A simplified maturity index to quantify the development stage of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and its relationship with yield and nutritive value

Salama, Heba; Loesche, Marc; Herrmann, Antje; Taube, Friedhelm; Gierus, Martin

doi:10.1515/boku-2017-0009

Abstract

Plant maturity substantially influences the yield and quality performance of grasses. Grass phenology is often not considered objectively to evaluate the new genotypes prior to registration. Measuring the mean stage by count (MSC) is time consuming, and simplified approaches are, therefore, required. Twenty diploid, intermediate heading Lolium perenne L. genotypes were evaluated in a 2-year field study in Northern Germany for yield and the content of Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF), Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF), Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL), and digestible organic matter (DOM). Data from the first and second cut, each comprising three sampling dates, were included in this study. A simplified maturity index (SMI8), expressing the percentage of tillers at or beyond the boot stage, from MSC was derived. This index resulted in similar correlations with yield and quality parameters compared to MSC but is easier to use and less laborious. The SMI8 reduced the variations among genotypes, as for the first cut NDF and ADF content, where the genotype effect disappeared after considering SMI8 as the covariable. Moreover, the ranking of the genotypes was slightly modified for most studied traits, indicating that a large part of the variations in the studied parameters was caused by variations in maturity.

References

Ansquer, P., Al Haj Khaled, R., Cruz, P., Theau, J.-P., Therond, O. and M. Duru (2009): Characterizing and predicting plant phenology in species-rich grasslands. Grass and Forage Science 64, 57–70.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brueland B.A., Harmoney, K.R., Moore, K.J., George, J.R. and E.C. Brummer (2003): Developmental morphology of smooth bromegrass growth following spring grazing. Crop Science 43, 1789–1796.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cop, J., Lavrencic, A. and K. Košmelj (2009): Morphological development and nutritive value of herbage in five temperate grass species during primary growth: analysis of time dynamics. Grass and Forage Science 64, 122–131.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
De Boever J.L., Cottyn, B.L., Andries, J.I., Buysse, F.X. and J.M. Vanacker (1988): The use of cellulase technique to predict digestibility, metabolizable and net energy of forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19, 247–260.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Haun, J.R. (1973): Visual quantification of wheat development. Agronomy Journal 65, 116–119.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holm, S. (1979): A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 65–70.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jeangross B., Scehovic, J., Schubiger, F.X., Lehmann, J., Daccord, R. and Y. Arrigo (2001): Nährwert von Wiesenpflanzen: Trockensubstanz-, Rohprotein- und Zuckergehalte. Agrarforschung 8, 79–86.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kalu, B.A. and G.W. Fick (1981): Quantifying morphological development of alfalfa for studies of herbage quality. Crop Science 21, 267–271.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mika, V. (1983): A comparison of the nutritive values of early and late varieties of timothy. Grass and Forage Science 38, 67–71.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moore, K.J. and L.E. Moser (1995): Quantifying developmental morphology of perennial grasses. Crop Science 35, 37–43.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moore, K.J., Moser, L.E., Vogel, K.P., Waller, S.S., Johnson, B.E. and J.F. Pedersen (1991): Describing and quantifying growth stages of perennial forage grasses. Agronomy Journal 83, 1073–1077.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Park, B.-H. (1980): Untersuchungen zum Entwicklungsverlauf im Primäraufwuchs von perennierenden Futtergräsern. Dissertation, Universität Gießen.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pontes, L.S., Carrère, P., Andueza, D., Louault, F. and J.F. Soussana (2007): Seasonal production nutritive value of temperate grasses found in semi-natural pastures in Europe: responses to cutting frequency and N supply. Grass and Forage Science 62, 485–496.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sanderson, M.A. (1992): Morphological development of switch grass and kleingrass. Agronomy Journal 84, 415–419.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sanderson, M.A. and W.F. Wedin (1989): Phenological stage and herbage quality relationships in temperate grasses and legumes. Agronomy Journal 81, 864–869.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SAS Institute, Inc. (2000): SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 9.1 SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simon, U. and B.H. Park (1983): A descriptive scheme for stages of development in perennial forage grasses. In: Smith, J.A. and V.W. Hays (Eds.): Proceedings of the 14^th International Grassland Congress, Lexington, KY, 15-24 June 1981. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 416–418.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sweet, N., Wiltshire, J.J.J. and C.K. Baker (1991): A new descriptive scale for early reproductive development in Lolium perenne L. Grass and Forage Science 46, 201– 206.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Valente, M.E., Borreani G., Peiretti, P.G. and E. Tabacco (2000): Codified morphological stage for predicting digestibility of Italian ryegrass during the spring cycle. Agronomy Journal 92, 967–973.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Santen, E. and M.D. Casler (1990a): Methods for visually rating maturity in tetraploid Dactylis L. Plant Breeding 105, 26–32.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Santen, E. and M.D. Casler (1990b): Forage quality traits and dry matter yield in 4x progeny from interploidy crosses in Dactylis L. Crop Science 30, 35–39.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Soest, P.J. (1994): Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2^nd ed., Cornell University Press, New York.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and B.A. Lewis (1991): Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weissbach F., Kuhla, S. Schmidt, L. and A. Henkels (1999): Estimation of the digestibility and the metabolizable energy of grass and grass products. Proceedings of the Society of Nutrition Physiology 8, 72.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
West, C.P. (1990): A proposed growth stage system for bermudagrass. In: Forages – sustaining food production and environmental quality. Proceedings of the American Forage and Grassland Conference, Blacksburg, VA, 6-9 June 1990. American Forage and Grassland Council, Georgetown, TX, pp. 38–42.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
West, C.P., Walker, D.W., Bacon, R.K., Longer, D.E. and K.E. Turner (1991): Phenological analysis of forage yield and quality in winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 83, 217–224.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T. and C.F. Konzak (1974): A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 515–421.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

A simplified maturity index to quantify the development stage of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and its relationship with yield and nutritive value

Abstract

Paradigm

My account