Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces Cover

Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces

Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. Advares-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., (2006). Social identity and the recognition of creativity in groups. The British journal of social psychology, 45(3), 479-497.10.1348/014466605X50184
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1982). The social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997-1013.10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
  3. Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14.10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.14
  4. Peppler, K., Bender, S., & Catterall, J. (2015). Learning and achieving through the arts: A collaborative project of inner-city arts and Los Angeles Unified School District 4 (Deliverable to the U.S. Department of Education). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
  5. Baer, J. (2010). Is creativity domain specific?. In the (Eds) J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165-182.10.1207/S15326985EP3703_3
  7. Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 113-117.10.1207/s15326934crj1601_11
  8. Baer, J., & McKool, S. S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment technique. In Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education (pp. 65-77). IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-60566-667-9.ch004
  9. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53-69.10.1080/13598139.2014.905247
  10. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.10.1007/BF02310555
  11. Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and psychological measurement, 64(3), 391-418.10.1177/0013164404266386
  12. Csikszentmihalyi M. (1988). Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity. In: The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht
  13. Furman, A. (1998). Teacher and pupil characteristics in the perception of the creativity of classroom climate. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(4), 258-277.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00821.x
  14. Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationship between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7(2), 193-208.10.1080/10400419409534524
  15. Hickey, M. (2001). An application of Amabile’s consensual assessment technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(3), 234-24410.2307/3345709
  16. Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G., & Britz, A. (2001). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171-184.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_5
  17. Issacharoff, M. (1981). Space and reference in drama. Poetics Today, 2(3), 211-224.10.2307/1772472
  18. Johnson, C. (2004). Creativity in drama: thinking from within. In R. Fisher & M. Williams (Eds.), Unlocking creativity: Teaching across the curriculum. London: David Fulton Publishers.
  19. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.10.1177/1558689806298224
  20. Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 171-178.10.1080/10400410802059929
  21. Kaufman, J. C., Lee, J., Baer, J., & Lee, S. (2007). Captions, consistency, creativity, and the consensual assessment technique: New evidence of reliability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(2), 96-106.10.1016/j.tsc.2007.04.002
  22. LeBlanc, A., Jin, Y. C., Obert, M., & Siivola, C. (1997). Effect of audience on music performance anxiety. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(3), 480-496.10.2307/3345541
  23. Llewelyn-Jones, L. (2002). Understanding theater space. In Essays on documenting and researching productions of Greek drama: The sources.
  24. Nachmanovitch, S. (1990). Free play: Improvisation in life and art. Penguin.
  25. Neelands, J. (2004). Miracles are happening: Beyond the rhetoric of transformation in the Western traditions of drama education. Research in Drama Education, 9(1), 47-56.10.1080/1356978042000185902
  26. Oreck, B. A., Owen, S. V., & Baum, S. M. (2003). Validity, reliability, and equity issues in an observational talent assessment process in the performing arts. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(1), 62-94.10.1177/016235320302700105
  27. Phelan, P. (2004). Marina Abramović: witnessing shadows. Theatre Journal, 56, 569-577.10.1353/tj.2004.0178
  28. Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83-96.10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
  29. Podlozny, A. (2000). Strengthening verbal skills through the use of classroom drama: A clear link. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 239-275.10.2307/3333644
  30. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180.
  31. Sawyer, R. K. (2000). Improvisation and the creative process: Dewey, Collingwood, and the aesthetics of spontaneity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 58(2), 149-161.10.1111/1540-6245.jaac58.2.0149
  32. Sawyer, R. K., (2003). Group creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group: New York and London.
  33. Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350.10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350
  34. Scruggs, M., & Gellman, M. J. (2007). Process: An improviser’s journey. Northwestern University Press.
  35. Spicker, H. H. (1992). Identifying and enriching rural gifted children. Educational Horizons, 70(2), 60-65.
  36. Spolin, V. (1999). Improvisation for the theater: A handbook of teaching and directing techniques. Northwestern University Press.
  37. Torrance, E. (1972). Predictive validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking*. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(4), 236-262.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x
  38. Walker, E., Tabone, C., & Weltsek, G. (2011). When achievement data meet drama and arts integration. Language Arts, 88(5), 365.10.58680/la201114932
  39. Weltsek, G. (2005). Using Process Drama to Deconstruct “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”. English Journal, 95, 75-81.10.2307/30047402
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 19
Submitted on: Aug 22, 2018
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2019
Published on: Jun 28, 2019
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Anthony Phonethibsavads, Sophia Bender, Kylie Peppler, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.