References
- Ash J., Kitchin R., Leszczynski A., 2016. Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography 42(3): 473–481.
- Axon S., Speake J., Crawford K.R., 2012. ‘At the next junction, turn left’. Attitudes towards Sat Nav use. Area 44(2): 170–177.
- Babbie E., 2009. Podstawy badań społecznych. PWN, Warszawa.
- Bakar A., Shah K., Qingyu X., 2020. The effect of communication barriers on distance learning achievements. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica 29(5): 248–264.
- Basargekar P., Singhavi C., 2017. Factors affecting teachers’ perceived proficiency in using ICT in the classroom. IAFOR Journal of Education 5: 67–84.
- Batty D., Hall R., 2020. No campus lectures and shut student bars: UK universities’ £1bn struggle to move online. The Guardian, 25 April. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/apr/25/degrees-of-separation-can-universities-adapt-in-the-rush-to-online-learning (accessed 01.07.2024)
- Bernard R.M., Abrami P.C., Yiping L., Borokhovski E., 2004. A methodological morass? How we can improve quantitative research in distance education. Distance Education 25: 175–198. DOI 10.1080/0158791042000262094.
- Bokayev B., Torebekova Z., Davletbayeva Z., Zhakypova F., 2021. Distance learning in Kazakhstan: Estimating parents’ satisfaction of educational quality during the coronavirus. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 30(1): 27–39. DOI 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1865192.
- Bose P., 2014. Technofetishism and online education: Globalizing geography through virtual worlds. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 38(1): 28–39.
- Buchner A., Majchrzak M., Wierzbicka M., 2020. Edukacja zdalna w czasie pandemii. Raport z badań, Centrum Cyfrowe. Online: https://www.scdn.pl/images/stories/raporty2020/Edukacja_zdalna_w_czasie_pandemii.pdf (accessed 18 November 2020).
- Burns M., 2011. Distance Education for Teacher Training: Modes, Models, and Methods. Education Development Center, Washington. Online: https://www.edc.org/sites/default/files/uploads/Distance-Education-Teacher-Training.pdf (accessed 18 November 2020).
- Byrne B.M., 2013. Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge, Londyn.
- Cavanaugh C., Gillan K.J., Kromrey J., Hess M., Blomeyer R., 2004. Effects of distance education on K-12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Learning Point Associate, Naperville, IL.
- Chase A.M., Taylor-Guy P., 2020. COVID-19: Continuity of teaching and learning – an evidence-based approach. Teacher Magazine, Monash University.
- Cichoń M., 2021. Pomiędzy modelem transmisyjnym a aktywizującym, czyli jak można zdalnie kształcić uczniów na lekcjach geografii. Prace Komisji Edukacji Geograficznej 11: 125–138.
- Cole A.W., Allen M., Anderson C., Bunton T., Cherney M.R., Draeger R. Jr., Featherston M., Fisher V.C., Motel L., Nicolini K.M., Peck B., 2017. Student predisposition to instructor feedback and perceptions of teaching presence predict motivation toward online courses. Online Learning 21(4): 245–262. DOI 10.24059/olj.v21i4.966.
- Cook B.R., Babon A., 2017. Active learning through online quizzes: Better learning and less (busy) work. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 41(1): 24–38.
- Corbera E., Anguelovski I., Honey-Rosés J., Ruiz-Mallén I., 2020. Academia in the time of COVID-19: Towards an ethics of care. Planning Theory & Practice 21(2): 191–199.
- Daniels N., 2020. Should students be monitored when taking online tests? The New York Times, 12 May. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/12/learning/should-students-be-monitored-when-taking-online-tests.html (accessed 18 November 2020).
- Danieluk M., 2019. Tik w pigułce. Narzędziownik nauczyciela. Centrum Rozwoju Edukacji EDICON sp. z o.o., Poznań.
- Dylak S., 2013. Architektura wiedzy w szkole. Difin SA, Warszawa.
- Dziechciarz J.Z., 2002. Ekonometria. Metody Przykłady Zadania. 2nd edn. PWN, Warszawa.
- Fila J., Jeżowski M., Pachocki M., Rybińska A., Regulska M., Sot B., 2020. Nauczyciele w sieci. Raport z badania użytkowników platformy eTwinning. Online: https://www.frse.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/raport-etwinning.pdf (accessed 18 November 2020).
- Fives H., Buehl M.M., 2012. Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In: Harris K.R., Graham S., Urdan T., Graham S., Royer J.M., Zeidner M. (eds), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC: 471–499. DOI 10.1037/13274-019.
- Fuller S., Ruming K., Burridge A., Carter-White R., Houston D., Kelly L., Lloyd K., McGregor A., McLean J., Miller F., O’Gorman E., Suchet-Pearson S., Taylor H., Walkerden G., Williams M., Ziller A., 2021. Delivering the discipline: Teaching geography and planning during COVID-19. Geographical Research 59(3): 331–340. DOI 10.1111/1745-5871.12472.
- Gewertz C., 2020. See which states have cancelled spring tests because of coronavirus. Education Week. Online: https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/see-which-states-have-cancelled-spring-tests-because-of-coronavirus/2020/03 (accessed 18 November 2020).
- Głowacz A., 2015. Teoretyczne i praktyczne aspekty wykorzystania GIS w szkolnej edukacji geograficznej. In: Hibszer A., Szkurłat E. (eds), Technologie informacyjno-komunikacyjne w kształceniu geograficznym. Założenia teoretyczne. Diagnoza wykorzystania. Prace Komisji Edukacji Geograficznej PTG, Łódź, Vol. 5: 73–88.
- Grace J.B., 2006. Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Greenberg G., 1998. Distance education technologies: Best practices for K-12 settings. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 17(4): 36–40. DOI 10.1109/44.735862.
- Greenhow C., Lewin C., Staudt Willet K.B., 2021. The educational response to COVID-19 across two countries: A critical examination of initial digital pedagogy adoption. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 30(1): 7–25. DOI 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1866654.
- Gunawan J., Marzilli C., Aungsuroch Y., 2021. Establishing appropriate sample size for developing and validating a questionnaire in nursing research. Belitung Nursing Journal 7: 356–360. DOI 10.33546.
- Herold B., 2020. The disparities in remote learning under coronavirus (in charts). Education Week. Online: https://www.edweek.org/technology/the-disparities-in-remote-learning-under-coronavirus-in-charts/2020/04 (accessed 18 November 2020).
- Hibszer A., Szkurłat E., 2015. Technologie informacyjno-komunikacyjne w kształceniu geograficznym. założenia teoretyczne. Diagnoza wykorzystania. Prace Komisji Edukacji Geograficznej PTG, Wydawnictwo CUk, Łódź.
- Holmberg B., 1989. The concept, basic character and development potentials of distance education. Distance Education 10: 127–135.
- Hoyle R.H., 1995. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
- Hoyle R.K., 2011. Structural equation modeling for social and personality psychology 1–120, SAGE Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks.
- Hu L.T., Bentler P.M., 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1): 1–55.
- Inman E., Kerwin M., Mayes L., 1999. Instructor and student attitudes toward distance learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 23(6): 581–591.
- Islam N., 2018. A case study of SAMR model in teaching I, Journal of Hamdard University Bangladesh 4(2): 143–158.
- Kline R.B., 2010. Promise and pitfalls of structural equation modeling in gifted research. In: Thompson B., Subotnik R.F. (eds), Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness. American Psychological Association, Washington DC: 147–169.
- Lee h.J., Rha I., 2009. Influence of structure and interaction on student achievement and satisfaction in web-based distance learning. Educational Technology & Society 12(4): 372–382.
- Lee S.J., Lee H., Kim T.T., 2018. A study on the instructor role in dealing with mixed contents: How it affects learner satisfaction and retention in e-learning. Sustainability 10(3): 850.
- Łobocki M., 2010. Metody i techniki badań pedagogicznych. Impuls, Kraków.
- Lubuva E.E., Ndibalema P., Mbwambo E., 2022. Assessment of tutors’ level of ICT competencies in teaching in teacher education in Tanzania. Journal of Learning for Development 9(3): 436–454.
- Malina A., Zeliaś A., 1997. on building taxonometric measures of living condition. Statisticsin transition: An international journal of the Polish Statistical Association 3(2): 523–544.
- McCabe D., 2020. Poor Americans face hurdles in getting promised internet. The New York Times. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/20/technology/coronavirus-broadband-discounts.html (accessed on 18 November 2020).
- McIsaac M.S., Gunawardena C.N., 1996. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: A project of the association for educational communications and technology. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New york.
- Mishra P., Koehler M., 2006. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108(6): 1017–1054.
- Nsiah G.K.B., 2011. Case studies in US distance education: Implications for Ghana’s under-served high schools. Creative Education 2: 346–353. DOI 10.4236/ce.2011.24049.
- Palloff R.M., Pratt K., 2000. Making the transition: Helping teachers to teach online. Paper presented at EDUCAUSE: Thinking it through. Nashville, TN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 452 806). Retrieved October 4, 2003, from ERIC Database.
- Parmigiani D., Benigno V., Giusto M., Silvaggio C., Sperandio S., 2021. E-inclusion: Online special education in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 30(1): 111–124. DOI 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1856714.
- Piotrowska I., 2018. Technologie geoinformacyjne w podstawie programowej – wyzwanie dla nauczyciela geografii. In: hibszer A., Szkurłat E. (eds), Nauczyciel geografii wobec wyzwań reformowanej szkoły. Prace Komisji Edukacji Geograficznej PTG, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Bogucki, Poznań-Warszawa: 33–49.
- Piotrowska I., Abramowicz D., 2021. Czytanie i posługiwanie się mapą – kluczowa umiejętność w kształceniu geograficznym w podstawach programowych geografii na przykładzie Anglii, Francji, Hiszpanii i Polski. In: Hibszer A., Szkurłat E. (eds), Kształtowanie i ocenianie umiejętności w edukacji geograficznej – założenia teoretyczne i praktyczna weryfikacja. Prace Monograficzne Komisji Edukacji Geograficznej PTG, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań 11: 67–82.
- Piotrowska I., Abramowicz D., Cichoń M., Sypniewski J., 2022. Determinants and challenges of distance geographical education in Polish schools, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 32(16): 1–17. DOI 10.1080/10382046.2022.2084269.
- Piotrowska I., Przewoźna P., Bobińska A., 2023. Technologie geoinformacyjne w edukacji geograficznej. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.
- Piskorz, S., 1997. Zarys dydaktyki geografii. Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
- Plebańska M., Sieńczewska M., Szyller A., 2017. Polska szkoła w dobie cyfryzacji. Diagnoza 2017, Warszawa, UW.
- Polak M., 2015. Klasa aktywnego uczenia (się). online: https://eduspaces21.ceo.org.pl/aktualnosci/klasa-aktywnego-uczenia-sie (accessed on 18 November 2020).
- Ptaszek G., Stunża G.D., Pyżalski J., Dębski M., Bigaj M., 2020. Edukacja zdalna: Co stało się z uczniami, ich rodzicami i nauczycielami? Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk. Online: https://zdalnenauczanie.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/edukacja-zdalna.pdf (accessed on 18 November 2020).
- Puentedura R.R., 2013. SAMR: Getting To Transformation. Online: http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2013/04/16/SAMRGettingToTransformation. pdf (accessed on 18 November 2020).
- Rehn N., Maor D., McConney A., 2018. The specific skills required of teachers who deliver K–12 distance education courses by synchronous videoconference: Implications for training and professional development. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 27(4): 417–429. DOI 10.1080/1475939X.2018.1483265.
- Rockwell S.K., Schauer J., Fritz S.M., Marx D., 1999. Incentives and obstacles influencing higher education faculty and administrators to teach via distance. Online Journal of Distance Education Administration 2(4). Online: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=aglecfacpub (accessed on 18 November 2020).
- Saubern R., Urbach D., Koehler M., Phillips M., 2020. Describing increasing proficiency in teachers’ knowledge of the effective use of digital technology. Computers & Education 147(1). DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103784.
- Scully D., Lehane P., Scully C., 2021. ‘It is no longer scary’: Digital learning before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Irish secondary schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 30(1): 159–181. DOI 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854844.
- Sekułowicz M., Oleniacz M., 2012. Niesamodzielność. Studia z pedagogiki specjalnej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe DWS, Wrocław.
- Selwyn N., 2019. Should Robots Replace Teachers?: AI and the Future of Education. John Wiley & Sons, Cambridge, UK.
- Słomska-Przech K., Pokojski W., 2019. Możliwości wykorzystania map cyfrowych w nauce geografii w nawiązaniu do nowej podstawy programowej. Edukacja Biologiczna i Środowiskowa 1(70): 27–39.
- Speake J., Axon S., 2012. “I never use ‘maps’ anymore”. Engaging with Sat Nav Technologies and the implications for cartographic literacy and spatial awareness. The Cartographic Journal 49(2): 326–336.
- Speck D., 2020. Teachers’ skills ‘improve in lockdown. Tes. Online: https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/teachers-skills-improve-lockdown (accessed on 18 November 2020).
- Stefaniak A., 2013. Wykorzystywanie i rola map na lekcjach geografii w opinii nauczycieli. Przegląd Geograficzny 85(1): 103–112.
- Szkurłat E., Hibszer A., Piotrowska I., Rachwał T., 2018. Podstawa programowa geografii źródłem nauczycielskich wyzwań. In: Hibszer A., Szkurłat E. (eds), Nauczyciel geografii wobec wyzwań reformowanej szkoły. Prace Komisji Edukacji Geograficznej PTG, Sosnowiec 8: 11–32.
- Taylor J.C., 1995. Distance education technologies: The fourth generation. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 11(2): 1–7.
- Taylor J.C., 2001. Fifth generation distance education. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology (e-JIST) 4(1): 1–14.
- UNESCO, 2018. UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers, Online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721 (accessed on 18 November 2020).
- UNESCO, 2020a. COVID-19: A Global Crisis for Teaching and Learning. Online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373233.local=en (accessed on 18 November 2020).
- UNESCO, 2020b. Supporting teachers and education personnel during times of crisis, ED/2020/IN2.2. Online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373338 (accessed on 18 November 2020).
- UNESCO, 2023. UNESCO. Global education monitoring report, 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? Online: https://doi.org/10.54676/UzQV8501 (accessed on 18 November 2020).
- Watermeyer R., Crick T., Knight C., Goodall J., 2021. COVID-19 and digital disruption in UK universities: Afflictions and affordances of emergency online migration. Higher Education 81: 623–641. DOI 10.1007/s10734-020-00561-y.
- Webster J., Hackley J.P., 1997. Teaching effectiveness in technology – mediated distance learning. The Academy of Management Journal 40(6): 1282–1309.
- Westland J., 2010. Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 9(6): 476–487.
- Wiegand P., 2006. Learning and teaching with maps 1st edn, Routledge, London. DOI 10.4324/9780203477793.
- Wijaya T.T., Rizki L.M., Yunita W., Salamah U., Pereira J., Zhang C., Li X., Purnama A., 2021. Technology integration to teaching mathematics in higher education during corona virus pandemic using SAMR model. Journal of Physics Conference Series 2123(1): 12043.
- Winter E., Costello A., O’Brien M., Hickey G., 2021. Teachers’ use of technology and the impact of COVID-19, Irish Educational Studies 40(2): 235–246. DOI 10.1080/03323315.2021.1916559.
- Wolf P.D., 2006. Best practices in the training of faculty to teach online. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 17: 47–78. DOI 10.1007/BF03032698.
- Yang Y., Cornelius L.F., 2004. Students’ perceptions towards the quality of online education: A qualitative approach. Association for Educational Communications and Technology 27: 861–877.
- Zeliaś A., Pawełek B., Wanat S., 2002. Metody statystyczne: zadania i sprawdziany. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
- Żyto A., Cichoń M., 2019. Wykorzystanie TIK na lekcjach geografii w kontekście nowej podstawy programowej do szkoły ponadpodstawowej. Perspektywy i wyzwania współczesnej edukacji. Wyd. Nauk. TYGIEL, Lublin: 133–147.