Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Urban and Geographic Aspects of Building Height in Former Provincial Capitals in Poland Cover

Urban and Geographic Aspects of Building Height in Former Provincial Capitals in Poland

Open Access
|Jun 2026

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Provincial capital cities in 1975–1998.

Table 1.

Cities covered by the study: number of buildings, location of centres, DSM/DTM resources used.

CityNumber of buildingsCentres coordinates [PUWG1922]DSMDTM
XYDateGridDateGrid
Biała Podlaska15,099782432.0471095.02023-09-271.02023-09-270.5
Bielsko-Biała34,949503072.0217090.02024-04-301.02024-04-300.5
Chełm11,902812873.0372397.02023-09-281.02023-09-280.5
Ciechanów9954608917.0558612.02024-08-151.02023-09-100.5
Częstochowa48,958507974.0327241.02024-04-291.02024-04-290.5
Elbląg12,779525705.0699419.02023-09-061.02023-09-060.5
Jelenia Góra13,914270472.0342438.02024-07-061.02024-07-060.5
Kalisz19,985437179.0433287.02024-09-041.02024-09-040.5
Konin13,491449103.0483132.02024-09-011.02024-09-010.5
Koszalin14,876316198.0706579.02024-09-231.02024-09-230.5
Krosno11,593699356.0206596.02024-05-271.02023-05-010.5
Legnica12,305301731.0375047.02024-03-261.02024-03-260.5
Leszno13,804332962.0444684.02024-09-041.02024-09-040.5
Łomża9073705858.0594847.02024-06-271.02023-10-030.5
Nowy Sącz19,009622104.0196668.02024-06-211.02023-05-010.5
Ostrołęka9834671859.0582960.02024-07-201.02023-10-030.5
Piła10,567348636.0589686.02024-09-171.02024-09-170.5
Piotrków Trybunalski16,758548400.0393745.02024-04-091.02024-04-090.5
Płock18,033546460.0520109.02023-09-121.02023-09-120.5
Przemyśl9518771263.0219576.02024-06-161.02023-09-050.5
Radom41,120648989.0395108.02023-09-091.02023-09-090.5
Siedlce14,560724350.0483060.02023-09-081.02023-09-080.5
Sieradz10,664481865.0414249.02024-04-271.02024-04-270.5
Skierniewice12,131578483.0455118.02024-03-311.02024-03-310.5
Słupsk10,096372448.0735424.02024-10-121.02024-10-120.5
Suwałki10,633756659.0700035.02024-05-281.02023-09-160.5
Tarnobrzeg10,427689165.0304200.02024-06-301.02023-05-010.5
Tarnów19,605642418.0240254.02024-06-151.02023-09-060.5
Wałbrzych13,297308432.0325626.02024-04-081.02024-04-080.5
Włocławek16,478504877.0532766.02024-09-071.02024-09-070.5
Zamość11,158800071.0325303.02023-09-041.02023-09-040.5

1 DSM – digital surface model; DTM – digital terrain model.

Table 2.

Average building heights in former provincial cities in Poland.

CityAverage building height within radius Z from traditional city centre
1 km2 km3 km5 kmTotal
Legnica14.2011.5910.8710.4410.40
Bielsko-Biała13.0710.9710.409.319.09
Częstochowa12.0710.399.508.848.83
Elbląg11.7311.0710.6010.229.99
Wałbrzych11.7210.6810.219.669.88
Kalisz11.699.409.008.528.31
Przemyśl11.5810.159.489.069.05
Słupsk11.269.369.189.069.06
Tarnów11.2610.049.378.958.93
Koszalin11.119.609.278.838.71
Płock10.9410.269.459.579.16
Jelenia Góra10.8610.1210.019.629.28
Piła10.799.438.738.498.45
Włocławek10.509.449.168.908.73
Tarnobrzeg10.489.368.537.867.68
Siedlce10.258.898.868.798.79
Radom9.999.909.508.808.45
Ciechanów9.918.748.498.328.31
Leszno9.878.417.927.887.88
Suwałki9.738.388.838.758.84
Łomża9.709.709.288.928.92
Ostrołęka9.619.019.169.139.10
Chełm9.438.288.007.998.16
Piotrków Trybunalski9.368.638.578.388.37
Zamość9.308.578.298.188.18
Nowy Sącz9.299.028.648.348.10
Krosno8.878.578.267.907.87
Skierniewice8.417.807.747.637.71
Sieradz8.138.158.057.737.70
Biała Podlaska7.858.227.817.627.62
Konin7.417.828.247.828.70
Fig. 2.

Visualisations of Zamość developed using the compiled data.

Fig. 3.

Jelenia Góra – subsequent stages of model development.

Fig. 4.

Average building heights in former provincial cities in Poland in relation to distance from the city centre.

Fig. 5.

Clustering by average building height profile of former provincial cities based on the k-means method.

Table 3.

Classification of cities into clusters.

Cluster 1Cluster 2
Biała PodlaskaBielsko-Biała
ChełmCzęstochowa
CiechanówElbląg
KoninJelenia Góra
KrosnoKalisz
LesznoKoszalin
ŁomżaLegnica
Nowy SączPiła
OstrołękaPłock
Piotrków TrybunalskiPrzemyśl
SiedlceRadom
SieradzSłupsk
SkierniewiceTarnów
SuwałkiWałbrzych
TarnobrzegWłocławek
Zamość
Fig. 6.

Spatial distribution of former provincial cities based on cluster analysis.

Table 4.

Selected measures and indicators used to assess former provincial cities based on Statistics Poland Local Data Bank.

Cities202420242023/202420242023
12345
Indicator/measure
Biała Podlaska53.891090.998.972363.875676
Bielsko-Biała164.321320.499.133472.706783
Chełm56.431411.998.642159.485412
Ciechanów41.471265.299.352605.484913
Częstochowa203.631274.898.862755.996165
Elbląg112.051403.899.232260.656282
Jelenia Góra74.19678.898.762482.035515
Kalisz91.961325.598.733031.365795
Konin66.10803.298.553105.665222
Koszalin105.26997.199.732728.056723
Krosno43.59975.098.932704.865849
Legnica90.821613.598.772790.335352
Leszno59.521868.299.122911.355639
Łomża59.261814.099.252353.316227
Nowy-Sącz79.821385.899.333085.636233
Ostrołęka47.701425.598.903257.255868
Saw69.38765.799.042789.205523
Piotrków Trybunalski66.02981.999.252759.795639
Płock110.021249.698.955845.956276
Przemyśl55.291197.698.642088.545030
Radom193.781733.298.862482.736271
Siedlce74.782347.1103.432925.977703
Sieradz38.30747.798.892709.075474
Skierniewice45.121304.199.872873.806636
Słupsk84.771607.399.152357.745693
Suwałki68.141040.299.872466.386500
Tarnobrzeg43.22506.198.881988.255418
Tarnów102.121411.199.022781.235877
Walbrzych98.751166.198.462055.254161
Włocławek99.471169.098.672994.535403
Zamość57.521896.398.782185.776555

1 Note: 1 – Population in thousands, 2 – Population per 1 km2, 3 – Decline/growth in population (in %), 4 – Wealth per capita (G-index of basic tax revenue per capita of the municipality adopted for the calculation of the compensatory subsidy for 2024), 5 – Average price per 1 m2 of dwellings sold under market transactions.

Table 5.

Relationship between building height of former provincial capitals in Poland and selected socio-economic indicators in 2024 – based on the Spearman rank order correlation.

Indicator/measureAverage city height within administrative borders [W1]Average city height within 1 km radius from conventional central point [W2]
Population in thousands [Z1]0.5970.706
Population per 1 km2 [Z2]0.2050.158
Population decrease/growth in % [Z3]–0.053–0.085
Wealth per capita [Z4]0.0740.005
Average price per m2 of dwellings [Z5]0.0470.024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2026-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103 (formerly 0137-477X)
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 45
Submitted on: Jun 30, 2025
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2026 Paweł Czapliński, Paweł Rubinowicz, Olga Gazińska, Konrad Bajor, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.