References
- Alibašić H., Casula M., 2023. Navigating collaborative governance in Florida: An analysis of local governments resilience amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Affairs 24(1). DOI 10.1002/pa.2890.
- Angelopoulos S., Silva A., Navon Y., Sinclair S., Yanotti M., 2023. Economic resilience in a pandemic: Did COVID-19 policy effects override industry diversity impacts in Australia? Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy 42(2): 153–171. DOI 10.1111/1759-3441.12384.
- Artelaris P., Mavrommatis G., 2022. Territorial cohesion, the COVID-19 crisis and the urban paradox: Future challenges in urbanization and economic agglomeration. Region: the journal of ERSA 9(1): 135–146. DOI 10.18335/region.v9i1.403.
- Auzina-Emsina A., Ozolina V., 2022. Two-speed or three-speed recovery in post-COVID era: Regional and sectoral development. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University. https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2022.861.
- Ballantyne P., Singleton A., Dolega L., Macdonald J., 2023. Integrating the who, what, and where of US retail center geographies. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 113(2): 488–510. DOI 10.1080/24694452.2022.2098087.
- Barca F., 2009. An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. A placebased approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Online: migrant-integration.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2010-12/docl_17396_240404999.pdf (accessed 12 June 2024).
- Barca F., McCann P., Rodríguez-Pose A., 2012. The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science 52(1): 134–152. DOI10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x.
- Bartik T.J., 2020. Using place-based jobs policies to help distressed communities. Journal of Economic Perspectives 34(3): 99–127. DOI 10.1257/jep.34.3.99.
- Bartik A.W., Bertrand M., Cullen Z., Glaeser E.L., Muca M., 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations. PNAS 117(30): 17656–17666. DOI 10.1073/pnas.2006991117.
- Boschma R., 2015. Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies 49(5): 733–751. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481.
- Brada J., Gajewski P., Kutan A.M., 2021. Economic resiliency and recovery, lessons from the financial crisis for the COVID-19 pandemic: A regional perspective from Central and Eastern Europe. International Review of Financial Analysis 74: 1–12. DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101658.
- Brakman S., Garretsen H., Van Marrewijk C., 2015. regional resilience across Europe: On urbanization and the initial impact of the great recession. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society 8(2): 225–240. DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv005.
- Camagni R., 2008. regional competitiveness: Towards a concept of territorial capital. In: Capello R., Camagni R., Chizzolini B., Fratesi U. (eds), Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe: European competitiveness and global strategies. Springer Verlag, Berlin: 33–47. DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-74737-6_3.
- Capello R., Caragli A., Fratesi U., 2015. Spatial heterogeneity in the costs of the economic crisis in Europe: Are cities sources of regional resilience? Journal of Economic Geography 15(5): 951–972. DOI10.1093/jeg/lbu053.
- Cerasoli M., Amato C., Ravagnan C., 2022. An antifragile strategy for Rome post-COVID mobility. Transportation Research Procedia 60: 338–345. DOI 10.1016/j.tr-pro.2021.12.044.
- Churski P., Adamiak C., Szyda B., Dubownik A., Pietrzy-kowski M., Śleszyński P., 2023. Nowa delimitacja miej-skich obszarów funkcjonalnych w Polsce i jej zastosowa-nie w praktyce zintegrowanego podejścia terytorialnego (place-based approach) (A new delimitation of Functional Urban Areas in Poland and its application in the practice of the place-based approach), Przegląd Geograficzny 95(1): 29–55. DOI 10.7163/PrzG.2023.1.2.
- Churski P., Adamiak C., Dubownik A., Komornicki T., Pietrzykowski M., Szyda B., Śleszyński P., 2024. The changing role of functional urban areas in regional policy: New challenges for place-based policy. 01/2024 – Working Paper of TIPERICO Project. Faculty of Human Geography and Planning, adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań. Online: https://tiperico.web.amu.edu.pl/pl/publikac-je/79-the-changing-role-of-functional-urban-areas-in-re-gional-policy-new-challenges-for-place-based-policy (accessed 12 June 2024).
- Copus A., Mantino F., Noguera J., 2017. Inner peripheries: An oxymoron or a real challenge for territorial cohesion? Italian Journal of Planning Practice 7(1): 24–49.
- Cotella G., Vitale Brovarone E., 2020. Questioning urbanisation models in the face of COVID-19. TeMA. Journal of Land Use. Mobility and Environment. Special Issue 105– 118. DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/6913.
- Davenport A., Zaranko B., 2020. Levelling up: Where and how? london. Online: https://ifs.org.uk/sites/default/files/output_url_files/CH7-IFS-Green-Budget-2020-level-ling-up.pdf (accessed 13 June 2024).
- Diemer A., Iammarino S., Rodríguez-Pose A., Storper M., 2022. The regional development trap in Europe. Economic Geography 98(5): 487-509. DOI 10.1080/00130095.2022.2080655.
- Dijkstra L., Poelman H., Rodríguez-Pose A., 2020. The geography of EU discontent. Regional Studies 54(6): 737–753. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603.
- Dzigbede K., Gehl S., Willoughby K., 2020. Disaster resiliency of US local governments: Insights to strengthen local response and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Administration Review 80(4): 634–643. DOI10.1111/puar.13249.
- European Commission: Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. The future of social protection and of the welfare state in the EU, 2023. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI 10.2767/35425.
- European Commission: Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy. Forging a sustainable future together – Cohesion for a competitive and inclusive Europe – report of the high-level Group on the Future of Cohesion Policy, February 2024. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI 10.2776/974536.
- Farole T., Goga S., Ionescu-Heroiu M., 2018. Rethinking lagging regions: Using cohesion policy to deliver on the potential of Europe’s regions. World Bank Report on The European Union. Washington. Online: https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/739811525697535701-0080022018/original/rlrFUllonline20180501.pdf (accessed 12 June 2024).
- Floerkemeier M.H., Spatafora M.N., Venables A., 2021. Regional disparities, growth, and inclusiveness. IMF Working Papers3. DOI 10.5089/9781513569505.001.
- Friedman T.L., 2005. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
- Fritsch M., Kahila P., Nemeth S., Scott J., W. (eds), 2023. Spatial justice and cohesion. The role of place-based action in community development (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI 10.4324/9781003229681.
- Giannakis E., Bruggeman A., 2020. Regional disparities in economic resilience in the European Union across the urban–rural divide. Regional Studies 54(9): 1200–1213. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1698720.
- Hadjimichalis C., 2021. An uncertain future for the post-Brexit, post-COVID-19 European Union. European Urban and Regional Studies 28(1): 8–13. DOI 10.1177/0969776420968961.
- Harvey D., 2005. Space of neoliberalization: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart.
- Hertrich T.J., Brenner T., 2024. When the past becomes the future: The problem of policies in ‘left behind’ places. No. 02.24. Working Papers on Innovation and Space. Philipps-Uni-versität Marburg.
- Iammarino S., Rodríguez-Pose A., Storper M., 2019. regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography 19(2): 273–298. DOI 10.1093/jeg/lby021.
- Jagódka M., Snarska M., 2022. Should we continue EU cohesion policy? The dilemma of uneven development of Polish regions. Social Indicators Research 165: 901–917. DOI 10.1007/s11205-022-03048-8.
- Kang W., Wang Q., 2021. What are the impacts of COVID-19 on small businesses in the U.S.? Early evidence based on the largest 50 MSAs. Geographical Review 111(4): 528–557. DOI 10.1080/00167428.2021.1927731.
- Kang W., Wang Q., 2023. The impact of COVID-19 on small businesses in the US: A longitudinal study from a regional perspective. International Regional Science Review 46(3): 235–265. DOI 10.1177/01600176221132230.
- Kilmer M.E., Horesh L., Avron H., Newman E., 2021. Tensor-tensor algebra for optimal representation and compression of multiway data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(28): 1–12. DOI 10.1073/pnas.2015851118.
- Kowalski T., 2024. Macroeconomic implications of the COVID-19 revisited. In: Mińska-Struzik E., Jankowska B. (eds), Is there any “new normal”? Economics of the turmoil. University of Economics and Business Press: Poznań 39– 63. DOI10.18559/978-83-8211-217-7/2.
- Lange B., Hülz M., Schmid B., Schulz C. (eds), 2021. Postgrowth geographies. Spatial relations of diverse and alternative economies. Social and Cultural Geography. Columbia University Press.
- Lee S., Park J., Cha S., Kim D., 2022. a regional economy’s resistance to the COVID-19 shock: Sales revenues of micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises in South korea. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 13(2): 190–198. DOI 10.1007/s13753-022-00402-9.
- Letta E., 2024. Much more than a market. Speed, security, solidarity. Empowering the Single Market to deliver a sustainable future and prosperity for all EU Citizens. Institut Jacques Delors. Paris. Online: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/ny3j24sm/much-more-than-a-market-report-by-enrico-Letta.pdf (accessed 10 June 2024).
- MacKinnon D., Kempton L., O’Brien P., Ormerod E., Pike A., Tomaney J., 2022. Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society 15(1): 39–56. DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsab034.
- MacLeod G., Jones M., 2020. Explaining ‘Brexit capital’: Uneven development and the austerity state. In: Boyle M., Paddison R., Shirlow P. (eds), Brexit geographies. Routledge, london.
- Marchigiani E., Bonfantini B., 2022. Urban transition and the return of neighbourhood planning. Questioning the proximity syndrome and the 15-minute city. Sustainability 14(9): 5468. DOI 10.3390/su14095468.
- Martin R., 2010. The local geographies of the financial crisis: From the housing bubble to economic recession and beyond. Journal of Economic Geography 11(4): 87–618. DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbq024.
- Martin R., 2011. Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography 12(1): 1–32. DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019.
- Martin K., Lee K.E., Hall J.P., 2021. Public policy. Origins, practice, and analysis. Dahlonega, Georgia: University of North Georgia Press.
- Martin R., Sunley P., 2020. Regional economic resilience: Evolution and evaluation. In: Bristow G., Healy A. (eds), Handbook on Regional Economic Resilience: Edward Elgar Publishing: 10–35.
- Martin R., Sunley P., Gardiner B., Tyler P., 2016. How regions react to recessions: Resilience and the role of economic structure. Regional Studies 50(4): 561–585. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410.
- Mattinson D., 2020. Beyond the Red Wall: Why Labour lost, how the Conservatives won and what will happen next? Biteback Publishing. London.
- Mbah R.E., Wasum D.F., 2022. Russian-Ukraine 2022 War: A review of the economic impact of Russian-Ukraine crisis on the USA, UK, Canada, and Europe. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 9(3): 144–153. DOI 10.14738/as-srj.93.12005.
- McCann P., 2008. Globalization and economic geography: The world is curved, not flat. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society 1(3): 351–370. DOI10.1093/cjres/rsn002.
- McCann P., 2023. How have place-based policies evolved to date and what are they for now? In: Background paper for the OECD-EC High-Level Expert Workshop Series on ‘Place-Based Policies for the Future’. Workshop 1: 14. Online: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regionaldevelopment/place-based-policies-for-the-future.htm (accessed 10 June 2024).
- Milly D.J., 2023. Multilevel governance, community and emergency management during the pandemic: Migrants in Japan. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 43(3/4): 384–401. DOI 10.1108/ijssp-06-2022-0172.
- Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development and/or Territorial Cohesion, 2020. Territorial agenda 2030. Online: http://www.bmi.bund.de (accessed 17 June 2024).
- Moreno C., 2020. Droit de cité: De la ‘ville-monde’ à la ‘ville du quart d’heure’ (Freedom of the city: From the ‘world city’ to the ‘quarter-hour city’). Edition de l’Observatoire, Paris.
- Moreno C., Allam Z., Chabaud D., Gall C., Pratlong F., 2021. Introducing the ‘15-minute city’: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities 4: 93–111. DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006.
- Muro M., 2023. Biden’s big bet on place-based industrial policy. Brookings Institution. United States of America. Online: https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/2dh9mson 25 Oct 2024 (accessed 13 July 2024).
- Ninth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. March 2024. Regional and Urban Policy. European Commission. luxembourg. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/region-al_policy/information-sources/cohesion-report_en (accessed 15 May 2024).
- OECD, 2020. The territorial impact of COVID-19: Managing the crisis across levels of governments. OECD tackling coronavirus (COVID-19): Contributing to a global effort. Online: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/the-territorial-impact-of-COVID-19-managing-the-cri-sis-across-levels-of-government-d3e314e1/(accessed 17 June 2024).
- OECD Regional Outlook, 2023. The Longstanding geography of inequalities. OECD Publishing, Paris. Online: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-regional-out-look-2023_92cd40a0-en.html (accessed 13 June 2024).
- Pike A., Béal V., Cauchi-Duval N., Franklin R., Kinossian N., Lang T., Leiber T., MacKinnon D., Rousseau M., Royer J., Servillo L., Tomaney J., Velthuis S., 2023. ‘left behind places’: A geographical etymology. Regional Studies 58(6): 1167–1179. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2023.2167972.
- Pinheiro F.L., Balland P.-A., Boschma R., Hartmann D., 2022. The dark side of the geography of innovation: Relatedness, complexity and regional inequality in Europe. Regional Studies: 1–16. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2022.2106362.
- Pinto F., Akhavan M., 2021. Scenarios for a post-pandemic city: Urban planning strategies and cHallenges of making “Milan 15-minutes city”. European Transport/Trasporti Europei 85(12): 1–15. DOI 10.48295/ET.2021.85.12.
- Ray D.M., MacLachlan I., Lamarche R., Srinath K.P., 2017. Economic shock and regional resilience: Continuity and change in Canada’s regional employment structure, 1987–2012. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49(4): 952–973. DOI 10.1177/0308518X16681788.
- Rocco R.K.F., Faludi A., 2022. Faludi blogging: Chasing terri-torialism: Short essays by Andreas Faludi. TU Delft Open Publishing. DOI 10.34641/mg.41.
- Rodríguez-Pose A., Bartalucci F., Lozano-Gracia N., Davalos M., 2024. Overcoming left-behindedness. Moving beyond the efficiency versus equity debate in territorial development. Urban, Disaster Risk Management, Resilience and land Global Practice & Poverty and Equity Global Practice. March 2024. Policy Research Working Paper 10734: Online: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099224303262426681/pdf/IDU17dc414d91a08a142a-d1a8da1e2c5bf4ade41.pdf (accessed 13 June 2024).
- Rodríguez-Pose A., Crescenzi R., 2008. Mountains in a flat world: Why proximity still maters for the location of economic activity. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society 1(3): 371–388. DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsn011.
- Rodríguez-Pose A., Dijkstra L., Poleman H., 2023. The geography of EU discontent and the regional development trap. Working Papers. A series of short papers on regional Research and indicators produced by the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy WP 03/2023. European Commission, European Union, Luxembourg. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/reports/Geography_of_Discontent_and_development_trap_forlay-out.pdf (accessed 20 May 2024).
- Sabirin A., Adiyaksa F.D., Herfian R.H., 2022. Perspective between central and regional government relations in legal problems to handle COVID-19 pandemic. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) 3(2): 18–30. DOI 10.22219/aclj.v3i2.22040.
- Servillo L., Russo A.P., Barbera F., 2016. Inner peripheries: Towards an EU place-based agenda on territorial periph-erality. Italian Journal of Planning Practice 6(1): 42–75.
- Tomaney J., Pike A., Natarajan L., 2021. Land-use planning, inequality and the problem of ‘left-behind places’-A ‘provocation’ for the UK2070 Commission. The Uk2070 Papers. Online: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10125613/7/Na-tarajan_Uk2070PapersSeries3_extracted.pdf (accessed 20 May 2024).
- UNCDF, 2020. COVID-19 Emergency Response. Local Government Finance. Guidance Note for Immediate Action. Online: https://www.local2030.org/library/764/Local-Government-Finance-Guidance-Note-for-Immediate-Action.pdf (accessed 12 June 2024).
- Zhai W., Liu M., Fu X., Peng Z.R., 2021. american inequality meets COVID-19: Uneven spread of the disease across communities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111(7): 2023–2043. DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1866489.