Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The relationship between fluid intelligence and learning potential: Is there an interaction with attentional control? Cover

The relationship between fluid intelligence and learning potential: Is there an interaction with attentional control?

Journal of Pedagogy
Volume 6 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2015

References

  1. Ackerman, P., Beier, M., &amp; Boyle, M. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 30-60.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., &amp; West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Alloway, T. P. (2009). Cognitive training: Improvements in academic attainments. Professional Association for Teachers of Students with Specific Learning Difficulties, 22, 57-61.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Alloway, T. P. (2010). Working memory and executive function profiles of students with borderline intellectual functioning. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(5), 448-456.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01281.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01281.x</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Alloway, T. P., &amp; Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 20-29.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, V., Jacobs, R., &amp; Anderson, P. J. (Eds.). (2008). Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A lifespan perspective. NY: Psychology Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417-423.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Baddeley, A. D., &amp; Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Banich, M. T., Milham, M. P., Atchley, R., Cohen, N. J., Webb, A., &amp; Wszalek, T. (2000). fMRI studies of Stroop tasks reveal unique roles of anterior and posterior brain systems in attentional selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 988-1000.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290051137521" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1162/08989290051137521</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Blair, C. (2006). How similar are fluid cognition and general intelligence? A developmental neuroscience perspective on fluid cognition as an aspect of human cognitive ability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(2), 109-160.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009034" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/S0140525X06009034</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Brydges, C. R., Reid, C. L., Fox, A. M., &amp; Anderson, M. (2012). A unitary executive function predicts intelligence in children. Intelligence, 40, 458-469.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.05.006" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.intell.2012.05.006</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In: C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 53-81). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Carlson, J. S., &amp; Wiedl, K. H. (1979). Toward a differential testing approach: Testing- -the-limits employing the Raven matrices. Intelligence, 3(4), 323-344.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(79)90002-3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/0160-2896(79)90002-3</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Carter, C. S., Mintun, M., Cohen, J. D. (1995). Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: An (H2O)-O-15 PET study of Stroop task performance. Neuroimage, 2(4), 264-272.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1995.1034" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1006/nimg.1995.1034</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Chuderski, A. (2014). Which working memory components predict fluid intelligence. Psychology, 5(5), 328-339.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.55043" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4236/psych.2014.55043</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Chuderski, A., Taraday, M., Nęcka, E., &amp; Smoleń, T. (2012). Storage capacity explains fluid intelligence while executive control does not. Intelligence, 40(3), 278-295.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.010" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.010</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Colom, R., Rebollo, I., Palacios, A., Juan-Espinosa, &amp; M. Kyllonen, P. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32(2004), 277-296.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., &amp; Minkoff, S. R. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30(2002), 163-183.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., &amp; Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Džuka, J., &amp; Kovalčíková, I. (2008). Dynamické testovanie latentných učebných schopností [Dynamic testing of latent learning abilities]. Československá Psychologie, 52(4), 366-377.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Elliott, J., Grigorenko, E. L., &amp; Resing, W. C. M. (2010). Dynamic assessment: The need for a dynamic approach. In E. Baker, B. McGraw, &amp; P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Elliot, J. &amp; Lauchlan, F. (1997). Assessing potential: The search for the philosopher’s stone? Educational and Child Psychology, 14(4), 6-16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Engle, R. W., &amp; Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 145-199). New York, NJ: Elsevier.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Fabio, R. A. (2005). Dynamic assessment of intelligence is a better reply to adaptive behaviour and cognitive plasticity. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(1), 41-64.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.3200/GENP.132.1.41-66" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3200/GENP.132.1.41-66</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Ferrer, E., McArdle, J. J., Shawitz, B. A., Holahan, J. N., Marchione, K., &amp; Shawitz, S. E. (2007). Longitudinal models of developmental dynamics between reading and cognition from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1460-1473.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1460" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1460</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., &amp; Hoffman, M. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device (LPAD). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., &amp; Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Fiszdon, J. M., McClough, J. F., Silverstein, S. M., Bell, M. D., Jaramillo, J. R., &amp; Smith, T. E. (2006). Learning potential as a predictor of readiness for psychosocial rehabilitation in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 143(2-3), 159-166.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2005.09.012" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.psychres.2005.09.012</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Freund, P. A., &amp; Holling, H. (2011). Retest effects in matrix test performance: Differential impact of predictors at different hierarchy levels in an educational setting. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 597-601.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.006" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.006</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., Defries, J. C., &amp; Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17(2), 172-179.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01681.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01681.x</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Haywood, H. C. (1997). Interactive assessment. In R. Taylor (Ed.), Assessment of persons with mental retardation (pp. 103-129). San Diego: Singular Publishing Haywood, H. C., &amp; Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Hornung, C., Brunner, M., Reuter, R. A. P., &amp; Martin, R. (2011). Children’s working memory: Its structure and relationship to fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 39(4), 210-22.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.002</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Hotulainen, R., Thuneberg, H., Hautamäki, J., &amp; Vainikainen, M-P. (2014). Measured attention in prolonged over-learned response tasks and its correlation to high level scientific reasoning and school achievement. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 56(3), 237-254.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Jeltova, I., Birney, D., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L., Sternberg, R. J., &amp; Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Making instruction and assessment responsive to diverse students’ progress: Group-administered dynamic assessment in teaching mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(4), 381-395.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411407868" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/0022219411407868</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CN: Praeger.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Kail, R. V. (2007). Longitudinal evidence that increases in processing speed and working memory enhance children’s reasoning. Psychological Science, 18(4), 312-313.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01895.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01895.x</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., &amp; Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent variable approach to verbal and visuo-spatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189-217.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Kovalčíková, I. (2009). Dynamic testing and assessment of latent learning capacities. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1, 47-53.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Kovalčíková, I. (Ed.). (2010). Kognitívna stimulácia individuálnych edukačných potrieb žiaka zo sociálne znevýhodňujúceho prostredia [Cognitive stimulation of individual The Relationship Between Fluid Intelligence And Learning Potential: Is There An Interaction... 3 9 educational needs of pupils from socially disadvantaging environments]. Prešov, Slovakia: Vydavateľstvo Prešovskej univerzity.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Lee, K., Pe, M. L., Ang, S. Y., &amp; Stankov, L. (2009). Do measures of working memory predict academic proficiency better than measures of intelligence? Psychology Science Quarterly, 51(4), 403-419.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Lehto, J. E., Juujärvi, P., Kooistra, L., &amp; Pulkkinen, L. (2003). Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 59-80.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1348/026151003321164627" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1348/026151003321164627</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Lidz, C. (2000). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale. In C. S. Lidz &amp; J. G.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., &amp; Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288(5472), 1835-1838.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Mackey, A. P., Hill, S. S., Stone, S. I., &amp; Bunge, S. A. (2011). Dissociable effects of reasoning and speed training in children. Developmental Science, 14(3), 582-590.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01005.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01005.x</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. New York: Erlbaum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. McCandliss, B., Beck, I. L., Sandak, R., &amp; Perfetti, C. (2003). Focusing attention on decoding for children with poor reading skills: Design and preliminary tests of the word building intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 75-104.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_05" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_05</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Milham, M. P., Erickson, K. I., Banich, M. T., Kramer, A. F., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., &amp; Cohen, N. J. (2002). Attentional control in the aging brain: Insights from an fMRI study of the Stroop task. Brain and Cognition, 49(3), 277-296.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2001.1501" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1006/brcg.2001.1501</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., &amp; Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49-100.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1006/cogp.1999.0734</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Posner, M. I., &amp; Dehaene, S. (1994). Attentional networks. Trends in Neuroscience, 17(2), 75-79.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(94)90078-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/0166-2236(94)90078-7</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Primi, R., Ferrão, M. E., &amp; Almeida, L. S. (2010). Fluid intelligence as a predictor of learning: A longitudinal multilevel approach applied to math. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 446-451.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Resing, W. C. M. (2013). Dynamic testing and individualized instruction: Helpful in cognitive education? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(1), 81-95.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.81" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.81</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Resing, W. C. M., Stevenson, C., &amp; Bosma, T. (2012). Dynamic testing: Measuring inductive reasoning in children with developmental disabilities and mild cognitive impairments. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11(2), 159-178.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.11.2.159" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1891/1945-8959.11.2.159</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Ropovik, I. (2014). Do executive functions predict the ability to learn problem-solving principles? Intelligence, 44, 64-74.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.03.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.intell.2014.03.002</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Schweizer, K. (2010). The relationship of attention and intelligence. In A. Gruszka, G. Matthiews, &amp; B. Szymura (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (pp. 247-262). New York: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Sergi, M. J., Kern, R. S., Mintz, J., &amp; Green, M. F. (2005). Learning potential and the prediction of work skill acquisition in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31(1), 67-72.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbi007" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/schbul/sbi007</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Spearman, C. (1904). “General Intelligence,” objectively determined and measured.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/1412107</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., &amp; Freeman, D. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 278-303.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/747822" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/747822</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Stauffer, J. M., Ree, M. J., &amp; Caretta, T. R. (1996). Cognitive-components tests are not much more than g: An extension of Kyllonen’s analysis. Journal of General Psychology, 123, 193-205.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1996.9921272" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/00221309.1996.9921272</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Sternberg, R. J., &amp; Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Birney, D. P., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L., &amp; Jeltova, I. (2007). Dynamic instruction for and assessment of developing expertise in four ethnic groups. In E. J. Gubbins (Ed.), Research Monograph of the National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. University of Connecticut. Stevenson C. E. (2012). Puzzling with potential. Dynamic testing of analogical reasoning in children (Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukkerij.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Stevenson, C. E., Hickendorff, M., Resing, W. C. M., Heiser, W., &amp; de Boeck, P. (2013). Explanatory item response modeling of children’s change on a dynamic test of analogical reasoning. Intelligence, 41(3), 157-168.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.01.003" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.intell.2013.01.003</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Swanson, H. L. &amp; Howard, C. B. (2005). Children with reading disabilities: Does dynamic assessment help in the classification? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(1), 17-34.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/4126971" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/4126971</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Swanson, H. L., &amp; Lussier, C. M. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 321-363.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002321" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3102/00346543071002321</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Taub, G., Floyd, R. G., Keith, T. Z., &amp; McGrew, K. S. (2008). Effects of general and broad cognitive abilities on mathematics. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 187-198.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.2.187" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/1045-3830.23.2.187</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Taylor, T. R. (1992). Beyond competence: Measuring potential in a cross-cultural situation fairly. Potential in psychometrics. In Congress on psychometrics for psychologists. Megawatt Park, Sandton: Eskom and the Society of Industrial Psychology of South Africa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Tillman, C. M., Nyberg, L., &amp; Bohlin, G. (2008). Working memory components and intelligence in children. Intelligence, 36(5), 394-402.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.10.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.intell.2007.10.001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. Tzuriel, D. (2000). Dynamic assessment of young children: Educational and intervention perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 12(4), 385-435.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009032414088" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1023/A:1009032414088</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. Unsworth, N., &amp; Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 104-132.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. Unsworth, N., &amp; Spillers, G. J. (2010). Working memory capacity: Attention, memory, or both? A direct test of the Dual-Component Model. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 392-406.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-000" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/11193-000</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. West, R., Alain, C. (2000). Effects of task context and fluctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of the Stroop task. Brain Research, 873(1), 102-111.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02530-0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02530-0</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  74. Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T., Nelson, J. M., Clark, C. A., Chevalier, N., &amp; Espy, K. A. (2011). The structure of executive function in 3-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(3), 436-452.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.008" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.008</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  75. Wiedl, K. H. (1999). Cognitive modifiability as a measure of readiness for rehabilitation. Psychiatric Services, 50(11), 1411-1413.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.50.11.1411" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1176/ps.50.11.1411</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  76. Wiedl, K. H. (2003). Dynamic testing: A comprehensive model and current fields of application. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3(2), 93-119. journalofpedagogy1/2015<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1891/194589503787383055" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1891/194589503787383055</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  77. Wiedl, K. H., Schottke, H. H., &amp; Calero-Garcia, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of cognitive rehabilitation potential in schizophrenic persons and in elderly persons with and without dementia. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 112-117.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.17.2.112" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1027//1015-5759.17.2.112</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. Wiedl, K. H., &amp; Wienobst, J. (1999). Interindividual differences in cognitive remediation research with schizophrenic patients: Indicators of rehabilitation potential? International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 22(1), 55-59.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199903000-00007" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1097/00004356-199903000-00007</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2015-0002 | Journal eISSN: 1338-2144 | Journal ISSN: 1338-1563
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 41
Published on: Jul 24, 2015
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
fluid intelligence,
attentional control,
learning potential,
interaction effect.
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Education,
Education, other

© 2015 Marta Filičková, Ivan Ropovik, Monika Bobaková, Iveta Kovalčíková, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 6 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)Next article