The impact of personality and self-efficacy on academic and military performance: The mediating role of self-efficacy

Fosse, Thomas Hol; Buch, Robert; Säfvenbom, Reidar; Martinussen, Monica

doi:10.1515/jms-2016-0197

Abstract

In order to optimize recruitment and the overall outcome of educational programmes, it is crucial to understand personal determinants of achievement. While several cognitive abilities and skills individually predict performance in academic and professional settings, it is less clear how personality translates into performance. This study addresses the impact of the Big Five personality trait, conscientiousness, on academic performance and instructor performance ratings and examines the mediating role of self-efficacy. Analysis of longitudinal data (Time 1: n = 166 (conscientiousness); Time 2: n = 161 (self-efficacy); Time 3: n = 136 (military performance) and n = 156 (academic performance)) from three military academies in Norway showed that conscientiousness was related to both military and academic performance. Moreover, self-efficacy emerged as a partial mediator for the relationship between conscientiousness and performance.

References

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-78). New York: Academic Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bandura, A. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory of Personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality. Theory and Research (2 ed., pp. 154-196). New York The Guilford Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bandura, A. (2012). On the Functional Properties of Perceived Self-Efficacy Revisited. Journal of Management, 38(9), 9-44. 10.1177/0149206311410606
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator - Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personel psychology, 44, 1-26. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9 (1/2), 9-30. 10.1111/1468-2389.00160
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, S. D., Lent, R. W., Telander, K., & Tramayne, S. (2011). Social cognitive career theory, conscientiousness, and work performance: A meta-analytic path analyses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.11.009
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buch, R., Säfvenbom, R., & Boe, O. (2015). The relationships between academic self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and perceived competence. Journal of Military Studies, 6(1), 1-17. 10.1515/jms-2016-0195
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burns, G. N., & Christiansen, N. D. (2011). Self-efficacy in the Workplace: Linking personality to domain-specific efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19 (4. December 2011). 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00570.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Caprara, Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Perugini, M. (1993). The "Big Five Questionnaire": a new questionnaire to assess the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 281-288. 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90218-R
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Caprara, Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, G. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 78-96. doi: 10.1348/2044-8279.002004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chappelle, W., Novy, P. L., Sowin, T. W., & Thompson, W. T. (2010). NEO PI-R Normative Personality Data That Distinguish U.S. Air Force Female Pilots. Military Psychology, 22, 158-175. 10.1080/08995600903417308
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cohen, J. (1992). A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Congard, A., Antoine, P., & Gilles, P.-Y. (2012). Assessing the strctural and Psychometric Properties of a New Personality Measure for Use With Military Personel in the French Armed Forces. Military Psychology, 24, 284-307. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2012.678242
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dinther, M. v., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6, 95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Engvik, H., & Føllesdal, H. (2005). The Big Five Inventory in Norwegian. Journal of the Norwegian Psychological Association, 42, 129-130.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Feyter, T. D., Caers, R., Vigna, C., & Berings, D. (2012). Unraveling the impact of Big Five personality traits on academic performance: The moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy and academic motivation. Learning and individual Differences, 22, 439-448. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.013
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466-491. 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233-239. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Giunta, L. D., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., Kanacri, P. L., Zuffiano, A., & Caprara, G. V. (2013). The determinants of scholastic achievement: The contribution of personality traits, self-esteem, and academic self-efficacy. Learning and individual Differences, 27, 102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2005). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Horn, P. S. V., Green, K. E., & Martinussen, M. (2009). Survey Response Rates and Survey Administration in Counseling and Clinical Psychology: A Meta-Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 389-403. doi: 10.1177/0013164408324462
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. 10.1080/10705519909540118
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2003). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johansen, R. B., Laberg, J. C., & Martinussen, M. (2013). Military Identity as Predictor of Perceived Military Competence and Skills Armed Forces & Society. 10.1177/0095327X13478405
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of Personality to Peformance Motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 797-807. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.793
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Judge, T. A., Ilies, R., Bono, J. E., & Gerhardt, M. w. (2002). Personality and Leadership: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765-780. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.765
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., & Rich, B. A. S. a. B. L. (2007). Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: The Intregral Role of Individual Differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107-127. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jöreskog, K. G. (2005). Structural Equation Modeling with Ordinal Variables using LISREL. Technical documents., from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ordinal.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the Number of Variables on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(3), 333-351. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., & Dysvik, A. (2014). Performance Management: Perceiving Goals as Invariable and Implications for Perceived Job Autonomy and Work Performance. . Human Resource Management, n/a(n/a). doi: 10.1002/hrm.21680
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martin, J. H., Montgomery, R. L., & Saphian, D. (2006). Personality, achievement test scores and high school percentile as predictors of academic performance across four years of coursework. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 424-431. 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.02.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martocchio, J., & Judge, T. A. (1997). Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: Mediating influences on self-deception and self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(764-773). 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.764
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCormack, L., & Mellor, D. (2002). The Role of Personality in Leadership: An application of the Fice-Factor Model in the Australian Military. Military Psychology, 14(3), 179-197. 10.1207/S15327876MP1403_1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1986). Personality stability and its implications for clinical psychology. ClinicalPsychology Review, 6, 407-423. 10.1016/0272-7358(86)90029-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality (2 ed.). New York: The Guilford press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1998). Reconciling prcessing dynamics and personality dispositions. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 229-258. 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.229
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to aademic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30-38. 10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Muthén, B. O., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Conditionallly accepted for publication in Psychometrika.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. 10.3102/00346543066004543
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-Analysis of the Five-Factor Model of Personality and Academic Performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322-338. doi: 10.1037/a0014996
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological Correlates of University Students´ Performance: A systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353-387. doi: 10.1037/a0026838
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrøm, A. (2004). Do psycholsocial and study skils factors predict college outcomes? A meta analysis Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261-288. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Salgado, J. F. (1998). Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance in Army and Civil Occupations: A European Perspective. Human Performance, 11(2/3), 271-288. 10.1207/s15327043hup1102&;3_8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sellman, W. S., Born, D. H., Stricland, W. J., & Ross, J. J. (2010). Selection and Classification in the U.S. Military. In J. L. Farr & N. T. Tippins (Eds.), Employee Selection (pp. 679-699). New York Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shamir, E. (2011). Transforming Command. The Pursuit of Mission Command in the U.S, British and Israeli Armies. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9780804777704
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and Work-Related Performance: A Meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261. 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Søgaard, A., Selmer, R., Bjertness, E., & Thelle, D. (2004). The Oslo health study: the impact of self selection in a large, population-based survey. International Journal for equity in Health, 2004(3:3), Retrieved Aug 7, 2015 from http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/2013/2011/2013. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-3-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tabak, F., Nguyen, N., Basuray, T., & Darrow, W. (2009). Exploring the impact of personality on performance: how time-on-task moderates the mediation by self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 823-828. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.027
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: a meta-analytic review. Personel psychology, 1991(44), 703-742. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00696.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Viswesvaran, C. (2001). Assessment of individual job performance: A review of the past century and a look ahead. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, workd and organizational psychology: Vol. 1. Personnel psychology (pp. 110-126). London: Sage. 10.4135/9781848608320.n7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495. doi: 10.2307/258554
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197-206. 10.1086/651257
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The impact of personality and self-efficacy on academic and military performance: The mediating role of self-efficacy

Abstract

Paradigm

My account