oral Discourse and Education (pp. 43-52). London: Kluwer.
  5. Benincasa, L. (1997). A Journey, a struggle, a ritual: Higher education and the entrance examinations in a Greek province town. PhD Thesis, University of Stockholm, Sweden.
  6. Braud, D. S. (2010). Radicis: Ideology, argument and composition courses in American colleges. PhD Thesis, Loyola University, Chicago, IL. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from the Loyola University website: http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/167
  7. Carbaugh, D. (2007). Cultural discourse analysis: Communication practices and intercultural encounters. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 167-182.10.1080/17475750701737090
  8. Cole, M. (1976). Forward. In A. R. Luria: Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations (pp. xi-xvi). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  9. Creider, S. (2009). Frames, footing, and teacher-initiated questions: An analysis of a beginning French class for adults. APPLE Award Winning Papers in TESOL & AL 9(2). Retrieved March 16, 2014, from the Columbia University website:http://tesolal.columbia.edu/article/frames-footing-and-teacher-initiated-questions/
  10. D’Amore, B. (2013). La ricerca in didattica della matematica e la sua applicazione concreta in aula. In: 3st Conference UMI-CIIM. Salerno, October 17-19. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from the Commissione Italiana per l’Insegnamento della Matematica website: http://www.umi-ciim.it/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/VF_DAmore_Testo-Conferenza-per-Salerno.pdf
  11. Dellarosa-Cummins, D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word problems. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 405-438.10.1016/0010-0285(88)90011-4
  12. Douillard, K. A. (2006). Examining the teaching and learning of writing in elementary school. PhD Thesis, University of California, San Diego, CA.
  13. Gallagher, K. (2006). Beyond fake writing: The power of choice. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
  14. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  15. Gerofsky, S. G. (1999). The word problem as genre in mathematics education. MA diss. Simon Fraser University, Canada: Faculty of Education.
  16. Gershman, K. W. (2004). They always test us on things we haven’t read: Teen laments and lessons learned. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
  17. Goffman, E. (1972/1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. London: Penguin
  18. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  19. Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48 (1), 1-17.10.2307/2095141
  20. Griffin S. (2003). The development of math competence in the preschool and early school years: Cognitive foundations and instructional strategies. In J.M. Royer (Ed.), Mathematical cognition (pp. 1-32). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  21. Harries-Jones, P. (1995). A recursive vision: Ecological understanding and Gregory Bateson (2nd revised ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442670440
  22. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. (Eds.). (2001). Specific learning disabilities and difficulties in children and adolescents. Psychological assessment and evaluation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511526794
  23. Keating, E. (1993). Correction/repair as a resource for co-construction of group competence. Pragmatics, 3(4), 411-23.10.1075/prag.3.4.03kea
  24. Konti, M. (2007). Ta themata tis ekthesis ideon stis Panelladikes Eksetasis (1983-2001): Dokimazontas tin gramsiani ennia tou kinou nou [The composition topics at the general examinations (1983-2001): Exploring the Gramscian concept of common sense]. Paper presented at the conference Antonio Gramsci in the social sciences and in theory today, Athens, 30 November-1December. 2007. Retrieved May 2, 2014, from the Panteion University website: http://pandemos.panteion.gr/index.php?op=record&pid=iid:609
  25. Kutner, L. (2007). Midnight monsters and imaginary companions. PhD Thesis. Psych Central. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from the Psych Central website: http://psychcentral.com/lib/midnight-monsters-and-imaginary-companions/0001270
  26. Lee, Y. A. (2007). Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 180–206.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.02.004
  27. Liatsou, O. (2001). Ekthesi anideon stin triti likeiou [Essay writing without ideas in upper secondary school] Kiriakatiki Eleftherotipia, August 05. Retrieved March 12, 2015, from the Netschoolbook website: http://www.netschoolbook.gr/ekthesi.html
  28. Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  29. Lynxwiler, J. (1999). Frame analysis and the problems of paired course development. Paper presented at the Learning Communities Conference, Tampa, FL, March. Retrieved March 2, 2015, from the University of North Carolina website: http://horizon.unc.edu/conferences/lc/papers/11.html
  30. Macbeth, D. (2004). The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language in Society, 33(5), 703–736.10.1017/S0047404504045038
  31. Maynard, D. W, & Kardash, T. (2007). Ethnomethodology. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 1483-1486). Boston: Blackwell.
  32. McDermott, R.P. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In C. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269 305). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  33. McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1999). Adam, Adam, Adam, and Adam: The cultural construction of a learning disability. In H. Varenne, & R. McDermott (Eds.), Successful failure: The school America builds (pp. 25-44). Boulder, CO: West-view Press.
  34. McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7(2), 183-213.10.1017/S0047404500005522
  35. Mehan, H. (1984). Language and schooling. Sociology of Education, 57(3), 174-183.10.2307/2112601
  36. Mehan, H. (1993). Beneath the skin and between the ears: A case study in the politics of representation. In S. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice (pp. 241 268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511625510.010
  37. Mehan, H. (1998). The study of social interaction in educational settings: Accomplishments and unresolved issues. Human Development, 41(4), 245-269. Retrieved March 09, 2017, from the University of Michigan website: http://www.umich.edu/~psycours/561/mehan.htm
  38. Mosca, G. (1968). Ricordi di scuola. Milano: Rizzoli.
  39. Müller, S. M. (2016). Körperliche Un-Fertigkeiten: Ballett als unendliche Perfektion. Wilerswist: Velbrueck Gmbh.10.5771/9783845280943
  40. Ozemir, O. (2009). Three turn sequences in reading classroom discourse. In M. Edwardes (Ed.), Proceedings of the BAAL Annual Conference 2008 (pp. 117-122). Newcastle: Newcastle University, Scitsiugnil Press.
  41. Pennington, M. C. (1999). Framing bilingual classroom discourse: Lessons from Hong Kong secondary school English classes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2(1), 53-73.10.1080/13670059908666246
  42. Rogoff, B., Moore, L., Najafi, B., Dexter A., Correa-Chávez, M, & Solís, J. (2005). Children’s development of cultural repertoires through participation in everyday routines and practices. In J. Grusec, & J. P. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (pp. 490-515). NY: Guilford.
  43. Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382.10.1353/lan.1977.0041
  44. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s All the Fuss about Metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  45. Shweder, R. A., & Bourne, E. J. (1984). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In R. Shweder, & R. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 158-199). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  46. Slattery, S. (2006). A man left Albuquerque heading East: Word problems as genre in mathematics education.’ Review of A man left Albuquerque heading East: Word problems as genre in mathematics education, by Susan Gerofsky. Retrieved March 19, 2015, from the Mathematical Association of America website: http://www.maa.org/publications/maareviews/a-man-left-albuquerque-heading-east-wordproblems-as-genre-in-mathematicseducation
  47. Strong, W. (2003). Writing across the hidden curriculum. The Quarterly, 25(1), 2-7 & 38.
  48. Toom, A. (2010). Word problems in Russia and America. Extended version of a talk at the meeting of the Swedish Mathematical Society. June, 2005. Updated version. Retrieved March 22, 2015, from The Universidade Federal de Pernambuco website: http://www.de.ufpe.br/~toom/travel/sweden05/WP-SWEDEN-NEW.pdf
  49. Urciuoli, B.(n.d.). Discourse, culture, and social structure: Some basics. Handout, Retrieved January 22, 2015, from the University of Illinois website: http://www.eui.illinois.edu/resources/methods/reading/documents/Urciuoli_Discourse_Analyis.pdf
  50. Verhoeven, J. (1985). Goffman’s frame analysis and modern micro-sociological paradigms. In H.J. Helle, & S.N. Eisenstandt, Micro-sociological theory: Perspectives on sociological theory. Vol. II (pp. 71-100). London: SAGE.
  51. Yardley, K.M. (1984). A critique of role play terminology in social psychology experimentation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23(2), 113-120.10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00620.x
  52. Yardley-Matwiejczuk, K. M. (1997). Role play: Theory and practice. London: SAGE. Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An introduction to sociolinguistics (5th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2017-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1338-2144 | Journal ISSN: 1338-1563
Language: English
Page range: 77 - 99
Published on: Feb 16, 2018
Published by: University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Luciana Benincasa, published by University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.