References
- Anesa, P. (2011). Courtroom Discourses: An Analysis of the Westerfield Jury Trial: PhD Thesis. Verona: University of Verona.
- Aron, R., Fast, J., Klein, R.B. (1996) Trial Communication Skills. Deerfield, Ill.: Clark Boardman Callaghan.
- Atkinson, J.M., Drew, P. (1979) Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan. DOI: 10.2307/331175310.2307/3311753
- Bakhtin, M.M. (1979). Literaturno-kriticheskie stat'i. Moskva: Hudozhestvennaja literature.
- Bakhtin, M.M. (1981) The Dialogic imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI: 10.2307/206865910.2307/2068659
- Bornstein, B.H. (1999) The Ecological Validity of Jury Simulations: Is the Jury Still Out? In Law and Human Behavior, 23(1), pp. 75-91. DOI: 10.1023/a:102232680744110.1023/a:1022326807441
- Bray, R.M., Kerr, N.L. (1979) Use of the Simulation Method in the Study of Jury Behavior: Some Methodological Considerations. In Law and Human Behavior, 3, pp. 107-119
- Carnap, P. (1959). Meaning and necessity: studies in semantics and modal logic. Moscow: Izd-vo inostrannoi literatury. DOI: 10.2307/201921510.2307/2019215
- Chafe, W. (1982). Dannoe, kontrastivnost’, opredelennost’, podlezhashchcee itochka zreniya. In Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike, 11, pp. 277-317.
- Chiang, A.C. (1984). Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. DOI: 10.1016/0164-0704(84)90011-910.1016/0164-0704(84)90011-9
- Cotterill, J. (2003) Language and Power in Court: A Linguistic Analysis of the O.J. Simpson Trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI: 10.1558/ijsll.v11i2.29310.1558/ijsll.v11i2.293
- Danet, B. (1985). Legal Discourse. In van Dijk, T.A. (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 1. London: Academic Press, pp. 273-291. DOI: 10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.00002.x10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.00002.x
- Diamond, S.S. (1997) Illuminations and Shadows from Jury Simulations. In Law and Human Behavior, 21, pp. 561-571. DOI: 10.1023/a:102483190837710.1023/a:1024831908377
- Dubrovskaya, T.V. (2010). Sudebny diskurs: rechevoe povedenie sudji (na materiale russkogo i angliiskogo yazykov). Moskva: Akademiya.
- Eco, U. (1984). The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Indiana University Press. DOI: 10.2307/4013503710.2307/40135037
- Goodrich, P. (1984) Law and Language: An Historical and Critical Introduction. In Journal of Law and Society, 11(2), pp. 173-206. DOI: 10.2307/141003910.2307/1410039
- Green, J.P. (1976). All Men Are Created Equal: Some Reflections on the Character of the American Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: 10.3726/978-1-4539-1327-7/1410.3726/978-1-4539-1327-7/14
- Harris, S. (1984) Questions as a Mode of Control in Magistrates‘ Courts. In International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 49, pp. 5-28. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl.1984.49.510.1515/ijsl.1984.49.5
- Hastie, R., Penrod, S.D., Pennington, N. (1983) Inside the Jury. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Heffer, C. (2005). The Language of Jury Trial: A Corpus-aided Analysis of LegalLay Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1558/ijsll.v13i2.29310.1558/ijsll.2006.13.2.293
- Heffer, C. (2008). The Language and Communication of Jury Instructions. In Gibbons, J., Turell, M. T. (eds) Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Hintikka, Y. (1980). Logic and epistemological studies. Moscow: Progress.
- Holthoon, F. van, Olson, D. (1987). Common Sense: The Foundations for Social Science. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.
- Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the Reader. Addressee Features in Academic Articles. In Written Communication, 18 (4), pp. 549-574. DOI: 10.1177/0741088301018004005.10.1177/0741088301018004005
- Kaplunenko, A.M. (2012). Federal / Federalism: from the concept to the term. Semiotic evolution of the nomination ‘Federal / Feeralism’. In Vestnik of Irkutsk State Linguistic University, 2(18), pp. 16-21.
- Khutyz, I.P. (2012). Signaly interaktivnosti v akademicheskom diskurse: inklusivnye mestoimeniya. In Vestnik of Maikop State Technological University, 3, pp. 64-68.
- Koni, A.F. (1966). Iz zapisok sudebnogo deyatelya. Tom 1. Prisazhnye zasedateli. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literature.
- Krapivkina, O.A. (2014). Pronominal choice in academic discourse. In Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 20 (7), pp. 833-843. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.20.07.1367610.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.20.07.13676
- Krapivkina, O.A. (2017). Analysis of discourses as forms of social interaction (Case study of court shows). In Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Filologiya, 46, pp. 21-30. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/46/210.17223/19986645/46/2
- Kripke, S. (1963). Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic. In Acta philosophica fennica, 16, pp. 83-94. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0346-0145-0_1610.1007/978-3-0346-0145-0_16
- Kubryakova, E.S. (2004). Yazyk i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znanii o yazyke: Chasti rechi s kognitivnoi tochki zreniya. Rol’ yazyka v poznanii mira. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kultury.
- Lewis, D. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Lubet, S. (2004). Modern Trial Advocacy: Analysis and Practice. South Bend, Indiana: National Institute for Trial Advocacy.
- Matoesian, G. (2001). Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1177/09579265050160011010.1177/095792650501600110
- Mauet, T.A. (2009). Trials: Strategy, Skills, and the New Powers of Persuasion. New York: Aspen Publishers.
- McMenamin, G. (2002) Forensic Linguistics: Advances in Forensic Stylistics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
- Mellinkoff, D. (1963) The Language of the Law. Boston: Little Brown & Co.
- Olsson, J. (2004). Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language, Crime and the Law. London: Continuum. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2008.000510.1353/lan.2008.0005
- Palashevskaya I.V. (2012). Courtroom discourse: Functions, structure, nattativeness. Volgograd:Volgograd State Social and Educational University.
- Philips, S.U. (1987). The Social Organisation of Questions and Answers in Courtroom Discourse. In Kedar, L. (ed.) Power through Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 83-112. DOI: 10.2307/41458510.2307/414585
- Plantinga, A. 1976. Actualism and possible worlds. In Theoria, 42, pp.139-160. DOI: 10.1093/0195103769.003.0006.10.1093/0195103769.003.0006
- Ryan M.L. (2013). Possible worlds [online]. Accessible from: http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/possible-worlds
- Stalnaker, R.S. (1985). Pragmatics. In Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike, 16, pp. 115-125.
- Swales, J.M. (1990) Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Swales, J.M. (2016). Reflections on the concept of discourse community. In Concepts and Frameworks in English for Specific Purposes, 69, pp. 1-12. DOI: 10.4000/asp.477410.4000/asp.4774
- Whitehead, A.N. (1990). Selected works in philosophy. Moscow: Progress.