Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effects of Contextual Factors on ESD in Teacher Education Cover
By: Çağla Atmaca  
Open Access
|Jan 2018

References

  1. Ates, D., Teksöz, G., & Ertepınar, H. (2017). Exploring the role of future perspective in predicting Turkish university students’ beliefs about global climate change. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Development, 8(1), 32–52.10.1515/dcse-2017-0003
  2. Aslandağ Soylu, B., Yanpar Yelken, T., & Külekci, M. K. (2016). Evaluating lifewide learning habits of academicians for sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 132–143. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-002110.1515/dcse-2016-0021
  3. Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M., & Stoltenberg, U. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 416–430.10.1108/14676370710823582
  4. Burns, S. N., & Grove, S. K. (2003). Understanding nursing research. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Saunders.
  5. Corte, M. V., den Broka, P., Kamp, M., & Bergen, T. (2013). Teacher research in Dutch professional development schools: Perceptions of the actual and preferred situation in terms of the context, process and outcomes of research. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(1), 3–23.10.1080/02619768.2012.662639
  6. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousands Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
  7. Çoklar, A. N., & Kabakçi. Yurdakul, I. (2017). Technology Integration Experiences of Teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(1), 19–31.10.1515/dcse-2017-0002
  8. de Haan, G. (2006). The BLK ‘21’ programme in Germany: a ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’-based model for education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 1, 19–32.10.1080/13504620500526362
  9. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) P9 Eurydice. (2009). Indicators on initial teacher education (extracted from Key Data on Education).
  11. Fernet, C., Trépanier, S. G., Austin, S., & Levesque-Côté, J. (2016). Committed, inspiring, and healthy teachers: How do school environment and motivational factors facilitate optimal functioning at career start? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 481–491.10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.019
  12. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1980). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (11th ed.). New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
  13. Gholami, J., & Qurbanzada, I. (2016). Key stakeholders’ attitudes towards teacher education programs in TEFL: a case study of Farhangian university in Iran. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 5–20. doi: 10.1515/jtes-2016-001110.1515/jtes-2016-0011
  14. Grayson, J. L., & Alvarez, H. K. (2008). School climate factors relating to teacher burn-out: A mediator model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1349–1363.10.1016/j.tate.2007.06.005
  15. Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205. doi: 10.3102/000283120731290610.3102/0002831207312906
  16. Hiller, K., & Reichart, B. (2017). Motivation of civic education teachers-in-training in the field of education for sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Development, 8(1), 81–89.10.1515/dcse-2017-0006
  17. Iliško, Dz. (2007). Teachers as agents of societal change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 7, 14–26.10.2478/v10099-009-0002-9
  18. Ingvarson, L., Beavis, A., & Kleinhenz, E. (2007). Factors affecting the impact of teacher education programmes on teacher preparedness: implications for accreditation policy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(4), 351–381. doi: 10.1080/0261976070166415110.1080/02619760701664151
  19. Kilgore, K., Griffin, C., Otis-Wilborn, A., & Winn, J. (2003). The problems of beginning special education teachers: Exploring the contextual factors influencing their work. Action in Teacher Education, 25(1), 38–47. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2003.1046329110.1080/01626620.2003.10463291
  20. Knoblauch, D., & Hoy, A. W. (2008). “Maybe I can teach those kids.” The influence of contextual factors on student teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 166–179.10.1016/j.tate.2007.05.005
  21. Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279–299.10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826
  22. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publication.
  23. Naylor, D. A., Campbell-Evans, G., & Maloney, C. (2015). Learning to teach: What do pre-service teachers report. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(11), 120–136.10.14221/ajte.2015v40n11.7
  24. Pehkonen, E., & Turner, G. (1999). Teachers’ professional development: What are the key change factors for mathematics teachers? European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(2–3), 259–275.10.1080/0261976899020259
  25. Pipere, A. (2016). Envisioning complexity: Towards a new conceptualization of educational research for sustainability. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 68–91. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-001710.1515/dcse-2016-0017
  26. Salīte, I. (2015). Searching for sustainability in teacher education and educational research: Experiences from the Baltic and Black Sea Circle Consortium for educational research. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 6, 21–29.10.1515/dcse-2015-0002
  27. Sahin, E. (2016). Delving into key dimensions of ESD through analyses of a middle school science textbook. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 34–42. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-001410.1515/dcse-2016-0014
  28. Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010). Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 482–496.10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.007
  29. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (Eds). (1998). Basics of qualitative research, techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London, CA: Sage Publications.
  30. Sundh, S. (2016). Corpus of young learners’ English in the Baltic region n texts for studies on sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 92–104. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-001810.1515/dcse-2016-0018
  31. Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243–259.10.1080/00313831.2011.581686
  32. Williams, D. L., Edwards, B., & Kuhel, K. A. (2016). Culturally responsive dispositions in prospective mathematics teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 17–33. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-001310.1515/dcse-2016-0013
Language: English
Page range: 77 - 93
Published on: Jan 11, 2018
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Çağla Atmaca, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.