Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
AirBaltic Case Based Analysis of Potential for Improving Employee Engagement Levels in Latvia through Gamification Cover

AirBaltic Case Based Analysis of Potential for Improving Employee Engagement Levels in Latvia through Gamification

By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2016

References

  1. airBaltic Intranet. (2015). about airBaltic. Retrieved from Intra.Airbaltic.com.
  2. Aparicio, A., Vela, F., Sánchez, J., & Montes, J. (2012). Analysis and application of gamification. Elche, Alicante, Spain. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2379636.237965310.1145/2379636.2379653
  3. Badgeville. (2015). Game Mechanics. Retrieved from Badgeville.com: https://badgeville.com/products/gamification
  4. Bartle, R. (1996, August 28). HEARTS, CLUBS, DIAMONDS, SPADES: PLAYERS WHO SUIT MUDS. Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom.
  5. Bunchball. (2015, June 1). Nitro Gamification Platform. Retrieved from Bunchball. com: http://www.bunchball.com/products/nitro
  6. Cook, W. (2013). 5 reasons you can’t ignore gamification. Newton: Inward Strategic Consulting.
  7. Czikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harpen & Row.
  8. Deci, E., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivations in education: reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654307100100110.3102/00346543071001001
  9. Deterding, S. (2011). Situated motivational affordances of game elements: a conceptual model. Vancouver, Canada: CHI 2011.
  10. Deterding, S. (2012). Gamification: designing for motivation. Interactions, 14-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2212877.221288310.1145/2212877.2212883
  11. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khalad, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September 28-30). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining Gamification. Mindtrek. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2181037.218104010.1145/2181037.2181040
  12. Dixon, D. (2011). Player types and gamification. Vancouver: CHI.
  13. Fogg, B. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. California: Persuasive Technology Lab, Stanford University. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1541948.154199910.1145/1541948.1541999
  14. Ghafele, R., & Gibert, B. (2011). Crowdsourcing patent application review: leveraging new opportunities to capitalize on innovation? Intellectual Property Quarterly, 23-33, No. 3.
  15. Ghani, J., & Deshpande, S. (1994). Tasks characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. The journal of psychology, 381-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1994.971274210.1080/00223980.1994.9712742
  16. Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2013). Social motivations to use gamification: an empirical study of gamifying exercise. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on information systems. Utrecht.
  17. Han, T., Chiang, H., & Chang, C. (2010). Employee participation in decision making, psychological ownership and knowledge sharing: mediating role of organizational commitment in Taiwanese high-tech organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(12), 2218-2233.10.1080/09585192.2010.509625
  18. Harvard business school analytical review. (2013). The impact of employee engagment on performance. London: Harvard business review publisher.
  19. Higgins, A. (2014, July 16). 3 Examples of gamification in the workplace. Retrieved from Concur.com: https://www.concur.com/blog/en-us/3-examples-of-gamification-in-the-workplace
  20. Huatari, K., & Hamari, J. (2012). Defining gamification - a service marketing perspective. Presented at MindTrek’12. (pp. 17-22). Proceedings of the 16 the International Academic Mind Trek Conference.10.1145/2393132.2393137
  21. Institute of Employment Studies. (2004). Report Summary: The drivers of employee engagement. Retrieved July 7.
  22. Nicholson, S. (2012). A User-centered theoretical framework for meaningful gamification. Games + learning + Society (pp. 1-7). Madison, WI: School of Information Studies, Syracuse University
  23. Robson, K., Plangger, K., Kietzmann, J., McCarthy, I., & Pitt, L. (2015). Is it al a game? Understanding the principles of gamification. Elsevier.
  24. Ryan, R., Rigby, C., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self Determination Approach. Motiv Emot, Springer Science, 347-363.10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8
  25. Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: Asurvey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.00610.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
  26. Shayon, S. (2013b, June 13). Gamification with new aviation empire game. Retrieved from Brandchannel.com: http://brandchannel.com/2013/06/13/klm-readies-full-on-social-gamification-with-new-aviation-empire-game/
  27. Speckund. (2015). Gartner Hype Cycle of Emerging Technologies, Hypes und Trends für 2014 / 2015. Retrieved May 8, 2015, from speckund.ch: http://speckund.ch/2/gartner-hype-cycle-emerging-technologies-2014-2015/
  28. TNS. (2015). airbaltic corporation TRI*M Employee Commitment Survey.
  29. Riga: TNS.
  30. Villaroel, J., & Reis, F. (2011). A stock Market Approach to Online Distributed Innovation: the Trade-off between Speculation and Innovation Performance.
  31. Workshop on social computing and user generated content ACM-EC’11, (pp. 1-5). San Jose.
  32. Werback, K. (2014). (Re)Defining Gamification: A Process Approach. Persuasive Technology: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 266-272. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_2310.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_23
  33. Xu, Y. (2011). Literature review on web application gamification and analytics. Honolulu: Collaborative Software Development Lab, University of Hawai.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2016-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2256-0394 | Journal ISSN: 1407-7337
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 51
Published online: Jun 10, 2016
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Daiga Ērgle, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.