Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Management of Myocardial Infarction: Emerging Paradigms for the Future Cover

Management of Myocardial Infarction: Emerging Paradigms for the Future

Open Access
|Aug 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Clinical trials assessing changes in infarct size with various clinical interventions.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 STEMI: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; SPECT: single-photon emission computed tomography; CMR: cardiac magnetic resonance; IABP: intra-aortic balloon pump

TRIALPATIENTS ENROLLED (N)TEST FOR INFARCT SIZEKEY INTERVENTIONPRIMARY END POINTKEY FINDING
EMERALD8501SPECTPCI with balloon occlusion and aspiration distal microcirculatory protection system vs angioplasty without distal protectionST segment resolution after PCI and infarct size measured by SPECT 5–14 days post-interventionDistal embolic flow did not improve the rate of reperfusion success, reduce infarct size, or enhance event-free survival
AMIHOT-II9301SPECT90-minute intracoronary supersaturated oxygen infusion versus standard of careAssessment of infarct size and major adverse events at 30 days post-interventionFor patients with anterior STEMI, infusion of super-saturated oxygen results in a significant reduction in infarct size
IMMEDIATE10 #54SPECTIntravenous administration of glucose, infusion, and potassium in acute coronary syndrome patients versus placeboSubstudy: Assessment of heart failure at 30 days, infarct size, left ventricular function, and beta-natriuretic peptide levelsSubstudy: Among patients presenting with ST-segment elevation, infarct size was lower than placebo.
APEX-AMI10, 11 #99CMRAdministration of pexelizumab versus placebo in patients undergoing primary PCI of first myocardial infarctionSubstudy:
Assessment of infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction
Substudy:
Pexelizumab-treated patients had smaller infarct sizes and high left ventricular ejection fraction
LIPSIA-ABCIXIMAB12154CMRAdministration of intracoronary vs intravenous abciximab in patients undergoing primary PCIThe primary end point was infarct size and extent of microvascular obstruction on CMRIntracoronary administration is superior to intravenous administration of abciximab with respect to infarct size and extent of microvascular obstruction
LIPSIA-N-ACC13251CMRAdministration of N-acetylcysteine versus placebo in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCIChanges in serum creatinine level and reduction in reperfusion injury measured as myocardial salvage indexN-acetylcysteine reduces oxidative stress but does provide additional benefit in contrast induced nephropathy and myocardial reperfusion injury
LIPISA- STEMI14162CMRPre-hospital tenecteplase with primary PCI versus primary PCI with antithrombotic comedication in patients with STEMI with long transfer distanceInfarct size assessed by CMRFibrinolytic based assisted PCI does not offer improved benefit with respect to infarct size when compared to primary PCI
CRISP-AMI15337CMRInsertion of IABP in anterior STEMI prior to primary PCI with continuation for 12 hours versus primary PCI aloneInfarct size measured by CMR 3–5 days post PCIIABP with primary PCI in STEMI without shock did not improve infarct size vs primary PCI
AIDA STEMI16795CMRIntravenous versus intracoronary Abciximab administration in STEMIInfarct size as determined by CMRNo benefit in intravenous versus intracoronary administration of abciximab with respect to myocardial damage and/or reperfusion injury
INFUSE AMI17452CMRintracoronary abciximab versus manual aspiration thrombectomy or both in patients with STEMIInfarct size at 30 days as determined by CMRIn patients undergoing PCI with bivalirudin, intracoronary abciximab reduced infarct size at 30 days but not with aspiration thrombectomy

[i] # Substudy of clinical trial

Figure 1

Cardioprotective effects of left ventricular unloading. Image adapted from Curran et al.30 AMI: acute myocardial infarction; VAD: ventricular assist device; RISK: reperfusion injury salvage kinase; CO: cardiac output; MAP: mean arterial pressure; LVEDP: left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVEDV: left ventricular end-diastolic volume; MVO2: myocardial oxygen consumption; LA: left atrial; AAR: myocardial area at risk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcvj.1393 | Journal eISSN: 1947-6108
Language: English
Page range: 54 - 63
Submitted on: Apr 10, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 25, 2024
Published on: Aug 20, 2024
Published by: Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Vandan D. Upadhyaya, Christopher Wong, Ramzan M. Zakir, Nima Aghili, Haroon Faraz, Navin K. Kapur, published by Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.