Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Management of Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Chronic Lung Disease Cover

Management of Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Chronic Lung Disease

Open Access
|Jul 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Differentiation between group 1 pulmonary hypertension (PH) and group 3 PH.1 Figure courtesy of authors. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC: forced vital capacity; ILD: interstitial lung disease; PAH: pulmonary arterial hypertension; DLCO: carbon monoxide diffusing capacity test; CPET: cardiopulmonary exercise test

1 Moderate-to-severe PH defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥ 35 mm Hg, or ≥ 25 mm Hg with a cardiac index < 2.0 L/min/m2

2 Other risk factors include connective tissue disease, portal hypertension, human immunodeficiency virus infection, exposure to definite or probable medications that cause group 1 PH, genetic mutations, congenital heart disease

3 Features of circulatory limitation include preserved breathing reserve, low oxygen pulse, low cardiac output/VO2 slope, no change or decrease in PaCO2 during exercise. Features of ventilatory limitation include low breathing reserve, normal oxygen pulse, normal cardiac output/VO2 slope, increase in PaCO2 during exercise, dynamic hyperinflation.

Table 1

Randomized trials of therapies proposed in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-associated pulmonary hypertension (PH). Table courtesy of authors. PDE5: phosphodiesterase type-5; TID: three times a day; sPAP: systolic pulmonary artery pressure; 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; VO2: oxygen uptake; QoL: quality of life; mPAP: mean pulmonary artery pressure; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; WU: Wood units; BODE: body mass index, obstruction, dyspnea, exercise capacity index; CI: cardiac index; SF-36: Short Form 36; BID: twice daily

AUTHORREFNDRUGSEVERITY OF PHFOLLOW-UP PERIODEND POINT(S)
PDE5 INHIBITORS
Rao et al., 20111733Sildenafil 20 mg TID vs placebosPAP > 40 mm Hg on echo12 weeks6MWD: +190 m vs placebo
sPAP: decreased
Lederer et al., 20121810Sildenafil 25 mg TID vs placeboNo PH4 weeks6MWD: no effect
VO2: no effect
QoL: worsened
Blanco et al., 20131960Sildenafil 20 mg TID vs placebo in patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitationmPAP 31 ± 5 mm Hg12 weeksCycle endurance time: no effect
6MWD: no effect
VO2: no effect
Goudie et al., 201420120Tadalafil 120 mg daily vs placebosPAP 42 ± 10 mm Hg
(as estimated on echocardiogram)
12 weekssPAP: decreased –12.3 mm Hg
6MWD: no effect
QoL: no effect
BNP: no effect
Vitulo et al., 20172128Sildenafil 20 mg TID vs placebomPAP 25 mm Hg in 68%
mPAP 39 ± 8 mm Hg
PVR 7 ± 2.6 WU
16 weeksPVR: –1.38 WU
CI: +0.42 L/min/m2
BODE: improved
6MWD: no effect
SF-36: +9.85 units
ENDOTHELIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS
Stoltz et al., 20082330Bosentan 62.5 mg BID for 2 weeks followed by 125 mg BID vs placebomPAP at rest ≥ 30 mm Hg12 weeks6MWD: -10 m vs placebo
Valerio et al., 20092432Bosentan 125 mg BID vs placebomPAP 37 ± 5 mm Hg18 months6MWD: +65 m
mPAP: – 6 mm Hg
PVR: –50 dynes·sec·cm–5
BODE index: improved
Table 2

Randomized trials of therapies proposed in the management of interstitial lung disease–associated pulmonary hypertension (PH). Table courtesy of authors. IPF: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; BID: twice daily; RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; QoL: quality of life; FVC: forced vital capacity; TID: three times daily; ILD: interstitial lung disease; IIP: idiopathic interstitial pneumonia; IBW: ideal body weight

AUTHORREFNLUNG DISEASEDRUGPH PATIENTS INCLUDED?FOLLOW-UP PERIODEND POINTS
ENDOTHELIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS
King et al., 200835158IPFBosentan 62.5 mg BID for 4 weeks followed by 125 mg BID vs placeboYes: mild PH on echo (RVSP < 50 mm Hg) included12 months6MWD: no difference
Disease progression: favors bosentan
Lung function: no difference
Dyspnea and QoL: favors bosentan
King et al., 201136616IPFBosentan 62.5 mg BID for 4 weeks followed by 125 mg BID vs placeboYes20 monthsTime to IPF worsening or death: no difference
QoL: no difference
Dyspnea: no difference
Change in FVC: no difference
Raghu et al., 201337494IPFAmbrisentan 10 mg daily vs placeboYes, but excluded patients on other long-term PH therapies34 weeksTime to IPF progression: terminated early due to higher disease progression in ambrisentan group
Hospitalizations: increased in ambrisentan group
6MWD: no difference
Lung function decline: no difference
Raghu et al., 201338494IPFMacitentan 10 mg vs placeboYes12 monthsChange in FVC: no difference
Time to IPF worsening or death: no difference
Dyspnea: no difference
Adverse events: no difference
SOLUBLE GUANYLATE CYCLASE STIMULATORS
Nathan et al., 201939147IIPRiociguat, up to 2.5 mg TID vs placeboYes26 weeks6MWD: no difference
Time to clinical worsening: no difference
PDE5 INHIBITORS
Zisman et al., 201040180IPFSildenafil 20 mg TID vs placeboYes12 weeks6MWD improvement of > 20%: no significant difference
Han et al., 201341119IPFSildenafil 20 mg TID vs placeboYes12 weeks6MWD improvement of > 20%: no significant difference
QoL improvement: no significant difference
Behr et al., 202042177IPFSildenafil 20 mg TID with pirfenidone vs. placebo with pirfenidoneYes52 weeksProgression-free survival: no significant difference
6MWD decline < 15%: no significant difference
INHALED MEDICATIONS
Nathan et al., 20204341Fibrosing ILDInhaled NO 30–45 μg/kg IBW/h vs. placeboSubjects stratified as low-, intermediate- and high-probability of PH. Subjects included if PH proven on RHC.8 weeksModerate/ vigorous physical activity: statistically significant improvement
Waxman et al., 202047326Any ILDTreprostinil 60–72 μg inhaled vs. placeboYes16 weeksMean change from baseline in peak 6MWD through week 16: +31.12 m (95% CI, 16.85–45.39)
NT-proBNP: improved
Time to clinical worsening: 39% reduction
Table 3

Approach to management of lung disease–associated pulmonary hypertension (PH). Table courtesy of authors. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ILD: interstitial lung disease; WHO: World Health Organization

SUGGESTED INTERVENTIONS FOR PATIENTS WITH GROUP 3 AND GROUP 5 PH1
All patientsOptimization of the underlying pulmonary condition, including smoking cessation and relevant disease-specific therapies
Supplemental O2 therapy in patients with resting hypoxemia
Referral for lung transplantation, if eligible
INTERVENTIONS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED FOR PATIENTS WITH GROUP 3 AND GROUP 5 PH1
All patientsReferral to a PH expert center for consideration of invasive diagnostic testing and individualized therapy or enrollment in clinical trials
INTERVENTIONS THAT SHOULD NOT BE ROUTINELY CONSIDERED FOR PATIENTS WITH WHO GROUP 3 AND GROUP 5 PH1
All patientsPhosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE5) inhibitors, endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs); calcium channel blockers; inhaled nitric oxide; inhaled and intravenous prostacyclins; guanylate cyclase stimulators
INTERVENTIONS THAT ARE CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION OR CONSIDERATION ON AN INDIVIDUALIZED OR EXPERIMENTAL BASIS FOR PATIENTS WITH GROUP 3 AND GROUP 5 PH
COPD-associated PHPDE5-inhibitors (sildenafil)21,22; inhaled treprostinil (NCT03496623); inhaled soluble guanate cyclase modulator (NCT04370873)
ILD-associated PHInhaled pulmonary vasodilators, including inhaled treprostinil47
Sarcoidosis-associated PHBosentan52,53,55,56; pulmonary artery angioplasty, with or without stenting of focal stenoses58,59
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14797/ZKUT3813 | Journal eISSN: 1947-6108
Language: English
Page range: 124 - 133
Accepted on: Dec 12, 2021
Published on: Jul 1, 2021
Published by: Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Jordan Sugarman, Jason Weatherald, published by Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.