Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Perceived Affordances, Tensions, and Complementarities in the Physical and Digital Environments Frequented by Future Teachers Cover

Perceived Affordances, Tensions, and Complementarities in the Physical and Digital Environments Frequented by Future Teachers

Open Access
|Jun 2016

References

  1. Alvarez, P., & Vega, P. (2004). Formacion inicial del profesorado en educacion ambiental [Environmental education in pre-service teacher training]. Revista Biocenosis [Journal Biocenosis], 18(1–2), 66–71.
  2. Álvarez-García, O., Sureda-Negre, J. & Comas-Forgas, R. (2015). Environmental education in pre-service teacher training: A literature review of existing evidence. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(1), 72–85.10.1515/jtes-2015-0006
  3. Arendt, R. (1996). Conservation design for subdivision: A practical guide for creating open space networks. Washington: Island Press.
  4. Akyildiz, M. & Argan, M. (2012). Using online social networking: Students’ purposes of Facebook usage at the University of Turkey. Journal of Technology Research, 3(1), 3–11.
  5. Arnold, H. E., Cohen, F. G., & Warner, A. (2009). Youth and environmental action: Perspectives of young environmental leaders on their formative influences. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 27–36.10.3200/JOEE.40.3.27-36
  6. Barnes, K., Marateo, R. C., & Ferris, P. S. (2007). Teaching and learning with the Net Generation. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 3.
  7. Bicen, H. & Cavus, N. (2011). Social network sites usage habits of undergraduate students: Case study of Facebook. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 943–947.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.174
  8. Boubée, N. (2011). Caractériser les pratiques informationnelles des jeunes: Les problèmes laissés ouverts par les deux conceptions. “Natifs” et “naïfs” numériques. [Characterizing the information practices of young people: The problems left open by the two designs. “Native” and “naïve” digital]. Retrieved April 1, 2016, from http://www.cndp.fr/savoirscdi/fileadmin/fichiers_auteurs/Actes/Rennes_2011/NBRencontresSavoirsCDI-oct2011.pdf
  9. Chawla, L. (2006). Research methods to investigate significant life experiences: Review and recommendations. Environmental Education Research, 12, 359–374.10.1080/13504620600942840
  10. Chow, K. & Healey, M. (2008). Place attachment and place identity: First year undergraduates making the transition to the university. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 362–372.10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.011
  11. Cuba, L. & Hummon, D. M. (1993). A place to call home: Identification with dwelling, community and region. The Sociological Quarterly, 34, 111–131.10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00133.x
  12. Dorman, S. M. (2000). Implications of growing up digital. Review of Tapscott’s growing up digital. The Journal of School Health, 70, 420–422.10.1111/j.1746-1561.2000.tb07232.x
  13. Doğruer, N., Meneviş, I., & Eyyam, R. (2011). What is the motivation for using Facebook? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2642–2646.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.162
  14. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw and J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing (pp. 142–159). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
  15. Feiertag, J. & Berge, Z. L. (2008). Training generation N: How educators should approach the Net Generation. Education + Training, 50, 457–464.10.1108/00400910810901782
  16. Fuller, R. A., McDonald-Madden, E., Wilson, K. A., Carwardine, J., Grantham, H. S., Watson, J. E. M., Klein, C. J., Green, D. C., & Possingham, H. P. (2010). Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes. Nature, 466, 365–367.10.1038/nature09180
  17. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw and J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing (pp. 142–159). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
  18. Glaser, B. G. (2007). Doing formal grounded theory: A proposal. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  19. Hopkins, R. (2008). The Transition handbook: From oil dependency to local resilience. Cambridge, UK: Green Books.
  20. Hummon, D. M. (1992). Community attachment. In I. Altman and S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 253–278). New York: Plenum Press.
  21. Iliško, D., Skrinda, A. & Mičule, I. (2014). Envisioning the future: Bachelor’s and Masters’ degree students’ perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(2), 88–102.10.2478/jtes-2014-0013
  22. Junco, R. (2013). Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 626–631.10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.007
  23. Lardellier, P. & Bryon-Portet, C. (2010). Ego 2.0. Quelques considérations théoriques sur l’identité et les relations à l’ère des réseaux [Some theoretical considerations about identity and relationships in the network age] Les Cahiers du Numériques, 1, 13–34.
  24. Larsen, M. C. & Ryberg, T. (2011). Youth and online social networking: From local experiences to public discourse. In E. Dunkels, G.-M. Franberg, and C. Hallgren (Eds.), Youth culture and net culture: Online social practices (pp. 17–40). New York: Information Science Reference.
  25. Malmberg, T. (1992). Time and space in human ecology. In R. M. Dubey (Ed.), Human ecology and environmental education (pp. 29–60). Allshabad, India: Chugh Publications.
  26. Margitay-Becht, A. & Herrera, D. R. (2012). Immersion and connectivity: How goal-oriented fun can foster self-motivation. Presentation at the Conference Connectivity in the 21st Century, Salzburg, Austria.
  27. Martinovic, D. & Freiman, V. (2011). Child and youth development beyond age 6 – Transitions to digitally literate adults. Presentation for Ministry of Child and Youth Services, Toronto, ON, Feb 11.
  28. McAndrew, T. F. & Jeong, S. H. (2012). Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2359–2365.10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.007
  29. McLachlan, J. S., Hellmann, J. J., & Schwartz, M. W. (2007). A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conservation Biology, 21(2), 297–302.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00676.x
  30. Nadkarni, A. & Hofmann, S. G. (2011). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249.10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007
  31. Oblinger, D. & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the Net generation. In D. G. Oblinger and J. L. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation (pp. 2.1–2.2). Boulder, CO: Educause.
  32. Oblinger, D. (2008). Growing up with Google: What it means to education. Emerging Technologies for Learning, 3(1), 11–29.
  33. O’Brien, C. (2013). Who is teaching us about sustainable happiness and well-being? Health, Culture and Society, 5(1), 294–307.10.5195/HCS.2013.122
  34. Paillé, P. & Mucchielli, A. (2008). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. [Qualitative analysis in the social sciences] Paris: Armand Colin.
  35. Pletka, B. (2007). Educating the net generation. Santa Monica, CA: Santa Monica Press.
  36. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83.10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8
  37. Pruneau, D. (1995). Conception et expérimentation d’un processus de formation en cours d’emploi destiné à inciter les enseignants du préscolaire et du primaire à agir en éducation relative à l’environnement. [Education designed to encourage preschool and primary school teachers to act in environmental education] Doctoral thesis, Quebec: Université Laval.
  38. Pruneau, D., Gravel, H., & Ouattara, I. (2002). Les relations que les adolescents entretiennent avec leur environnement. Revue des sciences de l’éducation. [The relationship that teens have with their environment]. 28(3), 565–586.
  39. Puk, T., & Stibbards, A. (2010). Ecological concept development of pre-service teacher candidates: Opaque empty shells. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(4), 461–476.
  40. Register, R. (2006). EcoCities: Rebuilding cities in balance with nature. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
  41. Rollero, C. & De Piccoli, N. (2010). Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 198–205.10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.12.003
  42. Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 402–407.10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009
  43. Tapscott, D. (1999). Educating the Net generation. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 6–11.
  44. Thomashow, M. (1995). Ecological identity: Becoming a reflective environmentalist. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  45. Tosun, P. L. (2012). Motives for Facebook use and expressing “true self” on the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1510–1526.10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.018
  46. Yang, C. & Brown, B. B. (2013). Motives for using Facebook, patterns of Facebook activities, and late adolescents’ social adjustment to college. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(3), 403–416.10.1007/s10964-012-9836-x
  47. Zecha, S. (2013). Significant influences on nature experiences: A comparative study of Southern German and Northern Spanish Pupils Aged 14 and 15. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 4, 23–42.
Language: English
Page range: 68 - 81
Published on: Jun 8, 2016
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Diane Pruneau, Jackie Kerry, Viktor Freiman, Joanne Langis, Mohamed Bizid, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.