References
- Bartlett, F. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press.
- Booth, W. C. (1985). The rhetoric of fiction, 2nd Ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1961).
- Buber, M. (1970). I and thou (Walter Kaufmann, Trans.). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. (Original work published 1923).
- Fox, M. (2005, October). Wayne C. Booth, critic who analyzed rhetoric, dies at 84, The New York Times. Retrieved from http://nyti.ms/23wfI6K.
- Freire P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Myra Bergman Ramos, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1968).
- Hoffer, E. (1951). The true believer. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
- Kafka, F. (1972). The metamorphosis (Stanley Corngold, Trans.). New York, NY: Bantam Books. (Original work published 1915).
- Knapp, M. (1983). Dyadic relationship development. In J. Wiemann & R. Harrison (Eds.), Nonverbal Interaction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Knapp, M., Ellis, D., & Williams, B. (1980). Perceptions of communication behavior associated with relationship terms. Communication Monographs, 47, 262-278.
- Knapp, M., & Vangelisti, A. (1992). Interpersonal communication and human relationships. (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Kertész, I. (2004). Fatelessness (Tim Wilkinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Random House.
- Lewis, C. S. (2015). The New York C.S. Lewis Society. Retrieved from http://www. nycslsociety.com/books.html.
- Pearce, W. B., & Cronen, V. (1980). Communication, action and meaning: The creation of social realities. New York, NY: Praeger.
- Pearce W. B. (2004). Using CMM. Woodside, California: A Pearce Associates Seminar.
- Retrieved from http://www.pearceassociates.com/essays/cmm_seminar.pdf.
- Piaget, J. (1936). Origins of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Thompson, C., & Kleine, M. (2015). An interdisciplinary dialog about teaching and learning dialogically. Innovative Higher Education, 40, 173-185.
- Thompson, C., & Kleine, M. (2016). Varied responses as a means to the richness of discourse: Reading tough texts through speaking and writing. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(5), 1-7.