Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What Doesn’t Work in the European Cohesion Policy? Development Challenges of the Inner Periphery After the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Cover

What Doesn’t Work in the European Cohesion Policy? Development Challenges of the Inner Periphery After the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic

Quaestiones Geographicae
Volume 43 (2024): Issue 4 (December 2024)
By: Paweł Churski,  Czesław Adamiak,  Anna Dubownik,  Maciej Pietrzykowski and  Barbara Szyda  
Open Access
|Dec 2024

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Research procedure. FUAs – functional urban areas; FGIs – focus group interviews; IDIs – individual in-depth interviews
Research procedure. FUAs – functional urban areas; FGIs – focus group interviews; IDIs – individual in-depth interviews

Fig. 2.

Inner peripheries in the FUA typology in Poland. FUA – functional urban areas
Inner peripheries in the FUA typology in Poland. FUA – functional urban areas

Fig. 3.

Algorithm and scope of procedure in qualitative research. FGI – focus group interview; IDI – individual in-depth interview; FUA – functional urban area
Algorithm and scope of procedure in qualitative research. FGI – focus group interview; IDI – individual in-depth interview; FUA – functional urban area
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2024-0038 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 75 - 93
Submitted on: Oct 26, 2024
Published on: Dec 31, 2024
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
cohesion policy,
inner peripheries,
functional urban areas,
SARS-CoV-2,
European Union,
Poland
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geography

© 2024 Paweł Churski, Czesław Adamiak, Anna Dubownik, Maciej Pietrzykowski, Barbara Szyda, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 43 (2024): Issue 4 (December 2024)Next article