Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of winter food quality and its variability for red deer in forest environment: overwintering enclosures vs. free-ranging areas Cover

Evaluation of winter food quality and its variability for red deer in forest environment: overwintering enclosures vs. free-ranging areas

Open Access
|Dec 2016

References

  1. AOAC, 1984: Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington.
  2. Appleby, M. C., 1980: Social rank and food access in red deer stags. Behaviour, 74:294–309.
  3. Apollonio, M., Andersen, R., Putman R. (eds.), 2010: European Ungulates and Their Management in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  4. Asada, M., Ochiai, K., 1999: Nitrogen content in feces and the diet of Sika deer on the Bose Peninsula, central Japan. Ecological Research, 14:249–253.
  5. Barnes, R. J., Dhanoa, M. S., Lister, S. J., 1989: Standard normal variate transformation and de-trending of near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra. Applied Spectroscopy, 43:772–772.
  6. Belovsky, G. E., 1981: Food plant selection by a generalist herbivore: the moose. Ecology, 62:1020–1030.
  7. Carpio, A. J., Guerrero-Casado, J., Ruiz-Aizpurua, L., Tortosa, F. S., Vicente, J., 2015: Interpreting faecal nitrogen as a non-invasive indicator of diet quality and body condition in contexts of high ungulate density. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 61:557–562.
  8. Christianson, D. A., Creel, S., 2007: A Review of Environmental Factors Affecting Elk Winter Diets. Journal of Wildlife Management, 76:164–176.
  9. Clutton-Brock, T.H., Albon, S.D., 1985: Competition and population regulation in social mammals. In: Sibly, R. M., Smith, R. H. (eds.): Behavioural ecology. Oxford Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, p. 557–576.
  10. Côté, S. D., Rooney, T. P., Tremblay, J. P., Dussault, Ch., Waller, D.M., 2004: Ecological Impacts of Deer Overabundance. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 35:113–147.
  11. Crawley, M. J., 1997. Plant Ecology. Second Edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  12. Dixon, R., Coates, D., 2009: Review: Near infrared spectroscopy of faeces to evaluate the nutrition and physiology of herbivores. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 17:1–31.
  13. Foley, W. J., McIlwee, A., Lawler, I., Aragones, L., Woolnough, A.P., Berding, N., 1998: Ecological applications of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy-a tool for rapid, cost-effective prediction of the composition of plant and animal tissues and aspects of animal performance. Oecologia, 116:293–305.
  14. Forsyth, D. M., Richardson, S. J., Menchenton, K., 2005: Foliar fibre predicts diet selection by invasive Red Deer Cervus elaphus scoticus in a temperate New Zeland forest. Functional Ecology, 19:495–504.
  15. Gebert, C., Verheyden-Tixier, H., 2001: Variations of diet composition of Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in Europe. Mammal Review, 31:3–4.
  16. Hodgman, T. P., Davitt, B. B., Nelson, J. R., 1996: Monitoring mule deer diet quality and intake with fecal indices. Journal of Range Management, 49:215–222.
  17. Holá, M., 2012: Spatial and Temporal Variation in the Quality of Summer Foods for Herbivores along a Latitudinal Gradient. MSc. Thesis, Faculty of Forestry, Dept. of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 33 p.
  18. Holechek, J. L., Vavra, M., Pieper, R. D., 1982a: Botanical composition determination of range herbivore diets-a review. Journal of Range Management, 35:309–315.
  19. Holechek, J. L., Vavra, M., Arthun, D., 1982b: Relationships between performance, intake, diet nutritive quality and fecal nutritive quality of cattle on mountain range. Journal of Range Management, 35:741–744.
  20. Iason, G., 2005: The role of plant secondary metabolites in mammalian herbivory: ecological perspectives. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 64:123–131.
  21. Kamler, J., Homolka, M., Čižmár, D., 2004: Suitability of NIRS analysis for estimating diet quality of free-living red deer Cervus elaphus and roe deer Capreolus capreolus. Wildlife Biology, 10: 235–240.
  22. Krojerová-Prokešová, J., Barančeková, M., Šustr, P., Heurich, M., 2010: Feeding patterns of red deer Cervus elaphus along an altitudinal gradient in the Bohemian Forest: effect of habitat and season. Wildlife Biology, 16:173–184.
  23. Leslie, D. M., Starkey, E. E., 1985: Fecal indices to dietary quality of cervids in old-growth forests. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 49:142–146.
  24. Leslie, D. M., Bowyer, R. T., Jenks, J. A., 2008: Facts From Feces: Nitrogen Still Measures Up as a Nutritional Index for Mammalian Herbivores. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 7:1420–1433.
  25. Massei, G., Genov, P. V., 2004: The environmental impact of wild boar. Galemys, 16:135–145.
  26. Palo, R. T., Robbins, C. T. (ed.), 1991: Plant Defenses Against Mammalian Herbivory. CRC Press. Inc. Boca Raton, Florida.
  27. Parker, K. L., Barboza, P. S., Gillingham, M. P., 2009: Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates. Functional Ecology, 23:57–69.
  28. Pepin, D., Renaud, P. C., Boscardin, Y., Goulard, M., Mallet, C., Anglard, F. et al. 2006: Relative impact of browsing by red deer on mixed coniferous and broad-leaved seedlings – An enclosure-based experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 222:302–313.
  29. Pettorelli, N., Dray, S., Gaillard, J.-M., Chessel, D., Duncan, P., Illius, A. et al., 2003: Spatial variation in springtime food resources influences the winter body mass of roe deer fawns. Oecologia, 137:363–369.
  30. Putman, R. J., Staines, B. W., 2004: Supplementary winter feeding of wild red deer Cervus elaphus in Europe and North America: justifications, feeding practice an effectiveness. Mammal Review, 34:285–306.
  31. R Core Team, 2014: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.0.3 [computer program]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Available: http:/www.R-project.org; 2014. Accessed 10 April 2014.
  32. Robbins, C. T., 1993: Wildlife Feeding and Nutrition. Second Edition. Academic Press, San Diego.
  33. Sams, M. G., Lochmiller, R. L., Qualls, C. W., Leslie, D. M., 1998: Sensitivity of condition indices to changing density in a white-tailed deer population. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 34:110–125.
  34. Shenk, J. S., Westerhaus, M. O., 1991: New standardization and calibration procedures for near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Crop Science, 31:469–474.
  35. Shepherd, K. D., Walsh, M. G., 2007: Infrared spectroscopy: Enabling an evidence-based diagnostic surveillance approach to agricultural and environmental management in developing countries. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 15:1–19.
  36. Showers, S. E., Tolleson, D. R., Stuth, J. W., Kroll, J. C., Koerth, B. H., 2006: Predicting diet quality of white-tailed deer via NIRS fecal profiling. Rangeland Ecology & Management., 59:300–307.
  37. Suzuki, M., Miyashita, T., Kabaya, H., Ochiai, K., Asada, M., Tange, T., 2008: Deer density affects ground-layer vegetation differently in conifer plantations and hardwood forests on the Boso Peninsula, Japan. Ecological Research, 23:151–158.
  38. Thouless, C. R., 1990: Feeding competition between grazing red deer hinds. Animal Behaviour, 40:105–111.
  39. Van Beest, F. M., Mysterud, A., Loe, L. E., Milner, J. M., 2010: Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scale-dependent mechanism driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore. Journal of Animal Ecology, 79:910–922.
  40. Van Soest, P. J., 1994: Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, 2nd ed. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
  41. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., Lewis, B. A., 1991: Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74:3583–3597.
  42. Vojta, J., Kopecký, M., 2006: Vegetation of secondary forests and shrubs in Doupovské hory hills. Zprávy České botanické společnosti, Praha, 21:209–225.
  43. Weisberg, P. J., Bugmann, H., 2003: Forest dynamics and ungulate herbivory: from leaf to landscape. Forest Ecology and Management, 181:1–12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/forj-2016-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2454-0358 | Journal ISSN: 2454-034X
Language: English
Page range: 139 - 145
Published on: Dec 8, 2016
Published by: National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Michaela Holá, Miloš Ježek, Tomáš Kušta, Jaroslav Červený, published by National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.