Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effect of nitrogen fertilization and genotype on the yield and yield components of winter wheat Cover

Effect of nitrogen fertilization and genotype on the yield and yield components of winter wheat

Open Access
|Apr 2016

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Effect of N treatment on the soil properties in the 0- to 20-cm layer at the end of the experiment

Tabelle 1. Einfluss der N-Düngung auf die Bodeneigenschaften in der Tiefe von 0–20 cm am Ende des Versuches

N fertilizationHumus contentpH valueTotal NAL-P2O5AL-K2O
kg · ha–1[%](KCl)[mg · kg–1][mg · kg–1][mg · kg–1]
02.74a6.86ab7.88b282.0a205.0a
802.94a6.55b9.94ab236.3a221.5a
1602.81a7.02a11.18ab247.8a206.3a
2402.96a6.76ab13.32a259.5a233.3a

† Each plot was given 120 kg · ha–1 of each P2O5 and K2O fertilizer.

† Each plot was given 120 kg · ha–1 of each P2O5 and K2O fertilizer.

Figure 1

Monthly precipitation and mean air temperature at the experimental site (2007–2009)

Abbildung 1. Monatliche Niederschlagsmengen und Durchschnittstemperaturen am Versuchsstandort (2007–2009)

Figure 2

Effect of N fertilization and genotype on the grain yield of wheat for each N treatment and cultivar in the three years (vertical lines in the columns represent LSD5%)

Abbildung 2. Einfluss der N-Düngung und des Genotyps auf den Kornertrag von Weizen für jede N-Stufe und Sorte in den drei Versuchsjahren (vertikale Linien in den Spalten repräsentieren LSD5%)

Table 2

Analysis of variance for the two-factor, split-plot experiment

Tabelle 2. Varianzanalyse für den zwei-faktoriellen Versuch mit Split-Plot-Design

Factord.f.200720082009
MSF-valueMSF-valueMSF-value
Replication34.12697.900.43311.081.21851.74
Fertilization37.983615.28***21.401353.59***7.284810.39**
Residual (a)90.52254.280.39931.820.70093.87
Variety20.69415.68**1.55437.06**2.856015.78***
Fertilization × Variety60.12521.03NS0.16910.77NS0.26661.47NS
Residual (b)240.12210.22000.1810
Total470.9811.6700.925

Significance levels

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

** P<0.01

** P<0.01

** P<0.01

*** P<0.001

NS = nonsignificant

NS = nonsignificant

NS = nonsignificant

Table 3

Effect of N fertilization on the yield components of wheat cultivars (2007–2009)

Tabelle 3. Einfluss der N-Düngung auf die Ertragskomponenten der Weizensorten (2007–2009)

N dose200720082009
ToborzóPalotásVerbunkosToborzóPalotásVerbunkosToborzóPalotásVerbunkos
Spike number per square meter
N0655.8620.8639.0493.8512.8487.5469.0415.2425.5
N80685.0674.5644.0583.2614.2527.0521.0535.2543.8
N160745.0703.8693.2689.0570.8715.8610.2697.2560.0
N240823.8699.2726.5753.2612.2593.2643.2624.8680.8
LSD values
N77.59*62.12***38.16***
V46.13*31.62**40.10NS
N×V102.66NS76.67***73.14*
Grain number per spike
N010.7212.3513.0514.6520.6222.3014.2321.2321.20
N808.7214.7515.0228.1239.3246.1028.5336.9237.30
N1608.4514.3514.8034.7246.3548.9232.9238.6246.20
N2408.2014.4516.4732.3241.7050.6238.4237.7247.02
LSD values
N1.525NS2.865***2.870***
V1.180***2.539***2.143***
N×V2.345*4.832NS4.314*
Thousand kernel weight (g)
N056.2044.8746.0753.1042.2740.0554.6745.0541.45
N8054.8244.3243.5754.6042.8042.1053.0545.3240.70
N16053.1247.2545.8250.0538.8239.4049.5741.2238.30
N24052.2043.9240.9750.2237.3737.3048.8239.6038.30
LSD values
N1.704**1.235***2.886**
V1.559***0.980***1.981***
N×V2.941NS1.930NS4.124NS

Significance levels

* P<0.05

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

* P<0.05

** P<0.01

NS = nonsignificant; V = variety

NS = nonsignificant; V = variety

*** P<0.001

* P<0.05

NS = nonsignificant; V = variety

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

* P<0.05

NS = nonsignificant; V = variety

* P<0.05

** P<0.01

*** P<0.001

** P<0.01

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

NS = nonsignificant; V = variety

NS = nonsignificant; V = variety

NS = nonsignificant; V = variety

Table 4

Effect of N treatments on the harvest index (HI %) of the wheat cultivars (2007–2009)

Tabelle 4. Einfluss der N-Düngung auf den Harvestindex (HI %) der Weizensorten (2007–2009)

N dose200720082009
ToborzóPalotásVerbunkosToborzóPalotásVerbunkosToborzóPalotásVerbunkos
N038.5038.7536.7538.5041.2540.0040.7543.2544.00
N8039.2543.5042.0040.0043.0042.0041.5044.7542.75
N16044.2546.0043.0040.7542.7542.7541.5047.0045.75
N24042.0041.5044.0040.2541.5041.5040.2546.5049.25
LSD values
N2.112***1.160*1.560**
V1.727NS1.627*1.392***
N×V3.369NS2.829NS2.644*

Significance levels

*** P<0.001

* P<0.05

** P<0.01

NS = nonsignificant; V = variety

* P<0.05

*** P<0.001

NS = nonsignificant; V = variety

NS = nonsignificant; V = variety

* P<0.05

Table 5

Effect of N fertilization on the chlorophyll content (SPAD index) of the flag leaf in the individual wheat cultivars (2007–2009)

Tabelle 5. Einfluss der N-Düngung auf den Chlorophyllgehalt (SPAD Index) des Fahnenblattes der Weizensorten (2007–2009)

N dose200720082009
ToborzóPalotásVerbunkosToborzóPalotásVerbunkosToborzóPalotásVerbunkos
N043.4545.0845.2845.8045.8546.8546.6742.8243.77
N8051.7854.6356.1048.9049.4550.5251.0749.9553.10
N16053.5857.1057.6052.0854.2555.1253.5752.8254.90
N24054.0058.2558.2352.9054.5355.3554.2353.8056.62
LSD values
N2.896***0.443***1.290***
V1.260***0.606***0.874***
N×V3.381NS1.056NS1.830**

Significance levels

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

*** P<0.001

NS = nonsignificant; V = variety

NS = nonsignificant; V = variety

** P<0.01

Figure 3

Correlation between yield (t · ha–1) and grain number per square meter (GrNo), yield and thousand kernel weight (TKW), yield and harvest index (HI), and yield and chlorophyll content of the flag leaf (SPAD)

Abbildung 3. Korrelation zwischen dem Ertrag (t ·ha–1) und der Kornzahl pro m2 (GrNo), dem Ertrag und dem Tausendkorngewicht (TKW), dem Ertrag und dem Ernteindex (HI) und dem Ertrag und dem Chlorophyllgehalt des Fahnenblattes (SPAD)

Table 6

Results of regression analysis for two independent variables (grain number per square meter, thousand kernel weight) on the yield of winter wheat for each N treatment

Tabelle 6. Ergebnisse der Regressionanalyse von zwei unabhängigen Variablen (Kornzahl pro m2, Tausendkorngewicht) auf dem Ertrag von Winterweizen für jede N-Stufe

ParameterN0N80N160N240
Estimatet-valueEstimatet-valueEstimatet-valueEstimatet-value
Constant6.051.07NS5.212.49*6.676.69***5.814.00**
Grain number5.702 × 10−50.22NS9.86 × 10−53.04*5.45 × 10-55.20**8.26 × 10−54.62**
TKW−0.023−0.29NS0.0060.17NS−0.011−0.60NS−0.06 10–2−0.02NS
R2% = 15.8R20/0% = 54.9R20/0% = 88.6R20/0% = 76.9
F-value <1F-value = 5.87*F-value = 32.08***F-value = 14.32**

Significance levels

NS = nonsignificant; TKW = thousand kernel weight.

* P<0.05

*** P<0.001

** P<0.01

NS = nonsignificant; TKW = thousand kernel weight.

* P<0.05

** P<0.01

** P<0.01

NS = nonsignificant; TKW = thousand kernel weight.

NS = nonsignificant; TKW = thousand kernel weight.

NS = nonsignificant; TKW = thousand kernel weight.

NS = nonsignificant; TKW = thousand kernel weight.

* P<0.05

*** P<0.001

** P<0.01

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/boku-2016-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5430 (formerly 0006-5471) | Journal ISSN: 0006-5471
Language: English, German
Page range: 25 - 34
Submitted on: Mar 3, 2015
Accepted on: Jan 29, 2016
Published on: Apr 20, 2016
Published by: Universität für Bodenkultur Wien
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2016 Eszter Sugár, Zoltán Berzsenyi, Tamás Árendás, Péter Bónis, published by Universität für Bodenkultur Wien
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.